Sep 18, 2023 · 18m · a16z

Living Up the Promise of A True Second Brain with Nat Eliason

Nat Eliason · 11m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of the a16z podcast, host and guest Nat Eliason critically evaluate personal knowledge management tools, debunking productivity myths while exploring how generative AI could finally fulfill the promise of a true second brain.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 2.8 Guest teaching 4.2 Guest disagreement 1.0 The host pushing back 1.0
05100:0010:000:37–3:48 · The host as informed peer 1/10 Title Card and Motion Graphic Transition The host opens with an extended thesis framing the evolution of knowledge management and AI before asking a gentle introductory question. Nat responds conversationally about his early entry into productivity culture without friction.3:48–6:59 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Dissecting False Productivity and Note-Taking Realities Nat explains the correlation versus causation fallacy of productivity tools, noting that collecting highlights rarely improved his output. The host synthesizes his points by offering the stone tablet analogy to highlight how minimal tool features actually matter.6:59–11:02 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Hierarchical Folders versus Interconnected Knowledge Graphs Nat educates on why hierarchical folders fail compared to interconnected bi-directional knowledge graphs like Roam. The host engages interactively, agreeing on the frustration of multi-layered folder trees and sharing her own experience with Evernote.11:02–13:49 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Digital Hoarding and Marketing Promises vs. Historical Reality The host offers a strong conceptual frame comparing digital note accumulation to physical hoarding and asks whether tools fail due to tech limitations or flawed human expectations. Nat strongly dismisses software promises, noting great books were written on typewriters, which the host immediately reinforces.13:49–17:49 · The host as informed peer 2/10 The AI Frontier: Custom GPTs and Content Augmentation Nat details his vision for LLM custom embeds indexing personal notes and facilitating multi-format content generation across social platforms. The host prompts with open-ended forward-looking questions while allowing the guest to lead the technical vision.0:37–3:48 · Guest teaching 1/10 Title Card and Motion Graphic Transition The host opens with an extended thesis framing the evolution of knowledge management and AI before asking a gentle introductory question. Nat responds conversationally about his early entry into productivity culture without friction.3:48–6:59 · Guest teaching 4/10 Dissecting False Productivity and Note-Taking Realities Nat explains the correlation versus causation fallacy of productivity tools, noting that collecting highlights rarely improved his output. The host synthesizes his points by offering the stone tablet analogy to highlight how minimal tool features actually matter.6:59–11:02 · Guest teaching 5/10 Hierarchical Folders versus Interconnected Knowledge Graphs Nat educates on why hierarchical folders fail compared to interconnected bi-directional knowledge graphs like Roam. The host engages interactively, agreeing on the frustration of multi-layered folder trees and sharing her own experience with Evernote.11:02–13:49 · Guest teaching 5/10 Digital Hoarding and Marketing Promises vs. Historical Reality The host offers a strong conceptual frame comparing digital note accumulation to physical hoarding and asks whether tools fail due to tech limitations or flawed human expectations. Nat strongly dismisses software promises, noting great books were written on typewriters, which the host immediately reinforces.13:49–17:49 · Guest teaching 6/10 The AI Frontier: Custom GPTs and Content Augmentation Nat details his vision for LLM custom embeds indexing personal notes and facilitating multi-format content generation across social platforms. The host prompts with open-ended forward-looking questions while allowing the guest to lead the technical vision.0:37–3:48 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Title Card and Motion Graphic Transition The host opens with an extended thesis framing the evolution of knowledge management and AI before asking a gentle introductory question. Nat responds conversationally about his early entry into productivity culture without friction.3:48–6:59 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Dissecting False Productivity and Note-Taking Realities Nat explains the correlation versus causation fallacy of productivity tools, noting that collecting highlights rarely improved his output. The host synthesizes his points by offering the stone tablet analogy to highlight how minimal tool features actually matter.6:59–11:02 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Hierarchical Folders versus Interconnected Knowledge Graphs Nat educates on why hierarchical folders fail compared to interconnected bi-directional knowledge graphs like Roam. The host engages interactively, agreeing on the frustration of multi-layered folder trees and sharing her own experience with Evernote.11:02–13:49 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Digital Hoarding and Marketing Promises vs. Historical Reality The host offers a strong conceptual frame comparing digital note accumulation to physical hoarding and asks whether tools fail due to tech limitations or flawed human expectations. Nat strongly dismisses software promises, noting great books were written on typewriters, which the host immediately reinforces.13:49–17:49 · Guest disagreement 0/10 The AI Frontier: Custom GPTs and Content Augmentation Nat details his vision for LLM custom embeds indexing personal notes and facilitating multi-format content generation across social platforms. The host prompts with open-ended forward-looking questions while allowing the guest to lead the technical vision.0:37–3:48 · The host pushing back 0/10 Title Card and Motion Graphic Transition The host opens with an extended thesis framing the evolution of knowledge management and AI before asking a gentle introductory question. Nat responds conversationally about his early entry into productivity culture without friction.3:48–6:59 · The host pushing back 1/10 Dissecting False Productivity and Note-Taking Realities Nat explains the correlation versus causation fallacy of productivity tools, noting that collecting highlights rarely improved his output. The host synthesizes his points by offering the stone tablet analogy to highlight how minimal tool features actually matter.6:59–11:02 · The host pushing back 1/10 Hierarchical Folders versus Interconnected Knowledge Graphs Nat educates on why hierarchical folders fail compared to interconnected bi-directional knowledge graphs like Roam. The host engages interactively, agreeing on the frustration of multi-layered folder trees and sharing her own experience with Evernote.11:02–13:49 · The host pushing back 3/10 Digital Hoarding and Marketing Promises vs. Historical Reality The host offers a strong conceptual frame comparing digital note accumulation to physical hoarding and asks whether tools fail due to tech limitations or flawed human expectations. Nat strongly dismisses software promises, noting great books were written on typewriters, which the host immediately reinforces.13:49–17:49 · The host pushing back 0/10 The AI Frontier: Custom GPTs and Content Augmentation Nat details his vision for LLM custom embeds indexing personal notes and facilitating multi-format content generation across social platforms. The host prompts with open-ended forward-looking questions while allowing the guest to lead the technical vision.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%0:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 12:40 Typewriter reality check on writing tools

Nat forcefully rejects the premise that complex knowledge tools are needed for high-quality output, asserting that anyone who thinks they need a special app to write a book is simply wrong.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 13:01 Host validates historical rejection of tool necessity

Steph jumps in to validate Nat's point, citing historical precedent to explicitly declare that productivity software promises are untrue.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 3:59 Exposing the causation vs correlation flaw

Nat reframes the host's inquiry on tool utility by explaining that people confuse correlation with causation when copying habits of successful creators.

The host holds their own ▶ 11:02 Digital hoarding conceptual framing

Steph articulately introduces the digital hoarding analogy to challenge the fundamental utility of modern note-taking apps before questioning human misunderstandings of human cognition.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
Title Card and Motion Graphic Transition 1100 The host opens with an extended thesis framing the evolution of knowledge management and AI before asking a gentle introductory question. Nat responds conversationally about his early entry into productivity culture without friction.
Dissecting False Productivity and Note-Taking Realities 3411 Nat explains the correlation versus causation fallacy of productivity tools, noting that collecting highlights rarely improved his output. The host synthesizes his points by offering the stone tablet analogy to highlight how minimal tool features actually matter.
Hierarchical Folders versus Interconnected Knowledge Graphs 3511 Nat educates on why hierarchical folders fail compared to interconnected bi-directional knowledge graphs like Roam. The host engages interactively, agreeing on the frustration of multi-layered folder trees and sharing her own experience with Evernote.
Digital Hoarding and Marketing Promises vs. Historical Reality 5533 The host offers a strong conceptual frame comparing digital note accumulation to physical hoarding and asks whether tools fail due to tech limitations or flawed human expectations. Nat strongly dismisses software promises, noting great books were written on typewriters, which the host immediately reinforces.
The AI Frontier: Custom GPTs and Content Augmentation 2600 Nat details his vision for LLM custom embeds indexing personal notes and facilitating multi-format content generation across social platforms. The host prompts with open-ended forward-looking questions while allowing the guest to lead the technical vision.

Statements from this episode (8)

Opinion
Nat Eliason: Early enthusiasm for note-taking tool Roam Research was a mania
“And then in particular with Roam, for those who remember that, that It was really like a mania, I think.”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 3:22
Insight
Nat Eliason: The software used to store book highlights does not matter
“The medium that I organize those highlights in doesn't seem to matter because I had them in text files at one point, I had them in Evernote, I had them in Notion, I had them in Rome, I had them in back in Notion, right?”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 5:08
Insight
Nat Eliason: Most personal knowledge management features are false-productivity distractions
“Well, yes, I think it's really the searching, the indexing and the collecting that are very helpful, but pretty much all of the other features are often like get in the way or become distractions or give you this sense of productivity, right?”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 6:00
Insight
Nat Eliason: You can delete 99% of your digital notes without consequence
“But what you will probably find is that you can delete 95 to 99% of everything you have in Evernote or Notion or whatever and never feel that pain for the rest of your life.”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 10:52
Opinion
Nat Eliason: Organizing digital notes does not improve writing or happiness
“And I think the false promise that many of us Believe or have bought into or whatever is that if you organize information, you will write better articles. You will make more money. You will be happier. You will get all of these benefits from it, right? And tha…”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 12:23
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Nat Eliason: 99.9% of the best books were written without writing software
“You know, I make this analogy all the time that 99.9% of the best books ever written were written on a typewriter or by hand. Like, if you think that you need a good writing app to write your book, you're just wrong. Like, it, it's just not true.”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 12:47
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Nat Eliason: The next big utility is AI-embedded note-taking tools
“I really think the next big utility is going to be a note taking tool that offers custom GPT or whatever embeds as a service. For your knowledge graph.”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 13:50
Disclosure
Nat Eliason: I would pay $1,000 for AI-embedded personal note tools
“Theoretically, any note-taking app should be able to offer that as a service, or maybe you pay, you know, I, I'd pay like a thousand dollars or more for this, right? Very happily.”
Nat Eliason Sep 18, 2023 ▶ 14:18
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.