May 14, 2018 · 23m · 20vc
20VC: Why Crypto Is The Biggest Disruptor To Hit VC In A Decade, The State of Crypto Today & Why Investing In Decentralized Platforms Requires A New Mental Model with Boris Wertz, Founding Partner @ Version One Ventures
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Boris Wertz, Founding Partner at Version One Ventures, to explore how cryptocurrency and decentralized platforms are disrupting traditional venture capital. Wertz shares key insights on evaluating crypto market cycles, analyzing white papers versus team execution, and adapting investment frameworks for token-based economies.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 35.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Boris explicitly rejects both extremes of the industry narrative—crypto maximalists who believe decentralized platforms will take over everything and deniers who see no change—arguing that true value lies in a hybrid model.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 11:47 Challenging Investor Engagement in ICOsHarry directly challenges Boris's assertion that traditional investor support won't go away in crypto, questioning whether the influx of ICO participants inherently dilutes active investor engagement.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 4:32 Contextualizing Crypto Market Cap vs 1999 Tech BubbleBoris educates Harry by separating technological maturity from financial market maturity, contrasting 1995 Netscape-era tech readiness with a $500B market cap relative to the $4T dot-com peak.
Harry holds his own ▶ 9:48 Citing Industry Perspectives on White Paper LiteracyHarry showcases his industry knowledge by citing Polychain founder Olaf Carlson-Wee's requirement that investors must read white papers, using it to press Boris on his evaluation standard.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boris Wertz's Background and Venture Capital Journey | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Harry sets up the discussion by comparing current crypto hype to the 1999 internet bubble and asking whether uneducated capital could harm the ecosystem long term. Boris provides historical perspective, comparing crypto's technical state to Netscape in 1995 while noting its financial market cap is already at $500B compared to the $4T tech bubble peak. | |
| How Decentralized Platforms Reshape Venture Capital | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Harry prompts Boris to explain why decentralized platforms represent the largest disruption to VC in a decade. Boris outlines three structural shifts: protocol-level value accrual, global open competition via ICOs, and operational challenges like key management and LP agreement restrictions. | |
| Navigating the Crypto Learning Curve and Evaluating White Papers | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Harry demonstrates domain knowledge by citing Polychain's Olaf Carlson-Wee on white paper literacy and pushes back on whether widespread ICO participation diminishes investor value-add. Boris clarifies that top founders are returning to private rounds prior to ICOs to gain focused investor support. | |
| Telegram ICO and Native Crypto vs. Retrofitted Platforms | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Harry presses Boris on the Telegram ICO and asks him to take a stance on whether retrofitting existing platforms or building native crypto projects ground-up is superior. Boris takes a nuanced stance favoring native crypto projects while acknowledging Telegram's product execution strength. | |
| Quick-Fire Round with Boris Wertz | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | In a brisk quick-fire round, Harry asks about books, investment dry spells, and Silicon Valley culture. Boris shares a contrarian take rejecting both crypto purists and deniers, arguing the winning model combines centralization efficiency with decentralization trust. |