Sep 11, 2017 · 29m · 20vc
20VC: USV's Andy Weissman on The Future of The VC Industry, Why USV Does Not Vote On Investment Decisions & Why VCs Should Be Invisible
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Andy Weissman, partner at Union Square Ventures, about USV's consensus-driven investment approach, fund management mechanics, and the future of early-stage venture capital. Weissman details why disciplined process outweighs market foresight, how emerging models like ICOs and algorithmic investing impact venture capital, and why investors should prioritize founder visibility over self-promotion.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 30.2% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Andy rejects the self-promotional culture of modern venture capital, arguing that VCs are merely service providers who should remain opaque and invisible behind their founders.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 23:34 Harry Disagrees on VC Brand ValueHarry explicitly refuses Andy's premise that VCs should be invisible, insisting that strong fund brands provide vital commercial validation for enterprise startups, ending with 'I fundamentally disagree'.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 9:31 Reframing Valuation Dogma with Fund MathAndy counters Harry's quote from Peter Fenton about valuation traps by educating him on fund portfolio mathematics and explaining how disciplined process overrides individual deal FOMO.
Harry holds his own ▶ 21:09 Historical Counterexamples to Quantitative VCHarry uses his deep historical knowledge of early-stage software investments to refute quantitative investing, citing pivot histories like Instagram/Burbn that algorithms would have rejected.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welcome and Opening Pleasantries | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Harry introduces Andy with enthusiasm, while Andy playfully deflates VC myth-making by explaining how he stumbled into the industry after USV rejected his startup. Andy turns the interview dynamic back onto Harry by asking about his experience interviewing thousands of VCs. | |
| Evolving Process and Collaborative Decision-Making | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Andy quotes John Kenneth Galbraith to explain his comfort with uncertainty and why USV prioritizes firm-wide consensus over individualist deal-making. Harry prompts Andy on how firm process differs from individual partner methodology. | |
| Learning from Lost Deals and Price Sensitivity | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | Harry cites a direct quote from Peter Fenton warning against valuation traps to challenge Andy on losing a deal over price. Andy responds with fund portfolio math, clarifying that discipline and process matter more than trying to win every individual deal. | |
| Single-Office Constraints and Reserve Allocation Strategy | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Harry displays strong technical understanding of fund mechanics by bringing up two-stage conviction building and target recycling percentages like 120%. Andy enthusiastically breaks down USV reserve strategies and Monte Carlo simulation modeling. | |
| The Future of VC, ICOs, and Alternative Capital Models | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | Andy reframes traditional early-stage software VC as a hyper-specific allocation craft that may not apply to ICOs, hard sciences, or consumer goods. Harry asks Andy to elaborate on why industry insiders should remain skeptical of crypto disruption. | |
| Archetypes of Value-Add VCs and Quantitative Models | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 | When asked about ideal VC archetypes, Harry asserts his own strength in capital raising and highlights operator value using Jeff Jordan as an example. When Andy posits quantitative early-stage models, Harry directly counters that purely algorithmic models would have failed to fund non-obvious successes like Twitter or Instagram. | |
| Why VCs Should Be Invisible and Public Investment Memos | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 | Andy presents a contrarian stance that VCs should be invisible, opaque, and secondary to founders. Harry strongly pushes back, arguing that prominent VC branding provides essential social proof and enterprise buyer credibility for portfolio companies. | |
| Quickfire Round: Books, Mentors, and Unconventional Beliefs | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | In a quickfire round, Andy gives idiosyncratic answers regarding Jack Kerouac novels and quality footwear, while playfully refusing to name his mentors. Harry attempts to press him to reveal names before moving along smoothly. |