The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Rachel Kalmar no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 4 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q do you think about this as moving beyond early adopters? What do you think the obstacles and challenges are to actually making it more mainstream? I mean, Gary, the quantified self aspect of this like 20 years ago, and Rachel, you've been studying this like 12 years, I think, including your time at Stanford. What are your thoughts for making it not just something that like really motivated people do?

A I think about this as like cell phones or Cell phone cameras as they became cheaper and more and more people have them. And cell phone cameras also used to be pretty poor quality photos. But at the end of the day, the best camera is the one that you have. And so people kept using their cell phone cameras and they got better and better. And now most of us don't own regular cameras. We just use our cell phone. The devices that we wear are on a similar trajectory where right now we're in the poor quality environment. Photo phase. Over time, they're going to be better resolution, and they're going to be used by more people, but I also think in passive ways that don't necessarily require engagement, a lot of the tracking will be invisible, which is different from the quantified self. There will always be room for people who want to be engaged, and People who, uh, will have these, this data collection happening in the background.

AI assessment note: “a lot of the tracking will be invisible, which is different from the quantified self.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.