Answered produced feed
D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85
Q internet where you have this infinite shelf space to, to find them. But the second half of this, the fact that it went beyond a niche to a little bit more mainstream interest is I think really interesting. And besides nine 11, like what are some of the other epics in policy and political history that Have kind of led us there. Like, would Snowden be added to that list?
A So Snowden, Snowden is actually the, the second to last of these. So first, a huge percentage of the site was about the law of detention. The issue at hand was Guantanamo and the sort of developing law of detention, and should you close Guantanamo? Under what law should you hold people there? Under what law should you hold people somewhere else? Over time, that set of issues faded. The salience of the issue diminished. The parameters of the dispute narrowed, and the capacity to get the final thing done was reduced, and reduced to the point that it wasn't even clear how meaningful it would be if you got it done. You close Guantanamo, you move 40 detainees to the United States, you're still holding the same 40 detainees under the same legal authority. So just as that set of issues sort of started to fade away, it was replaced In the public's, in the, in the debate with issues around drones. And by the way, there were multiple aspects of that debate. There was a targeting debate, right? You know, when is it legal to kill somebody, like a different continent? When that person is in a war zone fighting you, but also when that person is not in a war zone, maybe not fighting you, but you think he's a terrorist who's going to. That's a very complicated set of legal targeting questions. But then there's also the, you know, the flying scary robot question, right, which is, you know, does…
AI assessment note: “Snowden, Snowden is actually the, the second to last of these.”
Answered produced feed
D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60
Q internet where you have this infinite shelf space to, to find them. But the second half of this, the fact that it went beyond a niche to a little bit more mainstream interest is I think really interesting. And besides nine 11, like what are some of the other epics in policy and political history that Have kind of led us there. Like, would Snowden be added to that list?
A So Snowden, Snowden is actually the, the second to last of these. So first, a huge percentage of the site was about the law of detention. The issue at hand was Guantanamo and the sort of developing law of detention, and should you close Guantanamo? Under what law should you hold people there? Under what law should you hold people somewhere else? Over time, that set of issues faded. The salience of the issue diminished. The parameters of the dispute narrowed, and the capacity to get the final thing done was reduced, and reduced to the point that it wasn't even clear how meaningful it would be if you got it done. You close Guantanamo, you move 40 detainees to the United States, you're still holding the same 40 detainees under the same legal authority. So just as that set of issues sort of started to fade away, it was replaced In the public's, in the, in the debate with issues around drones. And by the way, there were multiple aspects of that debate. There was a targeting debate, right? You know, when is it legal to kill somebody, like a different continent? When that person is in a war zone fighting you, but also when that person is not in a war zone, maybe not fighting you, but you think he's a terrorist who's going to. That's a very complicated set of legal targeting questions. But then there's also the, you know, the flying scary robot question, right, which is, you know, does…
AI assessment note: “Snowden is actually the, the second to last of these. So first, a huge percentage”
