why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Anthropic will die within 12 months if complacent on Claude Code
“If Anthropic thinks cloud code is already a win, In six or 12 months from now, they won't even be around.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Sierra engineers report 3x to 20x productivity boost from AI agents
“We have software engineers who are completely AI-pilled and using Cloud Code, Codex, our own internal agent we call Pinecone that we used to run much of the company on, and they estimate they are between three and 20 times more productive in terms of features …”
Assertion Supported
Lloyd: Warp has 700,000 users, outpacing Claude Code and OpenAI Codex
“We have way, way more users than Cloud Code, for instance, or Codex. We have 700,000 users because we've been doing this for Five years.”
Disclosure
Legora's engineering team uses both Cloud Code and Cursor
“It's Cloud Code, it's Cursor.”
Disclosure
Adam Foroughi: AppLovin Engineers Mainly Use Cloud Code, With Declining Cursor Usage
“Most people are on Cloud Code. Codex is utilized as well, and Cursor less of these days.”
Disclosure
Mercor engineers rely heavily on Cursor, Claude Code, and Cognition
“Like, the amount of utility that our engineers get from Cursor and Cloud Code and Cognition is incredible, and same thing for-”
Disclosure
FOMO Mandates Enterprise AI Tools to Safeguard Proprietary Code
“Yeah, so we have an internal AI policy to make sure that we're only using enterprise account, that there's not sensitive things being uploaded, etc. I think that's really important. And then within those guidelines, most of our engineers are using cloud code a…”