Jan 2, 2019 · 22m · a16z
a16z Podcast | The Internet Is Your Movement
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this a16z Podcast episode, Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Ben Horowitz and NationBuilder CEO Jim Gilliam discuss how digital technology and software disrupt traditional political gatekeeping, transform campaign messaging, and enable decentralized citizen self-governance.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →
The host as informed peer 4.5 Guest teaching 4.5 Guest disagreement 1.0 The host pushing back 2.7
speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 14:07 Jim defends neutral platform principles despite employee opposition
Jim strongly defends hosting controversial figures like Trump, arguing that deciding who has the right to organize is a dangerous slippery slope that threatens democratic foundation.
Hardest push from the host ▶ 11:41 Ben challenges Jim's view of internet unity with balkanization realityBen refuses to accept Jim's optimistic framing of the internet as connected humanity, arguing forcefully that online networks are actually balkanizing people into isolated echo chambers.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 3:18 Jim details how party gatekeeping controlled voter filesJim educates the host on how political party monopolies restricted access to central voter databases, explaining how NationBuilder disrupted this system by distributing free national voter files.
The host holds their own ▶ 7:09 Ben cites specific television advertisement focus percentagesBen demonstrates deep knowledge of campaign strategy by quoting precise statistical post-election analysis showing 100% of Clinton's ads targeted Trump while only 10.2% of Trump's targeted Clinton.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | The host as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | The host pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Political Disruption and Democratizing the Voter File | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Ben asks Jim to clarify the significance of the voter file after Jim quickly introduces disruption theory in campaigns. Jim explains how traditional parties controlled access to voter databases and how NationBuilder democratized campaign software for low-cost candidates. | |
| Efficacy of Campaign Spending vs. Resonant Messaging | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ben asks how candidates win if traditional party backing, media endorsements, and massive ad spending no longer guarantee victory. Jim explains that resonant messaging and turning digital attention into real-world action matters far more than tech budget. | |
| Analyzing Clinton and Trump Campaign Strategies | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Ben demonstrates solid expertise by citing post-election analysis metrics, noting that 100% of Clinton's ads mentioned Trump compared to only 10.2% of Trump's mentioning Clinton. Jim explains Clinton's technocratic approach versus Trump's intuitive connection with voter energy. | |
| Internet Bubbles, Polarization, and Platform Neutrality | 5 | 4 | 2 | 6 | Ben directly challenges Jim's optimistic spiritual take on the internet by pointing out growing online balkanization and echo chambers. Ben also probes how NationBuilder's staff handled building software used by Trump, prompting Jim to defend platform neutrality. | |
| Rethinking Representative Democracy and Electoral Systems | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | Ben questions whether traditional representative democracy is flawed given recent populist volatility, asking if filtered systems are better than raw majority rule. Jim explains that majoritarian elections create fundamental conflict and envisions direct action outside traditional politics. | |
| Decentralized Governance and Direct Citizen Action | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | Ben prompts Jim for a concrete example of citizens replacing government functions. Jim shares the story of local Hawaiian residents fixing a state park bridge in eight days for free after the government quoted eight million dollars and a two-year delay. |
Statements from this episode (13)
Horowitz: NationBuilder software powered 40% of 2016 national campaigns
“NationBuilder, the platform that Jim's company builds, was the underlying software that 40% of the national campaigns in this election ran on, including four of the five presidential candidates, including President-elect Trump.”
Horowitz: Mainstream media and political parties had zero impact on 2016 election
“The mainstream media had No impact on the election. The political party had no impact on the election”
Gilliam: All outsider 2016 presidential candidates used NationBuilder
“All of the outsider presidential candidates used NationBuilder.”
Gilliam: Clinton spent eight times more on software than Trump
“Hillary Clinton spent eight times more on software than Donald Trump did.”
Gilliam: Democratic political software is a monopoly, unlike Republican tech
“In general, the Democrats have one system. There's a monopoly behind it. Everybody has to use one system. On the Republican side, it's much more, there's a lot more competition.”
Gilliam: NationBuilder was first to make national voter files free
“We compiled the voter file nationally and started to provide it for free, offering software for 29 bucks a month to go run for office. First time anybody's ever done that. Provide it for free to anybody running for office, even if you don't use Nation Boulder.”
Gilliam: Building custom tech distracts campaigns from developing resonant messages
“What we've seen is that, like, the campaigns that spend an awful lot of time putting together the technology in different ways, they lose sight of, like, oh, what is the actual message that's going to reach people?”
Horowitz: 100% of Clinton's TV ads mentioned Trump, versus Trump's 10%
“So in the presidential campaign, I've been reading everything, like all the post-game analysis, and one of the things that really struck me was in Hillary's television advertisements, or in Donald Trump's television advertisements, 10.2% of his ads mentioned H…”
Horowitz: Mainstream media attacks tech because it lost gatekeeping power
“Facebook is getting attacked, you know, the internet's getting attacked by the mainstream media. You know, they, they've lost the power, so that's not that surprising, but.”
Gilliam: Deep, meaningful understanding between opposing views is impossible online
“We have to, like, very intentionally figure out ways for people to come together and start to hear and understand each other in ways that are really deeply meaningful. It's impossible, I believe, to occur at all online at this point.”
Gilliam: Restricting who can use political platforms is a dangerous slippery slope
“If we start to decide who has the right to run for office, or who has the right to lead, or who has the right to organize, it's a really, really slippery slope.”
Gilliam: Internet systems will make traditional elections and government irrelevant
“But I think as more and more people do that, you know, the institutions of elections and politics and even government will become less and less relevant to people's lives as completely new systems are built by leaders outside of that system creating something …”