The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

David D'Amato no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q Is there sort of a boardroom one-on-one for what people should do with this information?

A There should be, and the challenge is right now there's no standardized way to report information to the board. So if you look at when I report financial information at my 10 K or 10 Q, I'm reporting, um, financial metrics in a similar way so that if I'm a board member on multiple boards, I can interpret that data and make sense of it. Each board is getting a different set of data and it's not always complete. And so one of the things that probably needs to happen in the near future is defined on a set standard that ensures that boards are first educated on what cybersecurity is. So they have to be knowledgeable about it, just like they have to know about financials, right? You wouldn't expect the board member to join and have no understanding of financial information. So I think that's incredibly important. You have to link it back to the impact in the organization to make it relevant to the board members so they actually understand there's a risk, but what's my impact? What's the cost?

AI assessment note: “There should be, and the challenge is right now there's no standardized way”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.