Christensen: Leaders fail at disruption because they lack shared framing language
Clayton Christensen · a16z Podcast | Competing Against Luck · Jan 2, 2019 · at 11:18
Clayton Christensen explains why executive teams struggle to execute strategies against disruption even when they recognize the threat.
0:00 / 0:19exact quote · 19.2s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“And the reason for the long story is I think when the established leaders have a tough time capturing disruption, even though They think they understand it. What makes it hard is they don't have the common language in a common way to frame the problem.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Clayton Christensen
Christensen: Online learning is rapidly disrupting Harvard Business School
“And, ah, online learning is improving at such a rapid rate that Harvard Business School is getting disrupted.”
Christensen: Offering products for free is the wrong strategy for market disruption
“And so giving anything away free is absolutely the wrong way to think about the problem.”
Christensen: Tech progress does not always outstrip customer ability to use it
“And I can't tell you how many millions of slides I projected that shows that trajectory of technological progress almost always outstrips the ability of customers to use it actually isn't true.”
Christensen: Incumbents survive disruption only by creating independent business units
“There have been a few examples, but in every case, The leader who caught this next wave had to set up a completely different business unit and manage it independently with different processes, a different architecture or economic structure, and those have been…”
Christensen: Marginal cost thinking traps established companies facing disruption
“In accounting, we teach people that you should ignore fixed and sunk costs and only look at the marginal cost and marginal revenue Associated with the proposal that you're making a decision about. And that idea that you should ignore sunk costs, and just look …”