Jan 2, 2019 · 33m · a16z

a16z Podcast | So Where Are We on the 'S-curve' for PC Devices?

Steven Sinofsky · 15m spoken Benedict Evans · 14m spoken Sonal Chokshi · 51s spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of the a16z Podcast, Benedict Evans and Steven Sinofsky analyze major hardware announcements from Google, Apple, and Microsoft to explore technological S-curves, platform architectural transitions from x86 to ARM, and evolving user interface paradigms.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The host holds 2.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 0.0 Guest teaching 2.2 Guest disagreement 1.3 The host pushing back 0.0
05100:0010:0020:0030:000:55–6:51 · The host as informed peer 0/10 Recent Hardware Announcements & Ecosystem Shifts This segment is a peer conversation between tech analysts Steven Sinofsky and Benedict Evans without active host participation, keeping host expertise and pushback at 0. The guests collaboratively analyze hardware announcements from Apple, Google, and Microsoft, discussing ecosystem fragmentation and OEM dynamics.6:51–10:53 · The host as informed peer 0/10 Hardware Pricing, Margins, and Executive Reach Sinofsky explains profit margin differences between software and hardware companies using the Dodge Viper analogy. The discussion remains conversational and highly agreeable between the two speakers without host involvement.10:53–14:48 · The host as informed peer 0/10 Understanding the S-Curve: Intel/x86 vs ARM/Mobile Evans breaks down technological S-curves using a piston engine vs jet transition analogy to frame PC versus mobile ARM development. Evans playfully calls out Microsoft for missing the mobile revolution, which Sinofsky humorously defends.14:48–21:11 · The host as informed peer 0/10 Platform Transitions and Lessons from Windows & iOS Sinofsky provides insider expertise on leading Windows through platform transitions, detailing the architectural challenges of moving from x86 to ARM and mouse to touch. The dynamic is reflective and collaborative.21:11–26:21 · The host as informed peer 0/10 Apple Touch Bar and Incremental Innovation Evans shares first-hand impressions from Apple's Touch Bar demo event, while Sinofsky frames the feature as incremental innovation on a mature platform curve. Both speakers agree on developer constraints regarding Touch Bar UI implementation.26:21–28:18 · The host as informed peer 0/10 Surface Studio, Pen Inputs, and Targeted User Bases Evans questions Microsoft's value proposition for the Surface Studio pen and dial inputs for general users, noting they primarily benefit professional illustrators. Sinofsky concurs and elaborates on how modern work is shifting toward mobile workflows.0:55–6:51 · Guest teaching 1/10 Recent Hardware Announcements & Ecosystem Shifts This segment is a peer conversation between tech analysts Steven Sinofsky and Benedict Evans without active host participation, keeping host expertise and pushback at 0. The guests collaboratively analyze hardware announcements from Apple, Google, and Microsoft, discussing ecosystem fragmentation and OEM dynamics.6:51–10:53 · Guest teaching 2/10 Hardware Pricing, Margins, and Executive Reach Sinofsky explains profit margin differences between software and hardware companies using the Dodge Viper analogy. The discussion remains conversational and highly agreeable between the two speakers without host involvement.10:53–14:48 · Guest teaching 3/10 Understanding the S-Curve: Intel/x86 vs ARM/Mobile Evans breaks down technological S-curves using a piston engine vs jet transition analogy to frame PC versus mobile ARM development. Evans playfully calls out Microsoft for missing the mobile revolution, which Sinofsky humorously defends.14:48–21:11 · Guest teaching 3/10 Platform Transitions and Lessons from Windows & iOS Sinofsky provides insider expertise on leading Windows through platform transitions, detailing the architectural challenges of moving from x86 to ARM and mouse to touch. The dynamic is reflective and collaborative.21:11–26:21 · Guest teaching 2/10 Apple Touch Bar and Incremental Innovation Evans shares first-hand impressions from Apple's Touch Bar demo event, while Sinofsky frames the feature as incremental innovation on a mature platform curve. Both speakers agree on developer constraints regarding Touch Bar UI implementation.26:21–28:18 · Guest teaching 2/10 Surface Studio, Pen Inputs, and Targeted User Bases Evans questions Microsoft's value proposition for the Surface Studio pen and dial inputs for general users, noting they primarily benefit professional illustrators. Sinofsky concurs and elaborates on how modern work is shifting toward mobile workflows.0:55–6:51 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Recent Hardware Announcements & Ecosystem Shifts This segment is a peer conversation between tech analysts Steven Sinofsky and Benedict Evans without active host participation, keeping host expertise and pushback at 0. The guests collaboratively analyze hardware announcements from Apple, Google, and Microsoft, discussing ecosystem fragmentation and OEM dynamics.6:51–10:53 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Hardware Pricing, Margins, and Executive Reach Sinofsky explains profit margin differences between software and hardware companies using the Dodge Viper analogy. The discussion remains conversational and highly agreeable between the two speakers without host involvement.10:53–14:48 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Understanding the S-Curve: Intel/x86 vs ARM/Mobile Evans breaks down technological S-curves using a piston engine vs jet transition analogy to frame PC versus mobile ARM development. Evans playfully calls out Microsoft for missing the mobile revolution, which Sinofsky humorously defends.14:48–21:11 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Platform Transitions and Lessons from Windows & iOS Sinofsky provides insider expertise on leading Windows through platform transitions, detailing the architectural challenges of moving from x86 to ARM and mouse to touch. The dynamic is reflective and collaborative.21:11–26:21 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Apple Touch Bar and Incremental Innovation Evans shares first-hand impressions from Apple's Touch Bar demo event, while Sinofsky frames the feature as incremental innovation on a mature platform curve. Both speakers agree on developer constraints regarding Touch Bar UI implementation.26:21–28:18 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Surface Studio, Pen Inputs, and Targeted User Bases Evans questions Microsoft's value proposition for the Surface Studio pen and dial inputs for general users, noting they primarily benefit professional illustrators. Sinofsky concurs and elaborates on how modern work is shifting toward mobile workflows.0:55–6:51 · The host pushing back 0/10 Recent Hardware Announcements & Ecosystem Shifts This segment is a peer conversation between tech analysts Steven Sinofsky and Benedict Evans without active host participation, keeping host expertise and pushback at 0. The guests collaboratively analyze hardware announcements from Apple, Google, and Microsoft, discussing ecosystem fragmentation and OEM dynamics.6:51–10:53 · The host pushing back 0/10 Hardware Pricing, Margins, and Executive Reach Sinofsky explains profit margin differences between software and hardware companies using the Dodge Viper analogy. The discussion remains conversational and highly agreeable between the two speakers without host involvement.10:53–14:48 · The host pushing back 0/10 Understanding the S-Curve: Intel/x86 vs ARM/Mobile Evans breaks down technological S-curves using a piston engine vs jet transition analogy to frame PC versus mobile ARM development. Evans playfully calls out Microsoft for missing the mobile revolution, which Sinofsky humorously defends.14:48–21:11 · The host pushing back 0/10 Platform Transitions and Lessons from Windows & iOS Sinofsky provides insider expertise on leading Windows through platform transitions, detailing the architectural challenges of moving from x86 to ARM and mouse to touch. The dynamic is reflective and collaborative.21:11–26:21 · The host pushing back 0/10 Apple Touch Bar and Incremental Innovation Evans shares first-hand impressions from Apple's Touch Bar demo event, while Sinofsky frames the feature as incremental innovation on a mature platform curve. Both speakers agree on developer constraints regarding Touch Bar UI implementation.26:21–28:18 · The host pushing back 0/10 Surface Studio, Pen Inputs, and Targeted User Bases Evans questions Microsoft's value proposition for the Surface Studio pen and dial inputs for general users, noting they primarily benefit professional illustrators. Sinofsky concurs and elaborates on how modern work is shifting toward mobile workflows.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 30.3% · guest 69.7%0:00 · the host 30.3% · guest 69.7%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%30:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%33:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 13:50 Challenging Microsoft's Mobile Failure

Evans directly asserts that Microsoft failed and missed mobile, forcing Sinofsky to lightheartedly defend Microsoft's efforts.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 27:30 Refusing Surface Studio Mass-Market Framing

Evans rejects Microsoft's presentation that pen input improves general email or document tasks, insisting it only serves a narrow creative market.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 11:52 S-Curve Jet vs Piston Engine Analogy

Evans uses the transition from piston engines to jets to educate on how ARM mobile architecture is surpassing flattened PC innovation curves.

The host holds their own ▶ 24:10 Sinofsky Explains Legacy Codebase Constraints

Sinofsky leverages his deep Windows engineering background to explain why legacy desktop developers cannot easily rewrite complex apps for new input paradigms.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
Recent Hardware Announcements & Ecosystem Shifts 0110 This segment is a peer conversation between tech analysts Steven Sinofsky and Benedict Evans without active host participation, keeping host expertise and pushback at 0. The guests collaboratively analyze hardware announcements from Apple, Google, and Microsoft, discussing ecosystem fragmentation and OEM dynamics.
Hardware Pricing, Margins, and Executive Reach 0210 Sinofsky explains profit margin differences between software and hardware companies using the Dodge Viper analogy. The discussion remains conversational and highly agreeable between the two speakers without host involvement.
Understanding the S-Curve: Intel/x86 vs ARM/Mobile 0320 Evans breaks down technological S-curves using a piston engine vs jet transition analogy to frame PC versus mobile ARM development. Evans playfully calls out Microsoft for missing the mobile revolution, which Sinofsky humorously defends.
Platform Transitions and Lessons from Windows & iOS 0310 Sinofsky provides insider expertise on leading Windows through platform transitions, detailing the architectural challenges of moving from x86 to ARM and mouse to touch. The dynamic is reflective and collaborative.
Apple Touch Bar and Incremental Innovation 0210 Evans shares first-hand impressions from Apple's Touch Bar demo event, while Sinofsky frames the feature as incremental innovation on a mature platform curve. Both speakers agree on developer constraints regarding Touch Bar UI implementation.
Surface Studio, Pen Inputs, and Targeted User Bases 0220 Evans questions Microsoft's value proposition for the Surface Studio pen and dial inputs for general users, noting they primarily benefit professional illustrators. Sinofsky concurs and elaborates on how modern work is shifting toward mobile workflows.

Statements from this episode (17)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sinofsky: Apple created the standard template for sleek product walkthrough ads
“Apple sort of created the metaphor for doing the sleek ID walkthroughs”
Steven Sinofsky Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 1:13
Opinion
Evans: Apple's 2016 MacBook Pro update is largely an incremental speed bump
“Apple announced a upgrade to their laptops that people have been waiting for, and it's an upgrade. It's another speed bump with a new design with this interesting touch bar thing on it.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 1:28
Assertion Supported
Evans: Apple has 650 million iPhone users
“Apple's got six hundred and fifty million iPhone users.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 3:10
Opinion
Evans: Nokia Windows phones felt more premium than any Android device
“I actually always felt that the Nokia Windows phones felt more premium than any premium Android phone”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 6:24
Assertion Contradicted
Evans: 95% of Android devices ship with Google Mobile Services
“Well, 95% of devices have got GMS”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 9:04
Assertion Partly supported
Sinofsky: Late 2016 Apple and Microsoft PCs used year-old chips
“Well, in fact, all of the new devices that were announced this week are running components at least a year old, and in some cases, two years old. The graphics on, on the surface are the last generation of video, the CPUs on Intel, or the, I mean, on, on the Ma…”
Steven Sinofsky Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 11:35
Assertion Supported
Evans: Apple's 900M active iOS devices rival 1.5B global PCs
“There's only one and a half billion PCs on Earth, and Apple has nine hundred million iOS devices out there.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 13:09
Assertion Supported
Sinofsky: Apple's quarterly device sales match the entire global PC market
“And on a quarterly basis, Apple sells about the same number of, Apple sells the same number of devices as their RPCs sold.”
Steven Sinofsky Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 13:13
Insight
Sinofsky: Successful companies cannot publicly abandon their core legacy businesses
“It's very difficult if you're a big successful organization to stand up and tell the outside world the thing you love, And the thing that's all the business is not the thing we're going to worry about anymore. And you can't do that. Like that's the, that is th…”
Steven Sinofsky Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 18:22
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Sinofsky: PCs will become super expensive and niche like mainframes
“PCs are going to get super expensive now. Like, and everything about them is, it's just like buying a mainframe. Like, today, you can, if you're a big insurance company running mainframe software, you can hire programmers, you can get new features. It's just 1…”
Steven Sinofsky Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 19:10
Assertion Supported
Evans: MacBook Touch Bar is powered by an Apple Watch chip
“The technology underneath it is an OLED screen, and the chip That's driving it, apparently, is actually Apple Watch, basically.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:50
Insight
Sinofsky: Legacy desktop developers will not rewrite software for Touch Bar
“Cause they're actually no one doing that. All of those Are on the back of their S curve, and they're in sustain mode, and the last thing they're going to do is rewrite them”
Steven Sinofsky Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 23:55
Opinion
Evans: The MacBook is at the top of its S-curve
“The MacBook isn't changing what it is. The MacBook has been, is at the top of the S curve. This is better propellers on your Lockheed Constellation.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 25:43
Assertion Partly supported
Evans: Adobe Creative Cloud has 7 million subscribers vs. 1.5B PCs
“There's only seven million people subscribing to Creative Cloud, and there's one and a half billion PCs out there.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 27:41
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sinofsky: Average corporate employee spends under half their time at a desk
“Like the average person Employee at a company now is spending less than half their time at a desk, and when you start looking at the time that they're spending on working, like, it's all shifting to mobile.”
Steven Sinofsky Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 28:20
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Evans: Only 50 million of 1.5 billion PC users are power users
“There is this core group of people who live in Photoshop or live in Excel or live in Xcode, or live in whatever the, that is, add all of those people up, you get to maybe fifty million people out of one and a half billion PCs.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 29:40
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Evans: Business workflows will inexorably shift away from traditional PCs
“And that's, that will inexorably move away from PC, keyboard, mouse.”
Benedict Evans Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 32:13
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.