Jan 2, 2019 · 48m · a16z

a16z Podcast | How to Lead, Not Manage Your Board

Scott Weiss · 11m spoken Spencer Rascoff · 10m spoken Aaron Levie · 7m spoken Bill Krauss · 7m spoken Dan Warmenhoven · 5m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this a16z podcast panel, seasoned executives and founders share actionable strategies for constructing, managing, and leading corporate boards across startup stages. The discussion highlights board composition, effective meeting dynamics, executive feedback loops, and the importance of external CEO support networks.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 3.4 Guest teaching 2.5 Guest disagreement 0.9 The host pushing back 0.6
05100:0015:0030:0045:000:00–2:01 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Panel Introductions and Director Backgrounds Scott introduces the panel and shares his founder and board background at Ironport and A16Z. The guests briefly introduce their extensive private and public board histories in a collaborative manner.2:01–6:24 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Audience Survey and Early-Stage Board Composition Strategies Scott proposes a strict rule of thumb to add one CEO for every VC added to early-stage boards. Dan Warmenhoven mildly disagrees, arguing that more than one outsider before Series B creates too many mouths to feed, leading Scott to clarify his ratio framework.6:24–10:34 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Selecting Directors: Generalist Experience vs. Domain Expertise Aaron Levie explains Box's evolution from needing flexible early investors to domain-specific board members like GE's former CIO. Dan underscores the necessity of generalist operating experience early over specialized domain expertise, with Scott adding that early directors function as CEO coaches.10:34–13:43 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Constructing Board Diversity and Vetting Venture Partners Spencer Rascoff compares board construction to assembling a baseball team of diverse skill sets to keep management honest. Bill Krauss and Spencer emphasize vetting the individual VC partner rather than just the VC firm brand, prompting Scott to discuss conducting reference checks.13:43–18:53 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Structuring Board Meetings and CEO Leadership Scott sets up board meeting preparation with the metaphor that boards eat whatever management serves them. Dan and Bill outline practical guidelines for leading boards, maintaining concise decks, avoiding dense slides, and delivering bad news quickly.18:53–23:57 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Executive Attendance, Memo Formats, and Meeting Tactics Aaron Levie discusses using executive participation to drive team accountability and detect scale issues. Spencer Rascoff details transitioning from slide decks to narrative memo formats and managing executive invitations thoughtfully.23:57–28:58 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Normalizing Executive Sessions and Classroom Dynamics Scott forcefully interrupts Spencer to strongly advocate for executive sessions without the CEO, explaining that normalizing them prevents directors from conspiring outside meetings. Scott contrasts open, productive meetings with secretive ones where management hides critical operational problems.28:58–32:42 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Audience Q&A: Ideal Board Size and Managing Observers In response to an audience question about board bloat, Dan recommends capping board size at eight people for public companies. Spencer shares an experience sitting in a crowded 30-person board meeting and offers strategies to limit observers, while Scott notes customer observers can hinder open debate.32:42–39:18 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Audience Q&A: Meeting Cadence and CEO External Support Systems Bill Krauss details standard board agendas, while Scott offers a distinct opening tactic of starting meetings with a CEO highlights-and-issues slide. Aaron explains that CEOs should cultivate external peer networks rather than relying exclusively on the board for personal development.39:18–44:50 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Audience Q&A: Board Fiduciary Duties, Peer Networks, and Stage Alignment Dan Warmenhoven delivers a blunt reality check to the room, asserting that the board exists to serve the company and that CEOs are expendable. Scott differentiates between operational questions appropriate for board members versus vulnerable questions best reserved for an independent CEO coach.44:50–47:59 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Audience Q&A: Inter-Meeting Board Communications and Conclusion The panel discusses maintaining inter-meeting board communications, with Bill recommending monthly updates and Aaron advocating reusing internal company emails. Scott shares his own practice of sending 'notes from the road' to both his board and full team after field visits.0:00–2:01 · Guest teaching 1/10 Panel Introductions and Director Backgrounds Scott introduces the panel and shares his founder and board background at Ironport and A16Z. The guests briefly introduce their extensive private and public board histories in a collaborative manner.2:01–6:24 · Guest teaching 3/10 Audience Survey and Early-Stage Board Composition Strategies Scott proposes a strict rule of thumb to add one CEO for every VC added to early-stage boards. Dan Warmenhoven mildly disagrees, arguing that more than one outsider before Series B creates too many mouths to feed, leading Scott to clarify his ratio framework.6:24–10:34 · Guest teaching 2/10 Selecting Directors: Generalist Experience vs. Domain Expertise Aaron Levie explains Box's evolution from needing flexible early investors to domain-specific board members like GE's former CIO. Dan underscores the necessity of generalist operating experience early over specialized domain expertise, with Scott adding that early directors function as CEO coaches.10:34–13:43 · Guest teaching 2/10 Constructing Board Diversity and Vetting Venture Partners Spencer Rascoff compares board construction to assembling a baseball team of diverse skill sets to keep management honest. Bill Krauss and Spencer emphasize vetting the individual VC partner rather than just the VC firm brand, prompting Scott to discuss conducting reference checks.13:43–18:53 · Guest teaching 3/10 Structuring Board Meetings and CEO Leadership Scott sets up board meeting preparation with the metaphor that boards eat whatever management serves them. Dan and Bill outline practical guidelines for leading boards, maintaining concise decks, avoiding dense slides, and delivering bad news quickly.18:53–23:57 · Guest teaching 3/10 Executive Attendance, Memo Formats, and Meeting Tactics Aaron Levie discusses using executive participation to drive team accountability and detect scale issues. Spencer Rascoff details transitioning from slide decks to narrative memo formats and managing executive invitations thoughtfully.23:57–28:58 · Guest teaching 2/10 Normalizing Executive Sessions and Classroom Dynamics Scott forcefully interrupts Spencer to strongly advocate for executive sessions without the CEO, explaining that normalizing them prevents directors from conspiring outside meetings. Scott contrasts open, productive meetings with secretive ones where management hides critical operational problems.28:58–32:42 · Guest teaching 2/10 Audience Q&A: Ideal Board Size and Managing Observers In response to an audience question about board bloat, Dan recommends capping board size at eight people for public companies. Spencer shares an experience sitting in a crowded 30-person board meeting and offers strategies to limit observers, while Scott notes customer observers can hinder open debate.32:42–39:18 · Guest teaching 3/10 Audience Q&A: Meeting Cadence and CEO External Support Systems Bill Krauss details standard board agendas, while Scott offers a distinct opening tactic of starting meetings with a CEO highlights-and-issues slide. Aaron explains that CEOs should cultivate external peer networks rather than relying exclusively on the board for personal development.39:18–44:50 · Guest teaching 5/10 Audience Q&A: Board Fiduciary Duties, Peer Networks, and Stage Alignment Dan Warmenhoven delivers a blunt reality check to the room, asserting that the board exists to serve the company and that CEOs are expendable. Scott differentiates between operational questions appropriate for board members versus vulnerable questions best reserved for an independent CEO coach.44:50–47:59 · Guest teaching 2/10 Audience Q&A: Inter-Meeting Board Communications and Conclusion The panel discusses maintaining inter-meeting board communications, with Bill recommending monthly updates and Aaron advocating reusing internal company emails. Scott shares his own practice of sending 'notes from the road' to both his board and full team after field visits.0:00–2:01 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Panel Introductions and Director Backgrounds Scott introduces the panel and shares his founder and board background at Ironport and A16Z. The guests briefly introduce their extensive private and public board histories in a collaborative manner.2:01–6:24 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Audience Survey and Early-Stage Board Composition Strategies Scott proposes a strict rule of thumb to add one CEO for every VC added to early-stage boards. Dan Warmenhoven mildly disagrees, arguing that more than one outsider before Series B creates too many mouths to feed, leading Scott to clarify his ratio framework.6:24–10:34 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Selecting Directors: Generalist Experience vs. Domain Expertise Aaron Levie explains Box's evolution from needing flexible early investors to domain-specific board members like GE's former CIO. Dan underscores the necessity of generalist operating experience early over specialized domain expertise, with Scott adding that early directors function as CEO coaches.10:34–13:43 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Constructing Board Diversity and Vetting Venture Partners Spencer Rascoff compares board construction to assembling a baseball team of diverse skill sets to keep management honest. Bill Krauss and Spencer emphasize vetting the individual VC partner rather than just the VC firm brand, prompting Scott to discuss conducting reference checks.13:43–18:53 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Structuring Board Meetings and CEO Leadership Scott sets up board meeting preparation with the metaphor that boards eat whatever management serves them. Dan and Bill outline practical guidelines for leading boards, maintaining concise decks, avoiding dense slides, and delivering bad news quickly.18:53–23:57 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Executive Attendance, Memo Formats, and Meeting Tactics Aaron Levie discusses using executive participation to drive team accountability and detect scale issues. Spencer Rascoff details transitioning from slide decks to narrative memo formats and managing executive invitations thoughtfully.23:57–28:58 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Normalizing Executive Sessions and Classroom Dynamics Scott forcefully interrupts Spencer to strongly advocate for executive sessions without the CEO, explaining that normalizing them prevents directors from conspiring outside meetings. Scott contrasts open, productive meetings with secretive ones where management hides critical operational problems.28:58–32:42 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Audience Q&A: Ideal Board Size and Managing Observers In response to an audience question about board bloat, Dan recommends capping board size at eight people for public companies. Spencer shares an experience sitting in a crowded 30-person board meeting and offers strategies to limit observers, while Scott notes customer observers can hinder open debate.32:42–39:18 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Audience Q&A: Meeting Cadence and CEO External Support Systems Bill Krauss details standard board agendas, while Scott offers a distinct opening tactic of starting meetings with a CEO highlights-and-issues slide. Aaron explains that CEOs should cultivate external peer networks rather than relying exclusively on the board for personal development.39:18–44:50 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Audience Q&A: Board Fiduciary Duties, Peer Networks, and Stage Alignment Dan Warmenhoven delivers a blunt reality check to the room, asserting that the board exists to serve the company and that CEOs are expendable. Scott differentiates between operational questions appropriate for board members versus vulnerable questions best reserved for an independent CEO coach.44:50–47:59 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Audience Q&A: Inter-Meeting Board Communications and Conclusion The panel discusses maintaining inter-meeting board communications, with Bill recommending monthly updates and Aaron advocating reusing internal company emails. Scott shares his own practice of sending 'notes from the road' to both his board and full team after field visits.0:00–2:01 · The host pushing back 0/10 Panel Introductions and Director Backgrounds Scott introduces the panel and shares his founder and board background at Ironport and A16Z. The guests briefly introduce their extensive private and public board histories in a collaborative manner.2:01–6:24 · The host pushing back 2/10 Audience Survey and Early-Stage Board Composition Strategies Scott proposes a strict rule of thumb to add one CEO for every VC added to early-stage boards. Dan Warmenhoven mildly disagrees, arguing that more than one outsider before Series B creates too many mouths to feed, leading Scott to clarify his ratio framework.6:24–10:34 · The host pushing back 0/10 Selecting Directors: Generalist Experience vs. Domain Expertise Aaron Levie explains Box's evolution from needing flexible early investors to domain-specific board members like GE's former CIO. Dan underscores the necessity of generalist operating experience early over specialized domain expertise, with Scott adding that early directors function as CEO coaches.10:34–13:43 · The host pushing back 0/10 Constructing Board Diversity and Vetting Venture Partners Spencer Rascoff compares board construction to assembling a baseball team of diverse skill sets to keep management honest. Bill Krauss and Spencer emphasize vetting the individual VC partner rather than just the VC firm brand, prompting Scott to discuss conducting reference checks.13:43–18:53 · The host pushing back 0/10 Structuring Board Meetings and CEO Leadership Scott sets up board meeting preparation with the metaphor that boards eat whatever management serves them. Dan and Bill outline practical guidelines for leading boards, maintaining concise decks, avoiding dense slides, and delivering bad news quickly.18:53–23:57 · The host pushing back 0/10 Executive Attendance, Memo Formats, and Meeting Tactics Aaron Levie discusses using executive participation to drive team accountability and detect scale issues. Spencer Rascoff details transitioning from slide decks to narrative memo formats and managing executive invitations thoughtfully.23:57–28:58 · The host pushing back 2/10 Normalizing Executive Sessions and Classroom Dynamics Scott forcefully interrupts Spencer to strongly advocate for executive sessions without the CEO, explaining that normalizing them prevents directors from conspiring outside meetings. Scott contrasts open, productive meetings with secretive ones where management hides critical operational problems.28:58–32:42 · The host pushing back 0/10 Audience Q&A: Ideal Board Size and Managing Observers In response to an audience question about board bloat, Dan recommends capping board size at eight people for public companies. Spencer shares an experience sitting in a crowded 30-person board meeting and offers strategies to limit observers, while Scott notes customer observers can hinder open debate.32:42–39:18 · The host pushing back 1/10 Audience Q&A: Meeting Cadence and CEO External Support Systems Bill Krauss details standard board agendas, while Scott offers a distinct opening tactic of starting meetings with a CEO highlights-and-issues slide. Aaron explains that CEOs should cultivate external peer networks rather than relying exclusively on the board for personal development.39:18–44:50 · The host pushing back 1/10 Audience Q&A: Board Fiduciary Duties, Peer Networks, and Stage Alignment Dan Warmenhoven delivers a blunt reality check to the room, asserting that the board exists to serve the company and that CEOs are expendable. Scott differentiates between operational questions appropriate for board members versus vulnerable questions best reserved for an independent CEO coach.44:50–47:59 · The host pushing back 0/10 Audience Q&A: Inter-Meeting Board Communications and Conclusion The panel discusses maintaining inter-meeting board communications, with Bill recommending monthly updates and Aaron advocating reusing internal company emails. Scott shares his own practice of sending 'notes from the road' to both his board and full team after field visits.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%0:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%36:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%36:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%39:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%39:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%42:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%42:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%45:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%45:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%48:00 · the host 0% · guest 0%48:00 · the host 0% · guest 0%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 4:18 Dan Warmenhoven dissents from Scott's board expansion rule

Dan directly pushes back on Scott's recommended ratio of adding a CEO for every VC, arguing that having more than one independent director early creates too many mouths to feed.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 23:57 Scott Weiss interjects to forcefully defend executive sessions

Scott halts Spencer mid-sentence to strongly insist that scheduled executive sessions are essential to prevent board members from holding backchannel meetings behind the CEO's back.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 39:18 Dan Warmenhoven reframes the fiduciary mandate of boards

Dan firmly corrects room assumptions about director roles, reminding founders that the board exists to protect the enterprise rather than support the CEO personally, making the CEO expendable.

The host holds their own ▶ 46:27 Scott Weiss outlines his 'notes from the road' communication framework

Scott demonstrates seasoned CEO operating expertise by explaining how he drafted raw customer field updates on flights back from trips to keep both directors and internal staff aligned.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
Panel Introductions and Director Backgrounds 2100 Scott introduces the panel and shares his founder and board background at Ironport and A16Z. The guests briefly introduce their extensive private and public board histories in a collaborative manner.
Audience Survey and Early-Stage Board Composition Strategies 4322 Scott proposes a strict rule of thumb to add one CEO for every VC added to early-stage boards. Dan Warmenhoven mildly disagrees, arguing that more than one outsider before Series B creates too many mouths to feed, leading Scott to clarify his ratio framework.
Selecting Directors: Generalist Experience vs. Domain Expertise 3210 Aaron Levie explains Box's evolution from needing flexible early investors to domain-specific board members like GE's former CIO. Dan underscores the necessity of generalist operating experience early over specialized domain expertise, with Scott adding that early directors function as CEO coaches.
Constructing Board Diversity and Vetting Venture Partners 3210 Spencer Rascoff compares board construction to assembling a baseball team of diverse skill sets to keep management honest. Bill Krauss and Spencer emphasize vetting the individual VC partner rather than just the VC firm brand, prompting Scott to discuss conducting reference checks.
Structuring Board Meetings and CEO Leadership 3310 Scott sets up board meeting preparation with the metaphor that boards eat whatever management serves them. Dan and Bill outline practical guidelines for leading boards, maintaining concise decks, avoiding dense slides, and delivering bad news quickly.
Executive Attendance, Memo Formats, and Meeting Tactics 2300 Aaron Levie discusses using executive participation to drive team accountability and detect scale issues. Spencer Rascoff details transitioning from slide decks to narrative memo formats and managing executive invitations thoughtfully.
Normalizing Executive Sessions and Classroom Dynamics 5212 Scott forcefully interrupts Spencer to strongly advocate for executive sessions without the CEO, explaining that normalizing them prevents directors from conspiring outside meetings. Scott contrasts open, productive meetings with secretive ones where management hides critical operational problems.
Audience Q&A: Ideal Board Size and Managing Observers 3210 In response to an audience question about board bloat, Dan recommends capping board size at eight people for public companies. Spencer shares an experience sitting in a crowded 30-person board meeting and offers strategies to limit observers, while Scott notes customer observers can hinder open debate.
Audience Q&A: Meeting Cadence and CEO External Support Systems 4311 Bill Krauss details standard board agendas, while Scott offers a distinct opening tactic of starting meetings with a CEO highlights-and-issues slide. Aaron explains that CEOs should cultivate external peer networks rather than relying exclusively on the board for personal development.
Audience Q&A: Board Fiduciary Duties, Peer Networks, and Stage Alignment 4521 Dan Warmenhoven delivers a blunt reality check to the room, asserting that the board exists to serve the company and that CEOs are expendable. Scott differentiates between operational questions appropriate for board members versus vulnerable questions best reserved for an independent CEO coach.
Audience Q&A: Inter-Meeting Board Communications and Conclusion 4200 The panel discusses maintaining inter-meeting board communications, with Bill recommending monthly updates and Aaron advocating reusing internal company emails. Scott shares his own practice of sending 'notes from the road' to both his board and full team after field visits.

Statements from this episode (28)

Insight
Weiss: Balance every VC board member with an experienced CEO director
“I always kind of had a rule of thumb, like every time a VC joined my board, I'd add a CEO.”
Scott Weiss Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 3:00
Opinion
Warmenhoven: Adding more than one outside director before Series B is excessive
“Any more than one outsider until you get to Series B is maybe too many mouths to feed.”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 4:21
Insight
Warmenhoven: Former operators on boards effectively mediate between competing VCs
“Having somebody who's actually been an operating guy, et cetera, I think has got a lot of value, and they also can be a mediary between the various venture capitalists and ways that a CEO can't, right?”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 4:31
Assertion Supported
Levie: Box added former GE CIO to board to target large enterprises
“So as an example two to three years ago we were really going into the large end of the enterprise, and so the person that we selected to bring on the board was the previous CIO of General Electric.”
Aaron Levie Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 8:54
Insight
Warmenhoven: Early-stage boards should prioritize operating generalists over domain experts
“I wouldn't focus early on, on domain expertise or whatever. I'd focus on trying to find somebody who's been an experienced operating guy, or person, woman and who really can add to the evolution, if you will, of your business model. Not so much domain expertis…”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 9:45
Insight
Rascoff: Domain expert directors keep management honest and thoroughly prepared
“It's more that in the boardroom, It keeps the conversation on that topic much more honest, and it forces the management team to become much more prepared, because the, they know they can't snow the director on that particular topic. Maybe they can snow the oth…”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 11:21
Insight
Rascoff: VC firm brand matters far less than individual board partner
“And don't just think about the Brand of the VC. Because once the check clears, that doesn't really matter that much. What matters is who's in the boardroom for the next 10 years.”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 12:46
Insight
Weiss: Boards scrutinize every number management puts on a slide
“The board eats whatever you serve them, and so you are the one that's preparing the meal and putting it in front of them, but you know, if you put up a slide with a bunch of numbers, they're going to ask you about every single number on that slide, right?”
Scott Weiss Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 13:55
Insight
Warmenhoven: Best board meetings minimize routine updates to discuss strategic issues
“I find the best meetings are those which are very succinct around mundane, And leave lots of time for the meaty subjects.”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 16:13
Insight
Krauss: Sending board decks on time reveals a CEO's execution capacity
“One of the things I use to judge the capabilities of the CEO is, can they get their shit together and get the board package out in some reasonable amount of time, two to three days in advance? If you get it the night before, and if you can't manage getting the…”
Bill Krauss Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 18:02
Insight
Levie: Bringing executive team to board meetings drives execution and accountability
“Including executives, ah, in, in obviously sessions at the board meeting, it's a great way to create accountability for other members of the team and it drives, ah, you know, that drives execution”
Aaron Levie Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 19:48
Disclosure
Rascoff: Zillow mandates board materials be sent 48 hours in advance
“We require decks have to get out or memos or whatever, 48 hours ahead of time. You know, if possible, 72 hours, but 48 is the absolute... Latest.”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:24
Disclosure
Rascoff: Zillow replaced board PowerPoint decks with Amazon-style written memos
“We switched about a year ago to a memo system after Bezos and Amazon's model of kind of no PowerPoint for one or two meetings in a row.”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:34
Insight
Rascoff: Inviting executives to board meetings creates a hard-to-reverse precedent
“Once you start inviting executives to board meetings, it's really hard to get them out.”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 22:48
Insight
Weiss: Regular executive sessions stop board members from conspiring offline
“Because it's like with every board I'm on after a period of time, I try to convince the CEO that it's a good idea because the first, like when I first walk in, It's normally like, what? You're gonna be talking about me, like, when I'm not here? But the implied…”
Scott Weiss Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 23:57
Insight
Warmenhoven: Co-founders and direct reports must be excluded from board executive sessions
“Since all those issues are performance related, it's really awkward to have one of the CEOs direct reports in the room. And you find a lot of board structures that start off with a CEO and a technical founder or whatever, a co-founder. Get them off. Get them o…”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 24:57
Insight
Rascoff: Board members dialing in via phone are effectively useless
“I hate when I have to dial into a, to a board call, and I hate when people are on the phone. I just think it, You know, we all know they're only half paying attention. We all know that, you know, it's hard for them to hear, and papers are shuffling and whateve…”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 27:56
Insight
Rascoff: Bad news must be shared before board meetings to avoid surprises
“The biggest sign of a bad board meeting is one where there's, there are a lot of surprises. Like, if you've got bad news to share, for example, you want to share it ahead of time, and you want to make sure that you know, bad news should travel faster than good…”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 28:16
Insight
Warmenhoven: The ideal public company board size is exactly eight directors
“Once you're public, I would guess it's probably about eight, the CEO plus seven others. I mean, you gotta have financial experts and comp committees and all the rest of that stuff, but any more than eight is just, I mean, it's just too many.”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 29:26
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Rascoff: Zulily's first board meeting had 30 attendees due to observers
“So when I showed up the first time at the first Zulily board meeting, there were literally 30 people there or something, because it was a hot company about to go public. Everyone was there with their observer seat, and their assistant, and their associate, and…”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 29:52
Insight
Weiss: Customer board observers inhibit open discussion of company issues
“Where you try to get like a customer on your board, you know, like where, where they'd want an observer seat if they do a strategic round, somebody, Like, you know, I won't name any names, but sometimes that can alter what you say in the board meeting. You kno…”
Scott Weiss Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 31:10
Insight
Warmenhoven: Start board meetings with an unscripted, closed-door CEO report
“I encourage every CEO of every board I'm on to start the meeting that way. It's a private meeting. It's a closed-door session. It's a CEO report. What it's labeled as is no materials in advance. It's all verbal.”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 36:47
Disclosure
Levie: Box has never conducted a formal board search
“We've never done a board search. What we've done is, is built advisors around the company, gotten close to lots of people I've personally engaged with, you know, 50 or so CEOs that have been through very similar problems over, over, you know, similar eras of t…”
Aaron Levie Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 37:57
Insight
Warmenhoven: Boards exist for company success, not CEO personal development
“The board is not there to help you be successful. The board is there to help the company be successful. You are expendable. Just keep that in mind. The amount of time you should spend on your personal development in a board meeting is zero.”
Dan Warmenhoven Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 39:20
Insight
Weiss: CEOs should ask vulnerable questions to coaches, not board members
“I would also recommend that there are things that you don't want to share with board members that you'd want to have a mentor or a CEO coach that you can ask those stupid questions with. So they're, you know, like, I think there's a range of questions that I f…”
Scott Weiss Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 42:23
Insight
Rascoff: Early-stage VCs were more helpful than Fortune 500 CEOs in 2008
“I'm thinking back to 2008 when, you know, the world came to an end. The directors that were most helpful to us working through that were the VCs that had a lot of early stage experience and had seen a lot of other companies die. It wasn't the marquee, you know…”
Spencer Rascoff Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 44:19
Insight
Krauss: Monthly board updates force CEOs to clarify strategic thinking
“A monthly letter from the CEO is very helpful. Both for, more, equally for you as the CEO, because it forces you, I think Spencer may have said, or Aaron may have said, but, you know, forces you to put your thoughts together in a, you know, cohesive way.”
Bill Krauss Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 45:22
Insight
Levie: CEOs should forward existing internal company notes to boards
“You can actually find lots of ways to leverage communication you're already doing. So, like, we send a company all hands note monthly, and that is, sort of, lays out the strategy or whatever. Just literally forwarding that to the board of, FYI, here's the late…”
Aaron Levie Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 45:51
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.