The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Ben Miller no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q I think people have loved throughout the season hearing the Fundrise story itself and how you guys raised a hundred and fifty-five million dollars from the retail investing public without actually going public yourself. Can you remind everyone how you did that, A, and then B, how you're now opening this up to every private company?

A When we started Fundrise in 2000 12, like the mission was to give individual investors direct access to real estate, because we saw when money's intermediated, problems happen. Intermediaries don't have the same interest as the owners. And so we scaled that business of democratizing real estate investing, having sort of a direct to consumer model. And then when we went to raise, we said, well, why Don't we walk around and talk? Why, why don't we raise money directly from the individual investors in the same way we do for real estate? And that was 2017. It was extremely uncertain. Like no one's ever done it before. We didn't know if it was going to work. And so we launched it. We think we raised seventeen million dollars in the first like 24 hours. It was like very successful. We said, okay, aha, this is the future. This is the way to do it. And we scaled up. Raise a hundred fifty-five million dollars for 35,000 investors for Fundrise itself, for the tech company, not just for the real estate. So we said, what's the next thing that we should do for other tech companies, and we should wrap it in a structure so that all the company has to do is what they normally do with an institutional investor, right? One company on your cap table, but behind it is like a mutual fund with millions of investors. And if you're a private company, you should want to have retail investment, From the…

AI assessment note: “we should wrap it in a structure so that all the company has to do”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, nearly 80 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.