Jun 26, 2024 · 27m · big-technology
Decoding the NVIDIA Trade - With Michael Batnick
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
Host Alex Kantrowitz and wealth manager Michael Batnick analyze Nvidia's meteoric ascent to a multi-trillion-dollar valuation, evaluating its historical growth metrics, valuation multiples, and the long-term sustainability of AI infrastructure spending.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Alex holds 41.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Alex as informed peer 6.6 Guest teaching 3.4 Guest disagreement 1.7 Alex pushing back 2.1
speaking balance: gold is Alex, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 24:46 Firm rejection of Apple institutional comparison
Batnick immediately and bluntly dismisses Alex's suggestion that Nvidia can become a ubiquitous portfolio staple like Apple, arguing consumer products create a totally different dynamic.
Hardest push from Alex ▶ 19:58 Pushback on extended ROI timelinesAlex challenges the 'top of the first inning' narrative by pointing out that enterprise software rarely tolerates multi-year investment cycles without tangible top-line returns.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 11:13 Explaining the mechanism of valuation multiple compressionBatnick educates the audience on why strong underlying business growth is not enough to save an overvalued stock, citing Cisco's 15% post-bubble EPS growth alongside massive share destruction.
Alex holds their own ▶ 17:45 Full breakdown of AI software, networking, and CapexAlex takes command of the conversation by detailing Meta's H100 GPU commitments, full-stack CUDA and networking moats, and the critical 18-month model milestone timeline.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Alex as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Alex pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unprecedented Growth at Trillion-Dollar Scale | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Alex opens with detailed financial metrics on Nvidia's market cap impact and cites recent Bloomberg analysis on forecasting difficulties. Batnick responds collaboratively, comparing Nvidia's current 40x forward valuation to Cisco's dot-com bubble valuation of 130x. | |
| The $430 Billion Sell-Off and Growth Stock Volatility | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Alex brings up Bloomberg's coverage of Nvidia's $430 billion three-day sell-off and questions whether high volatility is structurally baked in. Batnick puts the drop into perspective by pointing out that only 14 S&P 500 companies have total market caps exceeding that loss. | |
| Discounted Cash Flows and Momentum versus Fundamentals | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Alex asks Batnick to explain how growth stock discounting differs from general market multiples, helping Batnick recover his train of thought. Batnick breaks down the disconnect between momentum buyers and long-term DCF realities, warning that Cisco grew earnings post-crash even while the stock plummeted. | |
| Parallels to Tesla, Netflix, and Customer Concentration Risks | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Alex introduces the comparison to Tesla and meme-stock behavior alongside customer concentration risk among hyperscalers. Batnick compares the situation to EV overproduction and streaming wars where competitors 'followed the roadrunner off the cliff,' though he openly admits he is not a hardware engineer. | |
| The 18-Month AI Capability Horizon and Competitive Moats | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | When Batnick invites Alex's take, Alex demonstrates deep domain expertise, detailing Meta's GPU capacity expansion, recommender architectures, and the 18-month AI model milestone horizon. Alex argues Nvidia's moat relies on software and networking rather than purely silicon. | |
| AI ROI Timelines, Cyclicality, and Cathie Wood's Exit | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Alex cites Sequoia Capital's analysis of AI CapEx versus revenue return to highlight the pending ROI challenge. Batnick counters with early-inning arguments and historical semiconductor cyclicality, followed by an analysis of Cathie Wood's premature exit. | |
| Post-Break Return: Can Nvidia Match Apple's Ubiquity? | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | Alex asks whether Nvidia can become an institutional staple like Apple, prompting Batnick to reject the premise due to Nvidia lacking consumer brand ubiquity. Alex shares an anecdote about retail stock split confusion, leading Batnick to explain retail psychology and why vertical price charts create instability. |
Statements from this episode (17)
Kantrowitz: Erasing Nvidia's 2024 gains would drop S&P 500 by 4.5%
“If NVIDIA were to lose the gains it has made this year overnight, the S&P
500 would have to come down approximately 4.5%.”
Batnick: No trillion-dollar company has ever grown as fast as Nvidia
“There has never been a company of this size growing this quickly.”
Kantrowitz: Nvidia has beaten internal revenue guidance midpoints by 13% average
“Since NVIDIA's sales began exploding in the fiscal quarter that ended in April, Revenue has exceeded the midpoint of the company's own forecast by an average of 13%.”
Batnick: Nvidia trades at 40x forward earnings compared to Cisco's dot-com 130x
“Cisco got as expensive as I think it was a 130 forward times earnings. Right now NVIDIA is trading somewhere between 40, let's call it 40 times forward earnings.”
Batnick: Nvidia has earned a valuation premium above market multiple
“I don't know what the right answer is, but it probably shouldn't be trading at a market multiple, call it 20 times or so, so it certainly has earned a premium that it's trading at.”
Batnick: Nvidia is only the 12th company to lead the S&P 500
“It's only the 12th or 13th company over the last hundred years to wear the crown of the number one company in the S and P 500. It's there's not been a lot of turnover at top. There's only 12 names and NVIDIA is one of them.”
Batnick: Only 14 S&P 500 companies exceed Nvidia's $430B three-day loss
“There's 14, there's 14 companies in the S&P 500 that are bigger than the market cap that was raised in three days. That's it. Only 14 companies are more than four to thirty billion dollars. That's as big as MasterCard and it did it in three days.”
Batnick: A 13% three-day drop is normal for high-growth stocks
“What happened over the last three days is abnormal in terms of the market cap losses, but for a company that's doubled and doubled again and doubled again or whatever the performance has been, for it to lose 13% in three days is completely normal. I mean, that…”
Batnick: Nvidia got cheaper during its run as EPS sextupled
“So Nvidia has gotten cheaper. Over the course of the run, because the fundamentals have outrun even the incredible share price. So over the last, so last year Nvidia earned a dollar nine. That was her earnings per share. Over the last 12 months, it's done six …”
Batnick: Cisco stock collapsed post-bubble despite 15% earnings growth
“Cisco, the business, compounded its earnings at something like 15% in the 15 to 20 years after the bubble burst. The stock got destroyed because it wasn't discounting 15 to 20% earnings per share growth. It ended up discounting like 40 to 50%.”
Kantrowitz: Big cloud providers drive about 45% of Nvidia's data center revenue
“And like something like 45% of Nvidia's data center revenue is coming from the big cloud providers, like those five customers.”
Kantrowitz: Meta aims to reach 650,000 H100 GPU equivalents in 2024
“Meta, as Meta, which said this year, it's going to go from 350 to 650,000 NVIDIA H 100 GPUs or equivalent, which is an incredible increase, right?”
Kantrowitz: AI spending will slow without step-change gains in 18 months
“And from everything that I hear, it's going to be the next 18 months that will basically decide, like, if they do 18 more months of development of these models within OpenAI, within Anthropic, within Microsoft, and Meta, and don't see sort of step change incre…”
Kantrowitz: Nvidia's biggest risk is AI slowing down, not competitors
“My perspective on this really is that the competition is, is really the AI boom slowing down more than it is any other company that's going to come in and take their lunch.”
Batnick: Nvidia could drop 50% without proving the bears right
“Can this thing get cut in half? Absolutely it can get cut in half. But does that prove the, does that prove that the bears were right? I don't think so. Growth stocks get cut in half all the time.”
Batnick: Missing Nvidia hurts Cathie Wood's innovation fund credibility
“She sold it before the run and listen, she has a difficult job, but to make matters worse, like she never got back on and there was a lot of opportunity for her to do so. And when you market yourself as the innovation fund and you miss the biggest innovation o…”
Batnick: Nvidia will never match Apple's portfolio ubiquity as a brand
“No, no, it can't. I think the reason why Apple became so ubiquitous in portfolios across America is because the brand, the products became so ubiquitous across America. I don't know what the average American has in their house in terms of the iPhone, maybe an …”