The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Tyler Cowen no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
2exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Is it just not the inevitable cyclical progression that happens throughout history, or is there something different happening right now?

A No, it is the cyclical progression, but we ceased believing in that. So in America, you have the progressive movement, which has its left-wing form, but on the right, there's its classical liberal libertarian form. Where you think things will just keep on getting better, and markets will liberalize, and we'll spend more on social welfare, and poverty will be alleviated, and we'll all be freer, and we've had that vision since, I think, sometime in the 19 sixties, at least educated classes, and we're now learning that was a kind of lie, and we told it to ourselves to make ourselves feel better, but there's no guarantee we can deliver on most of it, and we're seeing a lot of backward movements, including on gender equality. It's not clear. That's moving forward anymore.

AI assessment note: “No, it is the cyclical progression, but we ceased believing in that.”

Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Is it just not the inevitable cyclical progression that happens throughout history, or is there something different happening right now?

A No, it is the cyclical progression, but we ceased believing in that. So in America, you have the progressive movement, which has its left-wing form, but on the right, there's its classical liberal libertarian form. Where you think things will just keep on getting better, and markets will liberalize, and we'll spend more on social welfare, and poverty will be alleviated, and we'll all be freer, and we've had that vision since, I think, sometime in the 19 sixties, at least educated classes, and we're now learning that was a kind of lie, and we told it to ourselves to make ourselves feel better, but there's no guarantee we can deliver on most of it, and we're seeing a lot of backward movements, including on gender equality. It's not clear. That's moving forward anymore.

AI assessment note: “No, it is the cyclical progression, but we ceased believing in that.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.