Mack: Companies should split government relations into policy and public affairs
David Mack · a16z Podcast | The Case Study of Lyft and Local Governments · Jan 2, 2019 · at 5:13
David Mack, former public policy executive at Lyft, outlines structural best practices for tech companies negotiating local regulations on the a16z podcast.
0:00 / 0:15exact quote · 15.2s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“You should have your policy team that owns the relationships with elected officials. Negotiates the final details of what the law will be, and then you'd have a public affairs team, which is building the campaign and the atmosphere around those negotiations in such a way that they can be as successful as possible.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from David Mack
Mack: Corporate lobbying fails unless companies mobilize local constituents
“In the political process, companies advocating for themselves have very little power, self-interested, not very sympathetic. You have to find a way to make that connection with the constituents, and unless you can do that in a meaningful way, you're not going …”
Mack: Political consultants prioritize relationships with electeds over paying clients
“The most important thing you remember though about the policy folks, God bless them all, is they have two clients. One client are the folks that are Paying them and engaging with them, so that would be us. The other client, and perhaps more valuable, always mo…”