Answered raw tape
D 5 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 3 4.15
Q calculus? Was it that they were true believers in, in the fears? Was it that there was some sort of political benefit to having the, The views that they had, especially on the crypto side, I don't understand what's, what is the constituency for anti-crypto stance? How do you make sense of, of sort of the players or the, uh, intentions or motivation? Just understand sort of the calculus there.
A Yeah, you know, I mean, look, I, I think that that's a really, I think that's a really hard one to answer, and I'm not sure I can pretend to be completely in their minds. I think there's a couple of different competing forces here. Like, one is, you know, what are the constituencies that support sort of that administration? What are the constituencies that support, um, that side of the aisle? And I think that, especially over the last 10 to 15 years, it has been very, very heavy, heavy focus on consumer, Consumer safety. Which I think, look, a very important thing. We're obviously in alignment on that. I think everyone should be in alignment. Have to protect consumers. Have to be able to protect the American public. But I think that, um, a lot of that conversation has been weaponized. I think that it is, it is a big time moneymaker. I think a lot of these groups either get backing from very, very wealthy special interest, or they are small dollar fundraising off of quick hits like, You know, AI's coming for your jobs. Donate five dollars, and we're going to, you know, and we'll make sure that we take care of this in Washington for you. And, you know, like, pretty easy. You know, it's a pretty easy manipulation tactic. You know, it's used, like, from a bunch of people. But, but I think that that's like a very, that, that held very seriously true, right? And I think, um, you know…
AI assessment note: “I think there's a couple of different competing forces here.”
Answered raw tape
D 4 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.60
Q calculus? Was it that they were true believers in, in the fears? Was it that there was some sort of political benefit to having the, The views that they had, especially on the crypto side, I don't understand what's, what is the constituency for anti-crypto stance? How do you make sense of, of sort of the players or the, uh, intentions or motivation? Just understand sort of the calculus there.
A Yeah, you know, I mean, look, I, I think that that's a really, I think that's a really hard one to answer, and I'm not sure I can pretend to be completely in their minds. I think there's a couple of different competing forces here. Like, one is, you know, what are the constituencies that support sort of that administration? What are the constituencies that support, um, that side of the aisle? And I think that, especially over the last 10 to 15 years, it has been very, very heavy, heavy focus on consumer, Consumer safety. Which I think, look, a very important thing. We're obviously in alignment on that. I think everyone should be in alignment. Have to protect consumers. Have to be able to protect the American public. But I think that, um, a lot of that conversation has been weaponized. I think that it is, it is a big time moneymaker. I think a lot of these groups either get backing from very, very wealthy special interest, or they are small dollar fundraising off of quick hits like, You know, AI's coming for your jobs. Donate five dollars, and we're going to, you know, and we'll make sure that we take care of this in Washington for you. And, you know, like, pretty easy. You know, it's a pretty easy manipulation tactic. You know, it's used, like, from a bunch of people. But, but I think that that's like a very, that, that held very seriously true, right? And I think, um, you know…
AI assessment note: “a lot of these groups either get backing from very, very wealthy special interest”
