The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Noam Lovinsky no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ · coarse estimate ≈4.5/5 from 32 produced feed exchanges record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
32exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 4 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.60

Q time, great, we'll pay 30% of salary. Because otherwise, we're still paying the per seat 25 bucks a month, and then the TAM doesn't expand. Can you help me understand? Are we gonna see the expansion of TAM with the movement of that software spend to human labor spend? Or are we all getting way too high on our own supply, and we're gonna stay in a software spend world?

A I mean, I, I guess like TAM expansion that I see is that the number of problems, the number of things that you're able to solve with software and do for, do for people, it's just, it's just going to expand. And so, yes, will you be able to have smaller teams, like kind of more, more productive doing more? Will that change kind of like the, the OPEX accounting fundamentals that are like, yes, but I, I think then like what happens is that you expand through just Providing more service. Solving more problems. And does that lead to, like, basically fewer bigger firms? I don't know, perhaps. Like, maybe there are too many providers, and what you actually need is fewer providers that just do more and cover much more, much more of the stack.

AI assessment note: “TAM expansion that I see is that the number of problems... going to expand”

Answered produced feed D 4 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 3.60

Q time, great, we'll pay 30% of salary. Because otherwise, we're still paying the per seat 25 bucks a month, and then the TAM doesn't expand. Can you help me understand? Are we gonna see the expansion of TAM with the movement of that software spend to human labor spend? Or are we all getting way too high on our own supply, and we're gonna stay in a software spend world?

A I mean, I, I guess like TAM expansion that I see is that the number of problems, the number of things that you're able to solve with software and do for, do for people, it's just, it's just going to expand. And so, yes, will you be able to have smaller teams, like kind of more, more productive doing more? Will that change kind of like the, the OPEX accounting fundamentals that are like, yes, but I, I think then like what happens is that you expand through just Providing more service. Solving more problems. And does that lead to, like, basically fewer bigger firms? I don't know, perhaps. Like, maybe there are too many providers, and what you actually need is fewer providers that just do more and cover much more, much more of the stack.

AI assessment note: “TAM expansion that I see is that the number of problems... is just going to expand”

← previous page 2
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.