Apr 9, 2018 · 58m · capital-allocators
Chris Brockmeyer – On Broadway (Capital Allocators, EP.47)
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Chris Brockmeyer, Director of Employee Benefit Funds for the Broadway League, exploring the governance complexities, asset allocation shifts, and operational transitions of managing $7 billion across multi-employer Taft-Hartley pension and benefit plans. Brockmeyer details how labor-management dynamics, philosophical principles, and the strategic shift toward Outsource CIO (OCIO) models drive long-term fiduciary success in commercial theatre retirement funds.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 23.2% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Brockmeyer pushes back against Ted's suggestion that holding through 2008 was purely an accidental byproduct of slow decision-making rather than conscious fortitude.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 51:04 Ted pushes back on OCIO best-of-breed claimsTed directly challenges the assumption that scaling consultants can deliver superior alpha, pointing out that by definition, scaled OCIOs cannot give everyone best-in-breed managers.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 21:21 Brockmeyer explains union bans on international equityBrockmeyer reveals to Ted that historical Taft-Hartley restrictions avoided international developed equities because unions objected to funding non-American labor competitors.
Ted holds their own ▶ 33:37 Ted challenges 7.5 percent return assumptions against market realitiesTed leverages market expertise regarding compressed bond yields and high equity valuations to challenge whether boards understand the difficulty of achieving target returns.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From Philosophy to Labor Relations on Broadway | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Ted opens with conversational questions about Brockmeyer's transition from philosophy to Broadway labor relations. Brockmeyer explains how negotiation and debate skills translated naturally to representing unions and management. | |
| The Structure of Broadway League Multi-Employer Plans | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Ted asks structural questions about the 13 distinct boards and 21 plans. Brockmeyer details the multi-employer Taft-Hartley framework and why historical pride prevents broader plan mergers. | |
| Governance Hurdles and Decision-Making Lag in Pensions | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Ted pushes on the lack of investment professionals among trustees, asking what choice they have but to follow consultants. Brockmeyer explains the painful lag of governance, such as taking over two years to allocate to private equity. | |
| Evolution of Asset Allocation and Diversification Post-2008 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Brockmeyer educates Ted on the unique political restrictions of pre-2008 Taft-Hartley plans, including resistance to non-US investments. The 2008 crisis forced boards into broader asset diversification like private equity and credit. | |
| Navigating Investment Consultants and Trustee Board Dynamics | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted prompts Brockmeyer for concrete examples of consultant breakdowns. Brockmeyer outlines an instance where perceived favoritism between union and management trustees poisoned trust during a private equity search. | |
| Pension Liabilities, LDI Infeasibility, and Return Assumptions | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Ted probes the tension between funding levels and risk-taking. Brockmeyer explains why Liability-Driven Investing (LDI) is politically impossible in Taft-Hartley plans because it caps future benefit growth. | |
| Sponsor Spotlight: Ridgeline Investment Management Technology | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | After the sponsor break, Ted challenges whether actuarial return assumptions of 7.5% remain realistic given market valuations. Brockmeyer explains the shift toward separating 5-10 year capital market assumptions from 30-year horizons. | |
| Consultant Effectiveness, Market Patience, and Hegelian Dialectics | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Ted sharpens the conversation by asking if sitting through the 2008 drawdown was wisdom or just governance paralysis. Brockmeyer defends the board's patience while acknowledging the lag, bringing in Hegelian dialectics as a negotiation philosophy. | |
| Transitioning Multi-Employer Plans to an OCIO Model | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 | Ted questions whether OCIO models justify their higher fees through alpha or merely by circumventing human behavioral mistakes. Brockmeyer explains their recent adoption of an OCIO model and illustrates the rare value of rapid governance via the TARP program. | |
| Comparing Pension Governance and Investment Manager Selection | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 | Ted presses on capacity constraints, challenging whether scaled OCIOs inevitably dilute performance toward the average. Brockmeyer notes that their new OCIO replaced 29 of 30 existing managers with non-traditional Taft-Hartley rosters. |