Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each
question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on
four things from 1 to 5:
directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow),
precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted
mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange
scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean.
Full method →
Vlad Tenev no published score: only 2 usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone
Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5.
An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression.
The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the
cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only
toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.
Answered raw tape
D 4 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30
Q Besides time, what do you think are the actions that contributed most to the, to, to the brand getting back to where you want it to be?
A Yeah. I mean, really there's very few spikes upward. GameStop was like a downward spike, right? Um, I think time is by far the biggest element. People forget, you know, you have new young people, new users coming in, replacing the ones that were really upset. Uh, and then it's just looking at what things people complain about that you can resolve and addressing those. And then I think a couple of years ago, we started doing these product events, which I think had not just practical value, but also I think that they cultivated a community of shareholders and customers. And I think around our events, we noticed there was actually a pretty big increase. Like if we do get mini spikes of a couple of points, it's around those events.
AI assessment note: “we started doing these product events, which I think had not just practical value”
Answered raw tape
D 4 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.60
Q Besides time, what do you think are the actions that contributed most to the, to, to the brand getting back to where you want it to be?
A Yeah. I mean, really there's very few spikes upward. GameStop was like a downward spike, right? Um, I think time is by far the biggest element. People forget, you know, you have new young people, new users coming in, replacing the ones that were really upset. Uh, and then it's just looking at what things people complain about that you can resolve and addressing those. And then I think a couple of years ago, we started doing these product events, which I think had not just practical value, but also I think that they cultivated a community of shareholders and customers. And I think around our events, we noticed there was actually a pretty big increase. Like if we do get mini spikes of a couple of points, it's around those events.
AI assessment note: “we started doing these product events, which I think had not just practical value”
