May 3, 2021 · 1h 19m · capital-allocators
Innovation in Private Markets 1: Steve Moseley – The Space in Between GPs and LPs at Alaska Permanent Fund (Capital Allocators, EP.192)
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this inaugural episode of the 'Innovation in Private Markets' miniseries, host Ted Seides interviews Steve Moseley, Head of Alternative Investments at the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), on managing a multi-billion dollar private markets portfolio from Juneau. Moseley breaks down APFC's sovereign endowment model, its shift toward direct execution, and innovative investment structures across co-investments, GP stakes, and emerging manager seeding.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 12.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Moseley forcefully criticizes the conventional legal view of GP-LP negotiations as a zero-sum pendulum swing, arguing it ignores positive-sum ecosystem value creation.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 1:03:01 Ted challenges secondary selling against long-term hold philosophyTed directly highlights the contradiction in Moseley's framework between preaching multi-decade duration tolerance and actively executing secondary market portfolio sales.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 47:03 Moseley dismantles standard LP co-investment behaviorMoseley educates on allocator market mechanics, explaining why queuing up for hot syndicated deals represents commoditized capital that fails to generate true alpha compared to niche problem-solving capital.
Ted holds their own ▶ 46:36 Ted challenges portfolio complexity versus small-team bandwidthTed leverages his understanding of allocator operations to sharply question why Alaska undertakes hundreds of complex line items when managing tens of billions with a handful of people in Juneau.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Moseley's Path from Wall Street to Private Equity | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Ted opens with standard biographical prompts about Steve Moseley's career trajectory. Moseley shares self-deprecating anecdotes about his early Wall Street interviews, Merrill Lynch, Windward Capital, and Pacific Corporate Group in a friendly, conversational tone. | |
| The History, Governance, and Mission of Alaska Permanent Fund | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ted prompts Moseley to explain the unique history and governance of the Alaska Permanent Fund. Moseley gives an educational monologue covering the 1969 oil boom, early wasteful government spending, and Governor Jay Hammond's constitutional framework designed to protect capital from politicians. | |
| Transitioning from External Consultants to Internal Direct Execution | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Ted asks how Alaska shifted away from external fund-of-funds structures toward direct management. Moseley details how unwinding layers of consultants allowed the fund to capture higher intellectual capital and direct deal flow rather than merely saving fees. | |
| Core Philosophy of Private Equity Strategy and Manager Selection | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Ted probes on how Moseley weighs manager strategy versus individual team quality in private equity underwriting. Moseley explains his analytical preference for evaluating market opportunities first before evaluating the team's competitive differentiation. | |
| Balancing Direct Investments, Co-Investments, and Severe Team Constraints | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | Ted presses on the paradox of pursuing labor-intensive direct and co-investments while operating a tiny team in remote Juneau. Moseley re-frames their sourcing model around a shallow, flat funnel designed to reject unpromising deals quickly to protect human bandwidth. | |
| Underwriting Co-Investments, Consultant Clouds, and the US LBM Deal | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted asks for a concrete case study, prompting Moseley to detail their co-investment in US LBM alongside Kelso. Moseley explains using specialized external consultants on a deal-by-deal basis and navigating passive versus active governance. | |
| Capturing Value in Between: GP Stakes and Seeding Strategies | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | Ted challenges Moseley on why Alaska takes on extreme operational complexity for non-standard strategies given its massive scale. Moseley argues forcefully that participating in commodity syndicated co-investments earns poor returns, whereas providing problem-solving capital in seeding and GP stakes captures excess rents. | |
| Navigating Expensive Valuations, Pacing Discipline, and Secondary Trades | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | Ted presses on an apparent contradiction between Moseley's emphasis on long-term duration and his willingness to sell assets in secondary markets during high valuation environments. Moseley clarifies that pacing discipline and selective opportunistic exits allow them to mitigate peak valuation risks. | |
| Overcoming Talent, Compensation, and Geographical Challenges in Juneau | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | Ted asks Moseley how sustainable his role is given the legislative compensation caps and geographic constraints of Juneau. Moseley speaks candidly about political roadblocks, state salary comparisons, and the long-term risk of team dissipation. | |
| Personal Reflections, Book Recommendations, and Life Lessons | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | In closing rapid-fire questions, Moseley shares his outdoor hobbies, Dawkins's Selfish Gene, and his pet peeve regarding lawyers treating LP negotiations as zero-sum pendulum swings rather than value-creation partnerships. |