Dec 3, 2018 · 53m · capital-allocators
Tom Bushey – Launching a Hedge Fund (Capital Allocators EP.78)
0:00 / 0:00
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Tom Bushey, founder of Sunderland Capital, detailing his career trajectory from private equity and BlackRock to launching an independent hedge fund. Bushey shares candid insights into the realities of startup operations, institutional fundraising challenges, and the vital necessity of curating aligned, long-term limited partners.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 23.8% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Ted as informed peer 4.2 Guest teaching 4.7 Guest disagreement 0.5 Ted pushing back 0.8
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 33:25 Pushing back on allocator convention
Tom critiques allocators for claiming they want differentiated managers but penalizing non-conforming strategies, forcing managers into generic pitches.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 32:33 Ted presses on differentiation feasibilityTed directly challenges the feasibility of achieving genuine product differentiation in a crowded universe of thousands of hedge funds.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 46:10 Redefining hedge fund business riskTom educates the audience and reframes conventional wisdom by showing that asset size does not determine business survival; mismatched LP duration and expectations do.
Ted holds their own ▶ 15:10 Ted identifies capital duration risksTed frames the systemic risk of hot European fund-of-funds capital fleeing during liquidity squeezes, synthesizing the structural flaws of multi-billion asset bases.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Influences and Entrepreneurial Foundations | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Ted guides the discussion on early childhood influences with friendly, open-ended prompts. Tom shares his foundational entrepreneurial exposure at his family's auto dealership. | |
| Wharton Experience and Practical Business Skills | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Tom critiques business school education, noting that building DCF models does not prepare one for managing people or running an operating company. Ted probes into his progression from banking into private equity. | |
| Public Market Transition and the 2008 Crisis | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Tom explains the culture shock of moving from private equity to public markets and the hard lessons of 2008 when quantitative models failed. Ted asks pointed questions about duration of capital and market transitions. | |
| Managing Portfolios at BlackRock and Incubating Sunderland | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | Ted questions the value of institutional branding and portfolio management responsibilities. Tom details incubating his concentrated value strategy internally while managing broad portfolios at BlackRock. | |
| Investment Philosophy and the Catalyst to Launch | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | Tom outlines his investment philosophy of buying mispriced small public companies with a long horizon. Ted probes into the exact mechanics of leaving the institution once an anchor client agreed to back him. | |
| Preparing for Launch and Building Institutional Setup | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | Ted asks about personal financial risk management and readiness. Tom reflects candidly on his initial overoptimism and determination to build institutional-grade operations rather than a bare-bones solo shop. | |
| Sponsor: Ridgeline Investment Management Tech | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Following an ad read, Ted asks how running a hedge fund startup mirrors other businesses. Tom explains how operational adversity has sharpened his judgment when assessing executives at portfolio companies. | |
| Team Structure and Navigating 300 Pitch Meetings | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ted asks about initial staffing and go-to-market strategy. Tom notes that delegating marketing in an emerging fund fails because LPs buy into the principal, recounting the inefficiency of conducting 300 pitch meetings. | |
| The Paradox of Differentiation and Allocator Pushback | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | Ted questions how emerging managers can achieve real product differentiation. Tom describes the allocator trap where unique strategies receive heavy pushback, causing managers to water down their message until they sound generic. | |
| Day One Launch and Marketing Efficiency | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | Ted asks about launching with sub-target capital and balancing marketing with stock-picking. Tom shares that they launched with under twenty million dollars and learned to ruthlessly qualify prospective allocator interest. | |
| Performance Cycles, Aligned LPs, and Team Restructuring | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ted touches on performance chasing behavior among allocators. Tom observes how fast inquiries fluctuate with monthly numbers, and details the painful but necessary decision to restructure his initial team. | |
| Dispelling Launch Misconceptions and Business Risk | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ted and Tom discuss common misconceptions of launching an asset management firm. Tom reframes business risk, arguing that mismatched capital and expectations, rather than small AUM, destroy emerging funds. | |
| Organic LP Compounding and Product Structuring | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks about business expansion into co-investments and SPVs before concluding with rapid-fire personal questions. Tom emphasizes staying focused on finding 2 to 4 high-conviction ideas each year. |
Statements from this episode (15)
Bushey: Most of Sunderland Capital's 50 LPs are entrepreneurs or fund managers
“Even in what we do now, if you look at of our 50 LPs, most of them are entrepreneurs in some form and fashion. They either run an asset management business or have built their own company”
Bushey: Learning rudimentary DCF modeling in school has little real-world application
“Spending like a year of your life learning how to make a very rudimentary DCF model doesn't really apply in the real world so much.”
Bushey: Traditional private equity auctions are an inefficient capital allocation method
“When I was in private equity, I was the associate in charge of handling sort of the mail would come in and you get. 15 companies to look at and you'd pick one and you'd go bid and there'd be 50 other bidders on that. And that just never struck me as an efficie…”
Bushey: Quants at previous fund claimed losing over 5% was impossible
“At the firm I worked for, there were three Cambridge PhDs who would send me a spreadsheet saying it would be impossible to lose more than five percent of our portfolio.”
Bushey: Hedge fund AUM lacks the stability of private equity commitments
“Three billion dollars of capital is not the same as a three billion dollar private equity fund. And so as quickly as that goes up, even if performance isn't bad, it was primarily European fund-to-funds money, and that, that was a piggy bank very quickly”
Bushey: Mega-fund PMs have a distorted sense of raising outside capital
“I would say both of those experiences probably gave me a different sense of how hard it was to raise outside capital than it should have been. You didn't have to market. You just get a phone call being like, XYZ client wants to send you a large pile of money. …”
Bushey: Public small-caps trade at a 50% discount to PE multiples
“But in the public markets, especially in months like we just had in October, you're able to buy really great long-term outcomes for half off of a multiple you'd be willing to pay for in the private markets.”
Bushey: Sunderland Capital launched after securing BlackRock fund's seed client
“And so I approached the client who seeded this fund at BlackRock and I said, would you support me if I did it independently? And I was really lucky that they said yes.”
Bushey: Sunderland's Anchor Client Funded Its Institutional Infrastructure at Launch
“Our initial client was also very supportive of our business financially as well, so they were willing to help me spend the amount of money necessary to Set it up institutionally, and that was important to me. I didn't want to just get an office in the suburbs …”
Bushey: Small funds cannot outsource fundraising to dedicated sales hires
“And then marketing, I would say, whatever you want to call it, business development, marketing, the truth of the matter is in a small firm, it's next to impossible to have someone else sell marketing.”
Bushey: 200 of first 300 allocators called Sunderland's strategy ludicrous
“I mean, of those 301st meetings I had, probably 200 of those people told me why what I was doing was ludicrous, and here's how they would do it, and here's what their funds do.”
Bushey: Allocator pushback tempts emerging managers to sound generic
“When you launch and you maybe are doing something that's not well understood in the market, you get a lot of pushback. And then maybe I would even say to myself that we kind of pulled back a little bit and we'd go into meetings and we'd start even being vaguer…”
Bushey: Sunderland Capital launched with capital in the teens of millions
“Gosh, it was in the teens of millions of dollars. I don't remember exactly, but it wasn't a lot.”
Bushey: Zero LPs called when Sunderland's largest position broke
“We had a deal that was going to happen and broke, and it was our largest position, and I didn't get a single phone call from one of our 50 LPs in a very bad month for our largest position, not one phone call.”
Bushey: Fund business risk stems from misaligned capital, not AUM size
“It's not necessarily size that's ever a part of the business risk. I think it's, if you have mismatch of expectations and your capital, that is what really creates business risk. It doesn't matter if you're five billion or ten billion or fifty billion or fifty…”