Dec 11, 2023 · 1h 19m · news

Sam Corcos: Why Founders Should Take as Many VC Meetings as Possible | E1093 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings

Sam Corcos · 51m spoken Harry Stebbings · 19m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of 20VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Levels co-founder and CEO Sam Corcos, exploring his highly systematic, data-driven approaches to startup fundraising, radical company transparency, co-founder dynamics, and extreme personal optimization.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 27.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 3.7 Guest teaching 4.0 Guest disagreement 2.0 Harry pushing back 3.7
05100:0020:0040:001:00:000:47–3:24 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Childhood Ambitions and Parental Expectations Harry introduces Sam and asks about childhood ambitions, Jewish parental expectations, and a story about bumping into Vinay in New York. The conversation is relaxed, lighthearted, and purely conversational.3:24–5:30 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 The Psychology of Planning versus Spontaneous Travel Harry pushes back on Sam's anti-planning mindset by pointing out that Sam is an optimizer who would miss curated experiences without planning. Sam reframes optimization around spontaneous discoveries.5:30–8:10 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Perceived Risks vs. Statistical Realities of Spontaneity Sam educates Harry on statistical risk versus perceived risk, citing child kidnapping and hitchhiking data to argue news media distorts risk perception. Harry probes how founder risk tolerance changes with company scale.8:10–10:43 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Defining Luck: Preparation, Opportunity, and Dedication Harry cites Sahil Bloom's framework on four types of luck, while Sam explains the Dunning-Kruger curve to illustrate how his confidence in technical opinions evolved over time.10:43–13:54 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 The Crucial Co-Founder Dynamic of Disagree and Commit Harry explicitly disagrees with applying 'disagree and commit' to co-founders, arguing strategic disagreements make full commitment impossible. Sam counters that if a co-founder cannot commit, they must leave.13:54–18:13 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 The Role of Morale and Forward Progress in Talent Retention Harry challenges Sam's radical transparency model, asserting that transparent 1-on-1s eliminate psychological safety. Sam explains how sharing 1-on-1s and performance reviews works in practice.18:13–20:19 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Real-World Execution of the Keeper Test under Transparency Sam describes a real-world case study where executing the Netflix Keeper test transparently during a 1-on-1 resulted in peer support rather than corporate politicking.20:19–23:41 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Scaling the Talent Bar and the Fragility of Team Trust Harry challenges Sam's assumption that high talent bars can be maintained at massive scale, arguing A-players are inherently rare. Sam acknowledges the U-shaped talent curve at scale.23:41–25:55 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 The Merits of Financial and Fundraising Transparency Harry expresses skepticism about fundraising transparency, noting it creates severe anxiety for employees. Sam responds that financial opacity causes catastrophic distrust when companies fail suddenly.25:55–28:01 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Deliberate Fundraising and Levels' Product Retention Challenges Harry zeroes in on product churn, asking if admitting Levels' 25% retention rate scares growth VCs. Sam casually confirms the low retention figure and details their plan to reach 40%.28:01–30:38 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Using Loss Aversion and Disincentives for Accountability Harry pitches using loss aversion and financial penalties to drive user retention. Sam reveals Levels has already run 15 cohorts testing that exact wearable challenge disincentive model.30:38–33:11 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Why Founders Should Pitch as Much as Possible Harry forcefully criticizes founders who do not know competitors as 'poor quality founders'. Sam corrects him, framing them as inexperienced rather than poor quality due to VCs seeing far more deal flow.33:11–35:18 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Proactive Engagement: How to Extract Value from Investors Harry probes how founders can extract value from hundreds of investors. Sam outlines clear rules for specific, highly actionable investor requests instead of vague asks.35:18–39:05 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Art of the Specific Ask: Leveraging Cognitive Biases Harry demonstrates investor relations expertise by describing a gamified Google Sheet tactic with hyperlinked profiles to trigger competitive behavior among investors. Sam details chunking bias and conversion rates.39:05–41:31 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Evaluating the Real Value and Operating Support of VC Firms Harry brings up Vinod Khosla's view that 90% of VCs detract value and questions why VC platform teams are disrespected. Sam defends a16z's operating partners and Trust Ventures' regulatory support.41:31–44:20 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Strategies for Pre-Meeting Material and Managing Investor Pitch Dynamics Harry directly rejects Sam's practice of sending pre-meeting materials, arguing investors just look for reasons to pass. Sam reframes filtering out uninterested VCs early as an intentional time-saving feature.44:20–48:21 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Role of Associates and Principals in Venture Capital Harry breaks down VC organizational structure into two associate archetypes (research analysts vs outbound prospectors). Sam shares negative experiences where partners had no recollection of principal pre-work.48:21–50:44 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 The Theatrics of Fundraising and the Legendary Moshe Lifshitz Pitch Sam describes pitching Moshe Lifshitz with a live glucose spike demo after drinking green juice, emphasizing the role of pitch theatrics in selling a big vision.50:44–54:48 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Investor Diligence, Managing Heavyweight Board Members, and Feedback Cultures Harry questions whether taking on iconic board members like Jeff Jordan causes founders to succumb easily. Sam responds that experienced founders realize 'nobody knows anything' and treat VC opinions as guesses.54:48–1:00:25 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 The Philosophy and Practice of Time Optimization and High Performance Sam details his productivity engine, including calendar audits, Chrome website blockers, treating calendars as primary to-do lists, and leaving open buffer space.1:00:25–1:05:16 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Intentionality in Family Planning, Parenting, and Partner Relationships Harry presses Sam on whether his rigid time-optimization will survive a newborn child and challenges Sam's definition of intentionality versus true spontaneity.1:05:16–1:09:31 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 A Systematic, Data-Driven Approach to Intentional Dating Sam explains his data-driven dating framework, complete with a one-page requirements doc and a 6-month engagement deadline, noting several dates ended within 10 minutes when requirements were missed.1:09:31–1:14:23 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Co-Founder Diligence, Equity Splits, and Vulnerable Conflict Resolution Harry explicitly disagrees with Sam's advice to address co-founder issues immediately, arguing fatigue or stress requires picking your moment. Sam clarifies that immediate means hours or days rather than months.1:14:23–1:19:52 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Quick-Fire Questions: From Product Over-Staffing to Global Concerns In the quick-fire round, Sam admits eating sugar, shares that over-staffing the product org was his worst resource decision, and cites the collapse of the epistemic commons as his biggest global concern.0:47–3:24 · Guest teaching 1/10 Childhood Ambitions and Parental Expectations Harry introduces Sam and asks about childhood ambitions, Jewish parental expectations, and a story about bumping into Vinay in New York. The conversation is relaxed, lighthearted, and purely conversational.3:24–5:30 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Psychology of Planning versus Spontaneous Travel Harry pushes back on Sam's anti-planning mindset by pointing out that Sam is an optimizer who would miss curated experiences without planning. Sam reframes optimization around spontaneous discoveries.5:30–8:10 · Guest teaching 5/10 Perceived Risks vs. Statistical Realities of Spontaneity Sam educates Harry on statistical risk versus perceived risk, citing child kidnapping and hitchhiking data to argue news media distorts risk perception. Harry probes how founder risk tolerance changes with company scale.8:10–10:43 · Guest teaching 4/10 Defining Luck: Preparation, Opportunity, and Dedication Harry cites Sahil Bloom's framework on four types of luck, while Sam explains the Dunning-Kruger curve to illustrate how his confidence in technical opinions evolved over time.10:43–13:54 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Crucial Co-Founder Dynamic of Disagree and Commit Harry explicitly disagrees with applying 'disagree and commit' to co-founders, arguing strategic disagreements make full commitment impossible. Sam counters that if a co-founder cannot commit, they must leave.13:54–18:13 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Role of Morale and Forward Progress in Talent Retention Harry challenges Sam's radical transparency model, asserting that transparent 1-on-1s eliminate psychological safety. Sam explains how sharing 1-on-1s and performance reviews works in practice.18:13–20:19 · Guest teaching 5/10 Real-World Execution of the Keeper Test under Transparency Sam describes a real-world case study where executing the Netflix Keeper test transparently during a 1-on-1 resulted in peer support rather than corporate politicking.20:19–23:41 · Guest teaching 4/10 Scaling the Talent Bar and the Fragility of Team Trust Harry challenges Sam's assumption that high talent bars can be maintained at massive scale, arguing A-players are inherently rare. Sam acknowledges the U-shaped talent curve at scale.23:41–25:55 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Merits of Financial and Fundraising Transparency Harry expresses skepticism about fundraising transparency, noting it creates severe anxiety for employees. Sam responds that financial opacity causes catastrophic distrust when companies fail suddenly.25:55–28:01 · Guest teaching 4/10 Deliberate Fundraising and Levels' Product Retention Challenges Harry zeroes in on product churn, asking if admitting Levels' 25% retention rate scares growth VCs. Sam casually confirms the low retention figure and details their plan to reach 40%.28:01–30:38 · Guest teaching 3/10 Using Loss Aversion and Disincentives for Accountability Harry pitches using loss aversion and financial penalties to drive user retention. Sam reveals Levels has already run 15 cohorts testing that exact wearable challenge disincentive model.30:38–33:11 · Guest teaching 4/10 Why Founders Should Pitch as Much as Possible Harry forcefully criticizes founders who do not know competitors as 'poor quality founders'. Sam corrects him, framing them as inexperienced rather than poor quality due to VCs seeing far more deal flow.33:11–35:18 · Guest teaching 4/10 Proactive Engagement: How to Extract Value from Investors Harry probes how founders can extract value from hundreds of investors. Sam outlines clear rules for specific, highly actionable investor requests instead of vague asks.35:18–39:05 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Art of the Specific Ask: Leveraging Cognitive Biases Harry demonstrates investor relations expertise by describing a gamified Google Sheet tactic with hyperlinked profiles to trigger competitive behavior among investors. Sam details chunking bias and conversion rates.39:05–41:31 · Guest teaching 5/10 Evaluating the Real Value and Operating Support of VC Firms Harry brings up Vinod Khosla's view that 90% of VCs detract value and questions why VC platform teams are disrespected. Sam defends a16z's operating partners and Trust Ventures' regulatory support.41:31–44:20 · Guest teaching 5/10 Strategies for Pre-Meeting Material and Managing Investor Pitch Dynamics Harry directly rejects Sam's practice of sending pre-meeting materials, arguing investors just look for reasons to pass. Sam reframes filtering out uninterested VCs early as an intentional time-saving feature.44:20–48:21 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Role of Associates and Principals in Venture Capital Harry breaks down VC organizational structure into two associate archetypes (research analysts vs outbound prospectors). Sam shares negative experiences where partners had no recollection of principal pre-work.48:21–50:44 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Theatrics of Fundraising and the Legendary Moshe Lifshitz Pitch Sam describes pitching Moshe Lifshitz with a live glucose spike demo after drinking green juice, emphasizing the role of pitch theatrics in selling a big vision.50:44–54:48 · Guest teaching 4/10 Investor Diligence, Managing Heavyweight Board Members, and Feedback Cultures Harry questions whether taking on iconic board members like Jeff Jordan causes founders to succumb easily. Sam responds that experienced founders realize 'nobody knows anything' and treat VC opinions as guesses.54:48–1:00:25 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Philosophy and Practice of Time Optimization and High Performance Sam details his productivity engine, including calendar audits, Chrome website blockers, treating calendars as primary to-do lists, and leaving open buffer space.1:00:25–1:05:16 · Guest teaching 4/10 Intentionality in Family Planning, Parenting, and Partner Relationships Harry presses Sam on whether his rigid time-optimization will survive a newborn child and challenges Sam's definition of intentionality versus true spontaneity.1:05:16–1:09:31 · Guest teaching 6/10 A Systematic, Data-Driven Approach to Intentional Dating Sam explains his data-driven dating framework, complete with a one-page requirements doc and a 6-month engagement deadline, noting several dates ended within 10 minutes when requirements were missed.1:09:31–1:14:23 · Guest teaching 4/10 Co-Founder Diligence, Equity Splits, and Vulnerable Conflict Resolution Harry explicitly disagrees with Sam's advice to address co-founder issues immediately, arguing fatigue or stress requires picking your moment. Sam clarifies that immediate means hours or days rather than months.1:14:23–1:19:52 · Guest teaching 4/10 Quick-Fire Questions: From Product Over-Staffing to Global Concerns In the quick-fire round, Sam admits eating sugar, shares that over-staffing the product org was his worst resource decision, and cites the collapse of the epistemic commons as his biggest global concern.0:47–3:24 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Childhood Ambitions and Parental Expectations Harry introduces Sam and asks about childhood ambitions, Jewish parental expectations, and a story about bumping into Vinay in New York. The conversation is relaxed, lighthearted, and purely conversational.3:24–5:30 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Psychology of Planning versus Spontaneous Travel Harry pushes back on Sam's anti-planning mindset by pointing out that Sam is an optimizer who would miss curated experiences without planning. Sam reframes optimization around spontaneous discoveries.5:30–8:10 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Perceived Risks vs. Statistical Realities of Spontaneity Sam educates Harry on statistical risk versus perceived risk, citing child kidnapping and hitchhiking data to argue news media distorts risk perception. Harry probes how founder risk tolerance changes with company scale.8:10–10:43 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Defining Luck: Preparation, Opportunity, and Dedication Harry cites Sahil Bloom's framework on four types of luck, while Sam explains the Dunning-Kruger curve to illustrate how his confidence in technical opinions evolved over time.10:43–13:54 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Crucial Co-Founder Dynamic of Disagree and Commit Harry explicitly disagrees with applying 'disagree and commit' to co-founders, arguing strategic disagreements make full commitment impossible. Sam counters that if a co-founder cannot commit, they must leave.13:54–18:13 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Role of Morale and Forward Progress in Talent Retention Harry challenges Sam's radical transparency model, asserting that transparent 1-on-1s eliminate psychological safety. Sam explains how sharing 1-on-1s and performance reviews works in practice.18:13–20:19 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Real-World Execution of the Keeper Test under Transparency Sam describes a real-world case study where executing the Netflix Keeper test transparently during a 1-on-1 resulted in peer support rather than corporate politicking.20:19–23:41 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Scaling the Talent Bar and the Fragility of Team Trust Harry challenges Sam's assumption that high talent bars can be maintained at massive scale, arguing A-players are inherently rare. Sam acknowledges the U-shaped talent curve at scale.23:41–25:55 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Merits of Financial and Fundraising Transparency Harry expresses skepticism about fundraising transparency, noting it creates severe anxiety for employees. Sam responds that financial opacity causes catastrophic distrust when companies fail suddenly.25:55–28:01 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Deliberate Fundraising and Levels' Product Retention Challenges Harry zeroes in on product churn, asking if admitting Levels' 25% retention rate scares growth VCs. Sam casually confirms the low retention figure and details their plan to reach 40%.28:01–30:38 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Using Loss Aversion and Disincentives for Accountability Harry pitches using loss aversion and financial penalties to drive user retention. Sam reveals Levels has already run 15 cohorts testing that exact wearable challenge disincentive model.30:38–33:11 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Why Founders Should Pitch as Much as Possible Harry forcefully criticizes founders who do not know competitors as 'poor quality founders'. Sam corrects him, framing them as inexperienced rather than poor quality due to VCs seeing far more deal flow.33:11–35:18 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Proactive Engagement: How to Extract Value from Investors Harry probes how founders can extract value from hundreds of investors. Sam outlines clear rules for specific, highly actionable investor requests instead of vague asks.35:18–39:05 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Art of the Specific Ask: Leveraging Cognitive Biases Harry demonstrates investor relations expertise by describing a gamified Google Sheet tactic with hyperlinked profiles to trigger competitive behavior among investors. Sam details chunking bias and conversion rates.39:05–41:31 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Evaluating the Real Value and Operating Support of VC Firms Harry brings up Vinod Khosla's view that 90% of VCs detract value and questions why VC platform teams are disrespected. Sam defends a16z's operating partners and Trust Ventures' regulatory support.41:31–44:20 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Strategies for Pre-Meeting Material and Managing Investor Pitch Dynamics Harry directly rejects Sam's practice of sending pre-meeting materials, arguing investors just look for reasons to pass. Sam reframes filtering out uninterested VCs early as an intentional time-saving feature.44:20–48:21 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Role of Associates and Principals in Venture Capital Harry breaks down VC organizational structure into two associate archetypes (research analysts vs outbound prospectors). Sam shares negative experiences where partners had no recollection of principal pre-work.48:21–50:44 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Theatrics of Fundraising and the Legendary Moshe Lifshitz Pitch Sam describes pitching Moshe Lifshitz with a live glucose spike demo after drinking green juice, emphasizing the role of pitch theatrics in selling a big vision.50:44–54:48 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Investor Diligence, Managing Heavyweight Board Members, and Feedback Cultures Harry questions whether taking on iconic board members like Jeff Jordan causes founders to succumb easily. Sam responds that experienced founders realize 'nobody knows anything' and treat VC opinions as guesses.54:48–1:00:25 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Philosophy and Practice of Time Optimization and High Performance Sam details his productivity engine, including calendar audits, Chrome website blockers, treating calendars as primary to-do lists, and leaving open buffer space.1:00:25–1:05:16 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Intentionality in Family Planning, Parenting, and Partner Relationships Harry presses Sam on whether his rigid time-optimization will survive a newborn child and challenges Sam's definition of intentionality versus true spontaneity.1:05:16–1:09:31 · Guest disagreement 2/10 A Systematic, Data-Driven Approach to Intentional Dating Sam explains his data-driven dating framework, complete with a one-page requirements doc and a 6-month engagement deadline, noting several dates ended within 10 minutes when requirements were missed.1:09:31–1:14:23 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Co-Founder Diligence, Equity Splits, and Vulnerable Conflict Resolution Harry explicitly disagrees with Sam's advice to address co-founder issues immediately, arguing fatigue or stress requires picking your moment. Sam clarifies that immediate means hours or days rather than months.1:14:23–1:19:52 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Quick-Fire Questions: From Product Over-Staffing to Global Concerns In the quick-fire round, Sam admits eating sugar, shares that over-staffing the product org was his worst resource decision, and cites the collapse of the epistemic commons as his biggest global concern.0:47–3:24 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Childhood Ambitions and Parental Expectations Harry introduces Sam and asks about childhood ambitions, Jewish parental expectations, and a story about bumping into Vinay in New York. The conversation is relaxed, lighthearted, and purely conversational.3:24–5:30 · Harry pushing back 4/10 The Psychology of Planning versus Spontaneous Travel Harry pushes back on Sam's anti-planning mindset by pointing out that Sam is an optimizer who would miss curated experiences without planning. Sam reframes optimization around spontaneous discoveries.5:30–8:10 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Perceived Risks vs. Statistical Realities of Spontaneity Sam educates Harry on statistical risk versus perceived risk, citing child kidnapping and hitchhiking data to argue news media distorts risk perception. Harry probes how founder risk tolerance changes with company scale.8:10–10:43 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Defining Luck: Preparation, Opportunity, and Dedication Harry cites Sahil Bloom's framework on four types of luck, while Sam explains the Dunning-Kruger curve to illustrate how his confidence in technical opinions evolved over time.10:43–13:54 · Harry pushing back 6/10 The Crucial Co-Founder Dynamic of Disagree and Commit Harry explicitly disagrees with applying 'disagree and commit' to co-founders, arguing strategic disagreements make full commitment impossible. Sam counters that if a co-founder cannot commit, they must leave.13:54–18:13 · Harry pushing back 5/10 The Role of Morale and Forward Progress in Talent Retention Harry challenges Sam's radical transparency model, asserting that transparent 1-on-1s eliminate psychological safety. Sam explains how sharing 1-on-1s and performance reviews works in practice.18:13–20:19 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Real-World Execution of the Keeper Test under Transparency Sam describes a real-world case study where executing the Netflix Keeper test transparently during a 1-on-1 resulted in peer support rather than corporate politicking.20:19–23:41 · Harry pushing back 5/10 Scaling the Talent Bar and the Fragility of Team Trust Harry challenges Sam's assumption that high talent bars can be maintained at massive scale, arguing A-players are inherently rare. Sam acknowledges the U-shaped talent curve at scale.23:41–25:55 · Harry pushing back 5/10 The Merits of Financial and Fundraising Transparency Harry expresses skepticism about fundraising transparency, noting it creates severe anxiety for employees. Sam responds that financial opacity causes catastrophic distrust when companies fail suddenly.25:55–28:01 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Deliberate Fundraising and Levels' Product Retention Challenges Harry zeroes in on product churn, asking if admitting Levels' 25% retention rate scares growth VCs. Sam casually confirms the low retention figure and details their plan to reach 40%.28:01–30:38 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Using Loss Aversion and Disincentives for Accountability Harry pitches using loss aversion and financial penalties to drive user retention. Sam reveals Levels has already run 15 cohorts testing that exact wearable challenge disincentive model.30:38–33:11 · Harry pushing back 5/10 Why Founders Should Pitch as Much as Possible Harry forcefully criticizes founders who do not know competitors as 'poor quality founders'. Sam corrects him, framing them as inexperienced rather than poor quality due to VCs seeing far more deal flow.33:11–35:18 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Proactive Engagement: How to Extract Value from Investors Harry probes how founders can extract value from hundreds of investors. Sam outlines clear rules for specific, highly actionable investor requests instead of vague asks.35:18–39:05 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Art of the Specific Ask: Leveraging Cognitive Biases Harry demonstrates investor relations expertise by describing a gamified Google Sheet tactic with hyperlinked profiles to trigger competitive behavior among investors. Sam details chunking bias and conversion rates.39:05–41:31 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Evaluating the Real Value and Operating Support of VC Firms Harry brings up Vinod Khosla's view that 90% of VCs detract value and questions why VC platform teams are disrespected. Sam defends a16z's operating partners and Trust Ventures' regulatory support.41:31–44:20 · Harry pushing back 6/10 Strategies for Pre-Meeting Material and Managing Investor Pitch Dynamics Harry directly rejects Sam's practice of sending pre-meeting materials, arguing investors just look for reasons to pass. Sam reframes filtering out uninterested VCs early as an intentional time-saving feature.44:20–48:21 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Role of Associates and Principals in Venture Capital Harry breaks down VC organizational structure into two associate archetypes (research analysts vs outbound prospectors). Sam shares negative experiences where partners had no recollection of principal pre-work.48:21–50:44 · Harry pushing back 2/10 The Theatrics of Fundraising and the Legendary Moshe Lifshitz Pitch Sam describes pitching Moshe Lifshitz with a live glucose spike demo after drinking green juice, emphasizing the role of pitch theatrics in selling a big vision.50:44–54:48 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Investor Diligence, Managing Heavyweight Board Members, and Feedback Cultures Harry questions whether taking on iconic board members like Jeff Jordan causes founders to succumb easily. Sam responds that experienced founders realize 'nobody knows anything' and treat VC opinions as guesses.54:48–1:00:25 · Harry pushing back 2/10 The Philosophy and Practice of Time Optimization and High Performance Sam details his productivity engine, including calendar audits, Chrome website blockers, treating calendars as primary to-do lists, and leaving open buffer space.1:00:25–1:05:16 · Harry pushing back 5/10 Intentionality in Family Planning, Parenting, and Partner Relationships Harry presses Sam on whether his rigid time-optimization will survive a newborn child and challenges Sam's definition of intentionality versus true spontaneity.1:05:16–1:09:31 · Harry pushing back 3/10 A Systematic, Data-Driven Approach to Intentional Dating Sam explains his data-driven dating framework, complete with a one-page requirements doc and a 6-month engagement deadline, noting several dates ended within 10 minutes when requirements were missed.1:09:31–1:14:23 · Harry pushing back 6/10 Co-Founder Diligence, Equity Splits, and Vulnerable Conflict Resolution Harry explicitly disagrees with Sam's advice to address co-founder issues immediately, arguing fatigue or stress requires picking your moment. Sam clarifies that immediate means hours or days rather than months.1:14:23–1:19:52 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Quick-Fire Questions: From Product Over-Staffing to Global Concerns In the quick-fire round, Sam admits eating sugar, shares that over-staffing the product org was his worst resource decision, and cites the collapse of the epistemic commons as his biggest global concern.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 49.2% · guest 50.8%0:00 · Harry 49.2% · guest 50.8%3:00 · Harry 22.2% · guest 77.8%3:00 · Harry 22.2% · guest 77.8%6:00 · Harry 34.3% · guest 65.7%6:00 · Harry 34.3% · guest 65.7%9:00 · Harry 12% · guest 88%9:00 · Harry 12% · guest 88%12:00 · Harry 33.9% · guest 66.1%12:00 · Harry 33.9% · guest 66.1%15:00 · Harry 22.9% · guest 77.1%15:00 · Harry 22.9% · guest 77.1%18:00 · Harry 23.8% · guest 76.2%18:00 · Harry 23.8% · guest 76.2%21:00 · Harry 23.4% · guest 76.6%21:00 · Harry 23.4% · guest 76.6%24:00 · Harry 37.3% · guest 62.7%24:00 · Harry 37.3% · guest 62.7%27:00 · Harry 36.1% · guest 63.9%27:00 · Harry 36.1% · guest 63.9%30:00 · Harry 25.8% · guest 74.2%30:00 · Harry 25.8% · guest 74.2%33:00 · Harry 26.1% · guest 73.9%33:00 · Harry 26.1% · guest 73.9%36:00 · Harry 22.4% · guest 77.6%36:00 · Harry 22.4% · guest 77.6%39:00 · Harry 15.3% · guest 84.7%39:00 · Harry 15.3% · guest 84.7%42:00 · Harry 20.2% · guest 79.8%42:00 · Harry 20.2% · guest 79.8%45:00 · Harry 29.3% · guest 70.7%45:00 · Harry 29.3% · guest 70.7%48:00 · Harry 29.8% · guest 70.2%48:00 · Harry 29.8% · guest 70.2%51:00 · Harry 27.6% · guest 72.4%51:00 · Harry 27.6% · guest 72.4%54:00 · Harry 40.4% · guest 59.6%54:00 · Harry 40.4% · guest 59.6%57:00 · Harry 25.5% · guest 74.5%57:00 · Harry 25.5% · guest 74.5%1:00:00 · Harry 43% · guest 57%1:00:00 · Harry 43% · guest 57%1:03:00 · Harry 27.2% · guest 72.8%1:03:00 · Harry 27.2% · guest 72.8%1:06:00 · Harry 17.9% · guest 82.1%1:06:00 · Harry 17.9% · guest 82.1%1:09:00 · Harry 21.8% · guest 78.2%1:09:00 · Harry 21.8% · guest 78.2%1:12:00 · Harry 30.7% · guest 69.3%1:12:00 · Harry 30.7% · guest 69.3%1:15:00 · Harry 25.2% · guest 74.8%1:15:00 · Harry 25.2% · guest 74.8%1:18:00 · Harry 34.2% · guest 65.8%1:18:00 · Harry 34.2% · guest 65.8%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 43:06 Sam dismisses investor pitch meetings as inefficient pre-read material repeats

Sam forcefully counters Harry's pitch advice by stating that investor availability is infinite and time is finite, concluding he can either read his pre-sent memo out loud or the investor can just read it themselves.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 43:06 Harry refuses Sam's advice to send pre-meeting materials to VCs

Harry directly rejects Sam's recommendation to send dense materials before investor meetings, arguing VCs look for reasons to say no and advocating for face-to-face salesmanship instead.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 1:08:32 Sam's systematic 10-minute date dismissal process

Sam stuns Harry by explaining how he applies a one-page requirement document and a six-month engagement target to dating, resulting in multiple dates ending respectfully within ten minutes.

Harry holds his own ▶ 37:24 Harry details gamified investor tracking and competition mechanics

Harry demonstrates deep investor relations expertise by outlining a Google Sheet pipeline mechanism with hyperlinked LinkedIn profiles and explicit investor tagging to trigger social competition among angels.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
Childhood Ambitions and Parental Expectations 1111 Harry introduces Sam and asks about childhood ambitions, Jewish parental expectations, and a story about bumping into Vinay in New York. The conversation is relaxed, lighthearted, and purely conversational.
The Psychology of Planning versus Spontaneous Travel 3324 Harry pushes back on Sam's anti-planning mindset by pointing out that Sam is an optimizer who would miss curated experiences without planning. Sam reframes optimization around spontaneous discoveries.
Perceived Risks vs. Statistical Realities of Spontaneity 2523 Sam educates Harry on statistical risk versus perceived risk, citing child kidnapping and hitchhiking data to argue news media distorts risk perception. Harry probes how founder risk tolerance changes with company scale.
Defining Luck: Preparation, Opportunity, and Dedication 3412 Harry cites Sahil Bloom's framework on four types of luck, while Sam explains the Dunning-Kruger curve to illustrate how his confidence in technical opinions evolved over time.
The Crucial Co-Founder Dynamic of Disagree and Commit 4336 Harry explicitly disagrees with applying 'disagree and commit' to co-founders, arguing strategic disagreements make full commitment impossible. Sam counters that if a co-founder cannot commit, they must leave.
The Role of Morale and Forward Progress in Talent Retention 4425 Harry challenges Sam's radical transparency model, asserting that transparent 1-on-1s eliminate psychological safety. Sam explains how sharing 1-on-1s and performance reviews works in practice.
Real-World Execution of the Keeper Test under Transparency 2522 Sam describes a real-world case study where executing the Netflix Keeper test transparently during a 1-on-1 resulted in peer support rather than corporate politicking.
Scaling the Talent Bar and the Fragility of Team Trust 4425 Harry challenges Sam's assumption that high talent bars can be maintained at massive scale, arguing A-players are inherently rare. Sam acknowledges the U-shaped talent curve at scale.
The Merits of Financial and Fundraising Transparency 3425 Harry expresses skepticism about fundraising transparency, noting it creates severe anxiety for employees. Sam responds that financial opacity causes catastrophic distrust when companies fail suddenly.
Deliberate Fundraising and Levels' Product Retention Challenges 5424 Harry zeroes in on product churn, asking if admitting Levels' 25% retention rate scares growth VCs. Sam casually confirms the low retention figure and details their plan to reach 40%.
Using Loss Aversion and Disincentives for Accountability 6323 Harry pitches using loss aversion and financial penalties to drive user retention. Sam reveals Levels has already run 15 cohorts testing that exact wearable challenge disincentive model.
Why Founders Should Pitch as Much as Possible 5435 Harry forcefully criticizes founders who do not know competitors as 'poor quality founders'. Sam corrects him, framing them as inexperienced rather than poor quality due to VCs seeing far more deal flow.
Proactive Engagement: How to Extract Value from Investors 4423 Harry probes how founders can extract value from hundreds of investors. Sam outlines clear rules for specific, highly actionable investor requests instead of vague asks.
The Art of the Specific Ask: Leveraging Cognitive Biases 6413 Harry demonstrates investor relations expertise by describing a gamified Google Sheet tactic with hyperlinked profiles to trigger competitive behavior among investors. Sam details chunking bias and conversion rates.
Evaluating the Real Value and Operating Support of VC Firms 4524 Harry brings up Vinod Khosla's view that 90% of VCs detract value and questions why VC platform teams are disrespected. Sam defends a16z's operating partners and Trust Ventures' regulatory support.
Strategies for Pre-Meeting Material and Managing Investor Pitch Dynamics 5546 Harry directly rejects Sam's practice of sending pre-meeting materials, arguing investors just look for reasons to pass. Sam reframes filtering out uninterested VCs early as an intentional time-saving feature.
The Role of Associates and Principals in Venture Capital 6423 Harry breaks down VC organizational structure into two associate archetypes (research analysts vs outbound prospectors). Sam shares negative experiences where partners had no recollection of principal pre-work.
The Theatrics of Fundraising and the Legendary Moshe Lifshitz Pitch 3412 Sam describes pitching Moshe Lifshitz with a live glucose spike demo after drinking green juice, emphasizing the role of pitch theatrics in selling a big vision.
Investor Diligence, Managing Heavyweight Board Members, and Feedback Cultures 4424 Harry questions whether taking on iconic board members like Jeff Jordan causes founders to succumb easily. Sam responds that experienced founders realize 'nobody knows anything' and treat VC opinions as guesses.
The Philosophy and Practice of Time Optimization and High Performance 2512 Sam details his productivity engine, including calendar audits, Chrome website blockers, treating calendars as primary to-do lists, and leaving open buffer space.
Intentionality in Family Planning, Parenting, and Partner Relationships 4435 Harry presses Sam on whether his rigid time-optimization will survive a newborn child and challenges Sam's definition of intentionality versus true spontaneity.
A Systematic, Data-Driven Approach to Intentional Dating 3623 Sam explains his data-driven dating framework, complete with a one-page requirements doc and a 6-month engagement deadline, noting several dates ended within 10 minutes when requirements were missed.
Co-Founder Diligence, Equity Splits, and Vulnerable Conflict Resolution 4436 Harry explicitly disagrees with Sam's advice to address co-founder issues immediately, arguing fatigue or stress requires picking your moment. Sam clarifies that immediate means hours or days rather than months.
Quick-Fire Questions: From Product Over-Staffing to Global Concerns 2422 In the quick-fire round, Sam admits eating sugar, shares that over-staffing the product org was his worst resource decision, and cites the collapse of the epistemic commons as his biggest global concern.

Statements from this episode (60)

Insight
Corcos: Founders Should Target Believer VCs Rather Than Convert Skeptics
“It's a little bit challenging because when you're fundraising, you're a prophet, not a missionary. You have the vision, and you're trying to get people who already get it. You're not trying to convert people to your religion.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 0:05
Insight
Corcos: Founders Mistakenly Treat Early Investor Contacts as Precious Gems
“I think one of the major mistakes that people make early on is they treat investor contacts like precious gems.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 29:10
Assertion Supported
Corcos: Child stranger abductions are as rare as lightning strikes
“Say if you have a child, the odds that your child is kidnapped by a stranger Is about the same as them getting struck by lightning.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 5:46
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Corcos: Hitchhiking is statistically not dangerous
“Hitchhiking is actually not dangerous.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 5:56
Insight
Corcos: News consumption creates a false perception of global risk
“Ultimately the news is poison and it makes you view a, It gives you a perception of the world that is not real.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 6:11
Insight
Corcos: The Main Downside of Starting a Company Is Mild Embarrassment
“Like starting a company feels risky, but really what's the worst that can happen? Like it doesn't work and you feel like mildly embarrassed. It's actually the downside situation is not the worst thing that can happen.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 7:02
Insight
Corcos: People Become More Afraid of Failure as Their Reputation Grows
“The more reputation you have, The more afraid you are of failure, which is ironic because it should be the opposite, but this is, this seems to be just a default state of human nature.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 7:57
Opinion
Stebbings Prefers Investing in Serial Entrepreneurs Over First-Time Founders
“I really only like to invest in serial entrepreneurs, Sam, because I think you do so many stupid things to The first time around”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 9:02
Insight
Corcos: Co-founders who cannot commit to CEO decisions should leave
“There's a point at which, you know, you can disagree behind closed doors, but once the path is defined, which is defined by the CEO, you've got to get behind it or you've got to leave. Frankly, like if you can't get behind the idea and you can't get behind the…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 11:42
Insight
Corcos: CEOs have a 1% impact on everything and no direct deliverables
“When you're the CEO, you have a one percent impact on everything, but you have Almost nothing that you can actually point to as your own work product.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 13:06
Opinion
Stebbings: Celebrating wins creates complacency while 20VC remains behind competitors
“I find wins quite uncomfortable. I don't want everyone to get complacent. We haven't won shit. We're still behind other people in media and funds.”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 13:44
Insight
Stebbings: Incremental title and salary increases are key to talent retention
“Little and often is my secret to retaining great talent. And what I mean by that is you have title and salary, and I increase them separately, but little and often to create that kind of feeling of forward momentum more frequently.”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 14:26
Assertion Contradicted
Levels eliminated corporate titles beyond basic functional roles
“We've done away with titles beyond just, yeah, beyond just functional definitions.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 14:45
Assertion Partly supported
Levels publicly posts all investor updates and all-hands meetings
“We post all of our investor updates publicly online. All of our team, all hands are publicly posted online.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 15:13
Insight
Corcos: Job Titles Serve as a Form of Non-Monetary Employee Compensation
“Titles are a form of compensation.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 15:28
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Levels shares meeting notes and performance reviews internally with all staff
“We share basically everything, including all of our one-on-ones and team meetings are all shared within the company. So you can see all of the one-on-ones between every other person at the company performance is shared within the pump within the company. So yo…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 15:31
Insight
Corcos: Employees outside an immediate team rarely identify low performers
“They actually very often don't. The people who work directly with them, maybe like the two or three people who are closest to them know, but everyone else at the company, if they end up leaving, it's a complete mystery why they left.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 19:36
Insight
Corcos: Startup talent quality follows a U-curve as companies scale
“I think in many ways there's also a U-shape to this, where in the very early days, sometimes you just hire the best person that you can get. Because you don't have a lot of choices. And then over time, as you see some amount of traction, you can attract really…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 21:03
Disclosure
Corcos: Keeping Performance and Compensation Secret Created Distrust at Levels
“And the two exceptions that we made were compensation and individual performance. So we kept those two secret. So one-on-ones were secret. If somebody was failing, it was secret. And when somebody would depart, they would write their own definition of why they…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 22:19
Opinion
Stebbings: Transparency around fundraising risks severe team morale issues
“Fundraising transparency is a real challenge for me because teams get Caught up in it. Oh, we're going to raise around. And then if it takes longer, if it doesn't happen, it can create real morale challenges.”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 23:51
Insight
Corcos: Fundraising transparency works when founders build internal trust
“If you've built up enough social capital internally, think of it like you've built up the trust bank with enough of enough credibility that people know that you're not lying to them, then it's totally fine. And it's never been an issue.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 24:12
Insight
Corcos: Employees must know company financials so they can contribute
“People should know the financial state of the company. People should understand what's going on because people can contribute to these things.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 25:07
Assertion Supported
Corcos: Levels has 25% retention, which is insufficient long-term
“I mean, churn is still very high. It's like 25%. We have 25% retention, which is not what it needs to be for this to work in the long term.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 26:37
Insight
Corcos: Health tracking retention relies on accountability over learning
“The people who stay the longest They value the accountability of the tool more than they value the discrete learnings of each step.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 27:36
Disclosure
Levels ran around 15 cohorts testing loss disincentives for health goals
“Yeah, we've done something in the range of about 15 different, 15 cohorts with the wearable challenge, which we've been doing with Justin Mares, where you commit some amount of cash upfront, and then every time you miss your goal, you lose some amount of money…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 28:34
Insight
Corcos: Most founders treat fundraising as isolated events, not trend lines
“I think most founders treat each fundraise like a dot rather than a trend line.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 29:53
Disclosure
Corcos: Levels raised capital primarily from multi-year investor relationships
“A lot of the people that we raise money from are people that I've known for three, four, five plus years.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 29:59
Insight
Corcos: Founders Should Take as Many Investor Meetings as Possible
“I think you should take as many meetings and do as many pitches as you can.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 30:53
Opinion
Stebbings: Founders Who Do Not Know Market Competitors Are Poor Quality
“Do you know, I think that's a poor quality founder. I'm like, if you don't know your market, if you were to ask me about fund or media competition, I could tell you everyone break them down by pros and like, that's just a bad founder.”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 31:27
Insight
Corcos: VCs Have Far Greater Market Exposure Than Founders
“The reality is that VCs or investors broadly just have way more exposure than a founder does. If you're a founder and you're working on your one company for five years. You don't know what's going on outside of your company. You don't have the capacity. You're…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 31:38
Disclosure
Levels raised from approximately 100 angels before institutional capital
“Before we had our first institutional capital, I think we had about a hundred angels and operators that were investors that we were able to tap pretty consistently for the first couple of years.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 32:38
Opinion
Stebbings: Very few founders extract real value from angel investors
“I think that it's great to have these names, but very, very few actually extract the value that they want or need from them.”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 33:03
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Corcos: VCs spend only an hour a month thinking about your startup
“They spend maybe An hour a month thinking about your company and you spend all day, every day thinking about your company.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 33:45
Insight
Corcos: Founders fail if they don't maintain explicit lists of investor asks
“The first and most important thing is you need to know what you need. If I say, how can I help? And you say, I don't know, you've already failed. You need to have a list of things that your, you and your team need help with, because you'd be surprised at how o…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 34:35
Disclosure
Levels secures VC support via a dedicated asks section in updates
“In our investor update, we have an asks section. Of things that people on our team need or things that the company needs. And we very regularly get conversions from those from our, just sort of the broad outreach to our investors.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 35:06
Disclosure
Corcos: Levels sent over 3,000 targeted investor asks with 50% conversion
“I think we've had something like more than 3000 specific investor asks that I've sent people. And I think our conversion rate is maybe 50% from that group, but pretty high.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 36:47
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Corcos: Average Founders Only Send Five Requests Per Year to Investors
“From the exposure that I've had to other founders, that they probably send something in the range of Five requests per year.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 37:03
Insight
Stebbings: Transparent Pipeline Sheets Drive Investor Competition and Value
“When it comes to like sales pipeline in particular, share a Google sheet with the companies that you want to speak to, the specific person within the company, hyperlink, hyperlink their LinkedIn. So it's super easy for me to go. Oh shit. Actually, I do know th…”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 37:24
Insight
Corcos: Founders Should Turn Down Capital From Unengaged Investors
“If it is a really an expectation of you that your investors will be engaged and respond to your emails and participate to some degree, you should set that as a clear expectation and say, this is what we expect from our investors. If that's not you, Totally. Ok…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 38:49
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Corcos: Levels Has Extracted Value From Over 110 a16z Operating Partners
“I think our team has extracted value from, I think more than a 110 of the operating partners. From the Andreessen team.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 39:40
Opinion
Corcos: Most VC Platform Services Fail, but a16z Is the Best
“I think part of the answer is that most firms are not good at it. It's sort of the short answer. I think most firms, they understand when they talk to founders, they say that it's the thing that they want, but they're not very good at delivering on the value. …”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 40:08
Assertion Supported
Corcos: Sequoia's Vernal and Andreessen's Jordan Read Every Pre-Meeting Document
“The people who were most engaged was Mike Vernal at Sequoia and Jeff Jordan and Andreessen. They read every document. Jeff actually even fixed some typos like deep in like a 50 page document.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 42:45
Insight
Stebbings: Early-Stage Founders Should Not Send Pitch Decks Before Meetings
“If it's like early, early meetings, Don't send it ahead of time, because generally investors look for reasons to say no.”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 43:09
Insight
Corcos: Pre-Meeting Rejections Are Wins Because Founder Pitch Time Is Finite
“The number of investors available is effectively infinite, and the amount of time that you have to pitch people is finite. And so if you can get them to say no before you have to spend any time with them, that's actually a win, not a loss.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 43:33
Insight
Stebbings: VC associates fall into research or outbound sales roles
“Being in the industry, there's kind of two functions or two types. One is like the research person who is just incredible depth and analysis, post meeting, benchmarking, landscape analysis, you name it. And the other is outbound sales prospecting. We can't mis…”
Harry Stebbings Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 45:11
What-if
Corcos: Founders Should Use Roll-Up Vehicles for Early Startup Fundraising Rounds
“If there's one thing I would have done differently is I would have used a rollup vehicle of some kind to just make the collection easier. Those weren't as common when we did our seed round. It was the round that had the larger number of people in it. Having a …”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 45:48
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Levels found early post-IPO company employees were their highest-ROI investors
“When we did some analysis on who our most ROI positive investors were, one of the biggest categories was early employees at post IPO companies. And these are people who have some amount of capital that they want to deploy, but maybe, you know, five, 10,000 dol…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 47:31
Insight
Corcos: Founders pitching investors with only one deck are doing it wrong
“If you only have one deck with one pitch, you're doing it wrong. You've got to try different avenues of attack. You've got to try different language. You've got to try different pitches to determine which of these work.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 49:33
Insight
Corcos: Theater and performative salesmanship are critical when pitching big visions
“I think if you're trying to pitch a big vision for the future, theater is absolutely critical.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 50:08
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Levels tracks investor engagement and has investors who ignored 17 requests
“We keep track of all of these things on how many emails we send, what the, Conversion rate is on those requests. And like, we have several people on the list that I've sent them 17 requests and they've converted on zero of them.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 51:24
Insight
Corcos: Founders must diligence prospective board members like potential marriage partners
“If you're taking on a board member, you need to do the amount of diligence that you would do if you're considering marrying this person.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 52:40
Opinion
Corcos Prefers Direct, Full-Contact Investors Like Keith Rabois Over Passive Ones
“Keith from founders fund is known for being pretty full contact. And I. Talk to some people who really did not like working with him, but they didn't like working him. They didn't like working with him for reasons that I would actually enjoy working with him, …”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 54:01
Insight
Corcos: Using your calendar as your primary to-do list maximizes productivity
“One of the biggest is using your calendar as your primary to-do list. That's probably the biggest unlock for me in terms of just being realistic about how much I can deliver in the course of a week.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 59:08
Assertion Partly supported
Corcos: Roughly 80% of Couples Report Worse Marriages After Having Kids
“Something in the range of 80% of people say that their marriage is worse after having kids.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 1:02:53
Disclosure
Corcos Manages Relationship Logistics With Wednesday Dates and a Notion Doc
“We do a weekly date night, which we have scheduled on Wednesdays. We do also every Saturday, we have scheduled family priorities where we have a running notion doc of logistics, things that we argued about that we want to talk about, just dedicated time just t…”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 1:03:18
Insight
Corcos: Dating Is a Matching Problem, Not a Sales Problem
“I think the biggest mistakes that people make is they treat Dating like it's a sales problem rather than a matching problem.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 1:05:55
Insight
Corcos: Six Months Provides Enough Data to Judge Romantic Fit
“Usually you have enough data points within about six months to know if it's the right fit.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 1:07:23
Opinion
Corcos: Equal Equity Splits Are Not Required for Co-Founders
“As a rule, I would say, no, it's not required. I think it depends a lot on subject matter expertise. It depends a lot on also how you view the definition of what a co-founder is.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 1:10:56
Insight
Corcos: Prioritizing engineers is better than expanding product management
“Our product org got much too large, and I've learned that having more engineers is better than having more people in product.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 1:17:11
Opinion
Corcos: Product management should play a much smaller role in tech
“Product management, broadly, should play a much less significant role than it does as a default in most software development companies.”
Sam Corcos Dec 11, 2023 ▶ 1:18:14

Shorts cut from this episode

▶ CEO Soulmate Checklist 💘 #shorts · 20VC with Harry Stebbing (@1:05:27) ▶ Fundraising For Your Business? Do This 🤑 #shorts · 20VC wi (@0:06) ▶ Do You Pass This Netflix Test? 🫣 #shorts · 20VC with Harry (@17:23) ▶ Confidence Is An Illusion! ✨ Agree? 👇 #shorts · 20VC with H (@9:41) ▶ $35 Billion VC Fund Operating Secrets Revealed by CEO #short (@0:00)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.