Nov 12, 2020 · 44m · 20vc
20VC: Accel's Dan Levine on The Current State of Seed & Series A, The Rise of Pre-Emptive Rounds, Solo Capitalists and Multi-Stage Funds Entering Seed & Market, People and Product; What To Prioritise?
0:00 / 0:00
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Accel Partner Daniel Levine about his path from founder to investor, core frameworks for seed and Series A underwriting, and the evolving dynamics between solo capitalists and traditional multi-stage partnerships. Levine emphasizes the importance of investor humility, founder-centric support, and long-term thesis building in software.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 28.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Harry as informed peer 3.4 Guest teaching 2.9 Guest disagreement 1.0 Harry pushing back 2.3
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 15:00 Rejecting conventional VC ARR metrics
Daniel forcefully dismisses the common $1M ARR benchmark for Series A investing, calling it one of the worst criteria he has ever heard in his life.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 25:27 Harry challenges the firm partnership modelHarry explicitly rejects Daniel's view that firm branding outweighs personal branding, arguing that the personalization of VCs is what created solo capitalists.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 32:50 Refuting multi-stage seed signaling risk with cohort dataDaniel counters host assumptions about negative signaling risk by citing Accel's internal 3-year data showing 18 out of 25 mature seed investments successfully raised follow-on Series A rounds.
Harry holds his own ▶ 34:24 Highlighting structural conflict in multi-stage seed dealsHarry demonstrates sharp industry understanding by pointing out that taking seed money from multi-stage funds prevents founders from being fully transparent because they must continuously sell the fund for the Series A.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Levine's Journey to Venture and Accel | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Harry opens with a warm, friendly introduction citing Daniel's wife and asking about his career trajectory. Daniel provides a self-deprecating monologue about his time at YC, Chartio, Dropbox, and returning to Accel as a self-described 'terrible associate'. | |
| Lessons from Dropbox and Personal Insecurities as an Investor | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Harry cites Accel colleague John Locke to query Daniel on lessons learned at Dropbox versus business school. Daniel shares lessons in professional humility, prompting Harry to admit his own financial modeling insecurities before Daniel discusses founder friends shielding early projects from him. | |
| Evaluating Seed and Series A: People vs. Market vs. Product | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Harry asks Daniel how he prioritizes market, people, and product given current market velocity. Daniel breaks down his framework and strongly rejects relying on arbitrary metrics like reaching $1M ARR for Series A investments. | |
| Navigating Market Timing and Software Investment Theses | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | Harry challenges thesis-driven investing, noting it creates confirmation bias and blinds investors to unexpected moonshots. Daniel agrees on market timing risks, citing investor hubris while outlining his broad conviction in core software over traditional sales engines. | |
| VC Twitter, Personal Branding, and Solo Capitalists vs. Partnerships | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | Harry explicitly disagrees with Daniel's preference for institutional firm branding over personal branding, arguing that partner personalization is driving the rise of solo capitalists. Daniel respectfully defends the partnership model while acknowledging potential ego traps. | |
| Multi-Stage Funds in Seed and Ownership Strategies | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | Harry presses Daniel on multi-stage funds entering seed rounds, challenging him on pricing inflation, negative signaling risks, and founder friction. Daniel uses Accel's historical seed track record and 3-year internal cohort data to refute signaling concerns and explain ownership target strategies. | |
| Quick Fire Round with Daniel Levine | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Harry conducts a fast-paced quick fire round covering biographies, remote work, venture mechanics, and recent investments. Harry notes he would slow down round velocity, while Daniel calls for greater empathy and compassion in the VC community. |
Statements from this episode (16)
Levine: Y Combinator provided $17,000 in summer batch funding for Chartio
“Back then, YC gave us 17,000 dollars for the summer, and I had no savings, so I was broke.”
Levine: Y Combinator founders' skepticism toward VCs is often merited
“I think the default posture of YC companies and founders is a little bit of fun, fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the venture community, which I think is merited in some cases”
Levine: Venture capitalists are not the difference makers in startup success
“I'm trying to do my marginal best, and the company's doing extremely well, and I like to think I'm helping somewhat, but I'm not the be-all, end-all. I'm not the difference maker.”
Levine: Liquid, Fast-Moving VC Markets Favor Established Market Leaders
“A very liquid market where things move quick tends to bias towards market leaders over periods of time”
Levine refuses to invest in unlikable founders despite potential financial returns
“There's a lot of ways to make money backing people you might not particularly like, and I effectively will forego those.”
Levine has never invested right around the $1M ARR threshold
“As far as I know, I have not once done a deal right before, right after hitting a million dollars of ARR.”
Levine: Investors make the most money in a market's second or third inning
“And so a lot of markets, when people think, oh, that's new, it's interesting, that's actually not when you make the most money as an investor. You often make the most money in the second or third inning or later of a market, because all of a sudden the market …”
Stebbings admits he has not returned a single dollar to his LPs
“Like, I haven't returned a dollar to my LPs.”
Levine: Individual personal branding within a VC partnership hurts firm cohesion
“I'm very nervous anytime somebody tries to develop an individual brand at a venture firm, because I really believe that it's a team sport. I really, really, really fundamentally believe that you need a group and a partnership, and it makes everyone stronger.”
Levine: Solo Capitalists Will Persist as a Long-Term VC Model
“I think the sole capitalists are here, and I think many of them will continue to be a thing for a long period of time, and it might become a new mode in our industry, a bimodal or trimodal situation”
Levine: Sequoia's seed deals in Airbnb and Dropbox are history's best
“Two of the best deals of all time were seeds by Sequoia. I think an initial almost 600,000 dollar investment in Airbnb and a million dollar investment in Dropbox to get very large ownership positions.”
Levine: Accel's Slack, Sentry, and Cloudera investments originated as seed deals
“Even at Excel, our first investment in Slack was a seed. Our investment in Sentry started as a seed. Our investment in Cloudera was an EIR.”
Levine: Accel typically buys over 10% ownership in seed rounds
“So typically in our seeds, we're buying over 10% of a business.”
Levine: Accel bought 20% of Sentry at $6M, 25% of Scale
“The first investment I led in Century was at a six million dollar post money, and we purchased about 20% of the business. That was five years ago. Scale, the first deal was at a fifteen million dollar post money, and we bought 25% of the business.”
Levine: 18 of 25 mature Accel seed deals successfully raised Series A
“So every deal we'd done at the seed stage in three years, we'd done about 40 deals, and we termed 25 of them at maturity. So 15 of them were still too new at the time we did this analysis. So they were like, you know, six months in, so they weren't looking to …”
Levine: Founders should deeply interview prospective board members
“Really interview the person you're working with. These people are going to be with you forever. You should really want to get to know them, and it doesn't mean you get to know them by telling them about your business. Ask them about theirs. Ask them about thei…”