Dec 11, 2023 · 1h 19m · news
Sam Corcos: Why Founders Should Take as Many VC Meetings as Possible | E1093 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of 20VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Levels co-founder and CEO Sam Corcos, exploring his highly systematic, data-driven approaches to startup fundraising, radical company transparency, co-founder dynamics, and extreme personal optimization.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 27.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sam forcefully counters Harry's pitch advice by stating that investor availability is infinite and time is finite, concluding he can either read his pre-sent memo out loud or the investor can just read it themselves.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 43:06 Harry refuses Sam's advice to send pre-meeting materials to VCsHarry directly rejects Sam's recommendation to send dense materials before investor meetings, arguing VCs look for reasons to say no and advocating for face-to-face salesmanship instead.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 1:08:32 Sam's systematic 10-minute date dismissal processSam stuns Harry by explaining how he applies a one-page requirement document and a six-month engagement target to dating, resulting in multiple dates ending respectfully within ten minutes.
Harry holds his own ▶ 37:24 Harry details gamified investor tracking and competition mechanicsHarry demonstrates deep investor relations expertise by outlining a Google Sheet pipeline mechanism with hyperlinked LinkedIn profiles and explicit investor tagging to trigger social competition among angels.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childhood Ambitions and Parental Expectations | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Harry introduces Sam and asks about childhood ambitions, Jewish parental expectations, and a story about bumping into Vinay in New York. The conversation is relaxed, lighthearted, and purely conversational. | |
| The Psychology of Planning versus Spontaneous Travel | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Harry pushes back on Sam's anti-planning mindset by pointing out that Sam is an optimizer who would miss curated experiences without planning. Sam reframes optimization around spontaneous discoveries. | |
| Perceived Risks vs. Statistical Realities of Spontaneity | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | Sam educates Harry on statistical risk versus perceived risk, citing child kidnapping and hitchhiking data to argue news media distorts risk perception. Harry probes how founder risk tolerance changes with company scale. | |
| Defining Luck: Preparation, Opportunity, and Dedication | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Harry cites Sahil Bloom's framework on four types of luck, while Sam explains the Dunning-Kruger curve to illustrate how his confidence in technical opinions evolved over time. | |
| The Crucial Co-Founder Dynamic of Disagree and Commit | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | Harry explicitly disagrees with applying 'disagree and commit' to co-founders, arguing strategic disagreements make full commitment impossible. Sam counters that if a co-founder cannot commit, they must leave. | |
| The Role of Morale and Forward Progress in Talent Retention | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | Harry challenges Sam's radical transparency model, asserting that transparent 1-on-1s eliminate psychological safety. Sam explains how sharing 1-on-1s and performance reviews works in practice. | |
| Real-World Execution of the Keeper Test under Transparency | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Sam describes a real-world case study where executing the Netflix Keeper test transparently during a 1-on-1 resulted in peer support rather than corporate politicking. | |
| Scaling the Talent Bar and the Fragility of Team Trust | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | Harry challenges Sam's assumption that high talent bars can be maintained at massive scale, arguing A-players are inherently rare. Sam acknowledges the U-shaped talent curve at scale. | |
| The Merits of Financial and Fundraising Transparency | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | Harry expresses skepticism about fundraising transparency, noting it creates severe anxiety for employees. Sam responds that financial opacity causes catastrophic distrust when companies fail suddenly. | |
| Deliberate Fundraising and Levels' Product Retention Challenges | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Harry zeroes in on product churn, asking if admitting Levels' 25% retention rate scares growth VCs. Sam casually confirms the low retention figure and details their plan to reach 40%. | |
| Using Loss Aversion and Disincentives for Accountability | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | Harry pitches using loss aversion and financial penalties to drive user retention. Sam reveals Levels has already run 15 cohorts testing that exact wearable challenge disincentive model. | |
| Why Founders Should Pitch as Much as Possible | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | Harry forcefully criticizes founders who do not know competitors as 'poor quality founders'. Sam corrects him, framing them as inexperienced rather than poor quality due to VCs seeing far more deal flow. | |
| Proactive Engagement: How to Extract Value from Investors | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Harry probes how founders can extract value from hundreds of investors. Sam outlines clear rules for specific, highly actionable investor requests instead of vague asks. | |
| The Art of the Specific Ask: Leveraging Cognitive Biases | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 | Harry demonstrates investor relations expertise by describing a gamified Google Sheet tactic with hyperlinked profiles to trigger competitive behavior among investors. Sam details chunking bias and conversion rates. | |
| Evaluating the Real Value and Operating Support of VC Firms | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | Harry brings up Vinod Khosla's view that 90% of VCs detract value and questions why VC platform teams are disrespected. Sam defends a16z's operating partners and Trust Ventures' regulatory support. | |
| Strategies for Pre-Meeting Material and Managing Investor Pitch Dynamics | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | Harry directly rejects Sam's practice of sending pre-meeting materials, arguing investors just look for reasons to pass. Sam reframes filtering out uninterested VCs early as an intentional time-saving feature. | |
| The Role of Associates and Principals in Venture Capital | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Harry breaks down VC organizational structure into two associate archetypes (research analysts vs outbound prospectors). Sam shares negative experiences where partners had no recollection of principal pre-work. | |
| The Theatrics of Fundraising and the Legendary Moshe Lifshitz Pitch | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Sam describes pitching Moshe Lifshitz with a live glucose spike demo after drinking green juice, emphasizing the role of pitch theatrics in selling a big vision. | |
| Investor Diligence, Managing Heavyweight Board Members, and Feedback Cultures | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Harry questions whether taking on iconic board members like Jeff Jordan causes founders to succumb easily. Sam responds that experienced founders realize 'nobody knows anything' and treat VC opinions as guesses. | |
| The Philosophy and Practice of Time Optimization and High Performance | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Sam details his productivity engine, including calendar audits, Chrome website blockers, treating calendars as primary to-do lists, and leaving open buffer space. | |
| Intentionality in Family Planning, Parenting, and Partner Relationships | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | Harry presses Sam on whether his rigid time-optimization will survive a newborn child and challenges Sam's definition of intentionality versus true spontaneity. | |
| A Systematic, Data-Driven Approach to Intentional Dating | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | Sam explains his data-driven dating framework, complete with a one-page requirements doc and a 6-month engagement deadline, noting several dates ended within 10 minutes when requirements were missed. | |
| Co-Founder Diligence, Equity Splits, and Vulnerable Conflict Resolution | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | Harry explicitly disagrees with Sam's advice to address co-founder issues immediately, arguing fatigue or stress requires picking your moment. Sam clarifies that immediate means hours or days rather than months. | |
| Quick-Fire Questions: From Product Over-Staffing to Global Concerns | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | In the quick-fire round, Sam admits eating sugar, shares that over-staffing the product org was his worst resource decision, and cites the collapse of the epistemic commons as his biggest global concern. |