Aug 4, 2025 · 1h 30m · 20vc

Miles Dieffenbach: Inside Carnegie Mellon’s $4BN Endowment & The Math Behind DPI, TVPI, Illiquidity · 20VC with Harry Stebbings

Miles Dieffenbach · 1h 1m spoken Harry Stebbings · 19m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this 20VC episode, host Harry Stebbings interviews Miles Dieffenbach, Managing Director of Investments at Carnegie Mellon University, to dissect the complex mechanics of institutional endowment allocation. Dieffenbach provides a candid critique of the venture capital industry's current liquidity crisis, the broken math of multi-billion dollar growth funds, and the rigorous governance processes CMU employs to ensure disciplined risk management.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 23.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 5.0 Guest teaching 6.0 Guest disagreement 1.6 Harry pushing back 2.4
05100:0020:0040:001:00:001:20:000:38–4:29 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 The Interview Begins and Overcoming Cancer Harry begins with an empathetic conversation regarding Miles surviving lymphoma at age 26. The dynamic is collaborative and personal, with no pushback or conflict.4:29–8:28 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Carnegie Mellon's Endowment and Portfolio Construction Miles breaks down CMU's $4B endowment architecture, detailing the 85/15 equity/fixed income split and 50% private allocation. Harry asks clean structural questions.8:28–11:51 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Venture Return Reality and LP Decile Access Miles bluntly states LPs are not compensated for venture risk, backing his claim with historical IRR and DPI benchmark data. Harry raises a mild counterpoint about lagging historical data.11:51–15:49 · Harry as informed peer 7/10 The Fallacy of Seed Funds and Selection Harry forcefully challenges the math of $50M-$100M seed funds, calculating average round sizes and check requirements. Miles responds by defending non-consensus deal pricing.15:49–20:22 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 The Pillars of Venture and Portfolio Management Miles walks through the five pillars of venture and explains why LPs prefer cash distributions over stock. Harry probes GP markup accuracy and hubris.20:22–27:13 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Proprietary Sourcing, Picking, and GP Diligence Miles discusses deal sourcing and the necessity of conducting 20 reference calls, including off-reference checks. Harry offers relevant industry anecdotes regarding fund humility.27:13–30:20 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Partnership Dynamics and the US Marriage Analogy Miles analyzes why VC partnerships break down due to incentives and work ethic discrepancies, comparing GP commitments to 25-year marriages.30:20–34:04 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 LP Churn, Fund Concentration, and Taxes Miles breaks down the mathematical headwinds for US endowments, explaining how a 5% annual draw plus 3% higher-ed inflation forces an 8% return target.34:04–42:24 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Fundraising Timelines and Management Stake Risks Miles delivers a masterclass on multi-stage fund scaling, proving mathematically that a $7B vehicle requires $800B in exit market cap to return 4x net. Harry counters that macro outcome sizes are expanding.42:24–45:42 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Index Ventures and Fund Size Discipline Miles praises Index Ventures for maintaining fund size discipline post-2021. Harry pushes on whether $1B-$2B funds represent an awkward middle ground.45:42–48:52 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Math of Venture Returns: Figma and Wiz Outcomes Miles illustrates return dilution by showing how owning 10% of a $20B Figma outcome generates only 0.2x net return for a $7B fund. The conversation addresses fee stacking incentives.48:52–52:07 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Active Management Debates and the Persistence of High Fees Harry challenges the idea of active management, arguing LPs prefer passive managers over GPs who push bad operational choices. Miles argues mega growth funds charging 2&20 are essentially passive public equity managers.52:07–54:40 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 LP Decision Making: Performance-Driven Discipline vs. Brand Loyalty Miles criticizes LPs who allocate based on brand names to avoid career risk rather than targeting superior risk-adjusted returns.54:40–57:08 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 The Acceptance of High GP Fees and Market Dynamics Miles examines fund deployment cycles and praises Mark Suster for selling portfolio positions in 2021 to secure real DPI for LPs.57:08–59:53 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Liquidity Drought and SaaS Valuation Realities Miles contextualizes the current liquidity drought, pointing out that 2022-2024 saw fewer public IPO dollars than post-dot-com crash 2002-2004. He contrasts slow SaaS growth with public Microsoft.59:53–1:05:33 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Direct Portfolio Monitoring and Underwriting Extreme Outcomes Miles shares an incredible story about a 13-year-old fund holding Circle at a 30% discount before its valuation exploded. He analyzes the risks of secondary portfolio sales like Yale's.1:05:33–1:08:21 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Liquidity Hurdles and the Vital Call for IPOs Miles urges venture capitalists to take companies public, explaining how private capital was unnaturally cheaper than public capital for years but public markets now reward quality tech.1:08:21–1:11:02 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 CMU's Agnostic Approach to Thematic and Sector-Focused Funds Miles explains CMU's sector-agnostic approach and discusses structural USD/RMB fund misalignment in China caused by US sanctions.1:11:02–1:14:05 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Big Tech M&A: Cash-Rich Buyers and Regulatory Friction Miles breaks down Big Tech's immense cash reserves and explains why regulatory friction forces them into acqui-hires and licensing deals rather than traditional M&A.1:14:05–1:18:27 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 OpenAI's High Burn Rate and the Inevitable AI Bubble Miles presents a strong bear thesis on OpenAI, pointing out its $5B-$10B annual burn rate and stating it could go to zero if an AI bubble pops and capital markets freeze.1:18:27–1:20:35 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 The Cyclical Risks of NVIDIA's Peak Valuation Miles highlights NVIDIA's underlying hardware cyclicality, citing investor Chris Hohn to warn of a potential 70% drawdown during a cyclical demand dip.1:20:35–1:22:47 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Constructive Criticism and the Overranking of 'Founder Friendliness' Miles draws on his college football background to argue that hard coaching beats superficial 'founder friendliness', emphasizing that constructive criticism drives trajectory changes.1:22:47–1:30:19 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Quick-Fire Round: Industry Truths, Red Flags, and GP Behaviors In a rapid-fire session, Miles exposes common GP fundraising lies, discusses GP commit importance, and tells a funny story about playing late-night ping pong with Lee Jacobs to win an allocation.0:38–4:29 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Interview Begins and Overcoming Cancer Harry begins with an empathetic conversation regarding Miles surviving lymphoma at age 26. The dynamic is collaborative and personal, with no pushback or conflict.4:29–8:28 · Guest teaching 5/10 Carnegie Mellon's Endowment and Portfolio Construction Miles breaks down CMU's $4B endowment architecture, detailing the 85/15 equity/fixed income split and 50% private allocation. Harry asks clean structural questions.8:28–11:51 · Guest teaching 6/10 Venture Return Reality and LP Decile Access Miles bluntly states LPs are not compensated for venture risk, backing his claim with historical IRR and DPI benchmark data. Harry raises a mild counterpoint about lagging historical data.11:51–15:49 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Fallacy of Seed Funds and Selection Harry forcefully challenges the math of $50M-$100M seed funds, calculating average round sizes and check requirements. Miles responds by defending non-consensus deal pricing.15:49–20:22 · Guest teaching 6/10 The Pillars of Venture and Portfolio Management Miles walks through the five pillars of venture and explains why LPs prefer cash distributions over stock. Harry probes GP markup accuracy and hubris.20:22–27:13 · Guest teaching 5/10 Proprietary Sourcing, Picking, and GP Diligence Miles discusses deal sourcing and the necessity of conducting 20 reference calls, including off-reference checks. Harry offers relevant industry anecdotes regarding fund humility.27:13–30:20 · Guest teaching 5/10 Partnership Dynamics and the US Marriage Analogy Miles analyzes why VC partnerships break down due to incentives and work ethic discrepancies, comparing GP commitments to 25-year marriages.30:20–34:04 · Guest teaching 6/10 LP Churn, Fund Concentration, and Taxes Miles breaks down the mathematical headwinds for US endowments, explaining how a 5% annual draw plus 3% higher-ed inflation forces an 8% return target.34:04–42:24 · Guest teaching 8/10 Fundraising Timelines and Management Stake Risks Miles delivers a masterclass on multi-stage fund scaling, proving mathematically that a $7B vehicle requires $800B in exit market cap to return 4x net. Harry counters that macro outcome sizes are expanding.42:24–45:42 · Guest teaching 6/10 Index Ventures and Fund Size Discipline Miles praises Index Ventures for maintaining fund size discipline post-2021. Harry pushes on whether $1B-$2B funds represent an awkward middle ground.45:42–48:52 · Guest teaching 7/10 The Math of Venture Returns: Figma and Wiz Outcomes Miles illustrates return dilution by showing how owning 10% of a $20B Figma outcome generates only 0.2x net return for a $7B fund. The conversation addresses fee stacking incentives.48:52–52:07 · Guest teaching 6/10 Active Management Debates and the Persistence of High Fees Harry challenges the idea of active management, arguing LPs prefer passive managers over GPs who push bad operational choices. Miles argues mega growth funds charging 2&20 are essentially passive public equity managers.52:07–54:40 · Guest teaching 5/10 LP Decision Making: Performance-Driven Discipline vs. Brand Loyalty Miles criticizes LPs who allocate based on brand names to avoid career risk rather than targeting superior risk-adjusted returns.54:40–57:08 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Acceptance of High GP Fees and Market Dynamics Miles examines fund deployment cycles and praises Mark Suster for selling portfolio positions in 2021 to secure real DPI for LPs.57:08–59:53 · Guest teaching 7/10 The Liquidity Drought and SaaS Valuation Realities Miles contextualizes the current liquidity drought, pointing out that 2022-2024 saw fewer public IPO dollars than post-dot-com crash 2002-2004. He contrasts slow SaaS growth with public Microsoft.59:53–1:05:33 · Guest teaching 8/10 Direct Portfolio Monitoring and Underwriting Extreme Outcomes Miles shares an incredible story about a 13-year-old fund holding Circle at a 30% discount before its valuation exploded. He analyzes the risks of secondary portfolio sales like Yale's.1:05:33–1:08:21 · Guest teaching 6/10 Liquidity Hurdles and the Vital Call for IPOs Miles urges venture capitalists to take companies public, explaining how private capital was unnaturally cheaper than public capital for years but public markets now reward quality tech.1:08:21–1:11:02 · Guest teaching 6/10 CMU's Agnostic Approach to Thematic and Sector-Focused Funds Miles explains CMU's sector-agnostic approach and discusses structural USD/RMB fund misalignment in China caused by US sanctions.1:11:02–1:14:05 · Guest teaching 7/10 Big Tech M&A: Cash-Rich Buyers and Regulatory Friction Miles breaks down Big Tech's immense cash reserves and explains why regulatory friction forces them into acqui-hires and licensing deals rather than traditional M&A.1:14:05–1:18:27 · Guest teaching 7/10 OpenAI's High Burn Rate and the Inevitable AI Bubble Miles presents a strong bear thesis on OpenAI, pointing out its $5B-$10B annual burn rate and stating it could go to zero if an AI bubble pops and capital markets freeze.1:18:27–1:20:35 · Guest teaching 7/10 The Cyclical Risks of NVIDIA's Peak Valuation Miles highlights NVIDIA's underlying hardware cyclicality, citing investor Chris Hohn to warn of a potential 70% drawdown during a cyclical demand dip.1:20:35–1:22:47 · Guest teaching 6/10 Constructive Criticism and the Overranking of 'Founder Friendliness' Miles draws on his college football background to argue that hard coaching beats superficial 'founder friendliness', emphasizing that constructive criticism drives trajectory changes.1:22:47–1:30:19 · Guest teaching 6/10 Quick-Fire Round: Industry Truths, Red Flags, and GP Behaviors In a rapid-fire session, Miles exposes common GP fundraising lies, discusses GP commit importance, and tells a funny story about playing late-night ping pong with Lee Jacobs to win an allocation.0:38–4:29 · Guest disagreement 0/10 The Interview Begins and Overcoming Cancer Harry begins with an empathetic conversation regarding Miles surviving lymphoma at age 26. The dynamic is collaborative and personal, with no pushback or conflict.4:29–8:28 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Carnegie Mellon's Endowment and Portfolio Construction Miles breaks down CMU's $4B endowment architecture, detailing the 85/15 equity/fixed income split and 50% private allocation. Harry asks clean structural questions.8:28–11:51 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Venture Return Reality and LP Decile Access Miles bluntly states LPs are not compensated for venture risk, backing his claim with historical IRR and DPI benchmark data. Harry raises a mild counterpoint about lagging historical data.11:51–15:49 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Fallacy of Seed Funds and Selection Harry forcefully challenges the math of $50M-$100M seed funds, calculating average round sizes and check requirements. Miles responds by defending non-consensus deal pricing.15:49–20:22 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Pillars of Venture and Portfolio Management Miles walks through the five pillars of venture and explains why LPs prefer cash distributions over stock. Harry probes GP markup accuracy and hubris.20:22–27:13 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Proprietary Sourcing, Picking, and GP Diligence Miles discusses deal sourcing and the necessity of conducting 20 reference calls, including off-reference checks. Harry offers relevant industry anecdotes regarding fund humility.27:13–30:20 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Partnership Dynamics and the US Marriage Analogy Miles analyzes why VC partnerships break down due to incentives and work ethic discrepancies, comparing GP commitments to 25-year marriages.30:20–34:04 · Guest disagreement 1/10 LP Churn, Fund Concentration, and Taxes Miles breaks down the mathematical headwinds for US endowments, explaining how a 5% annual draw plus 3% higher-ed inflation forces an 8% return target.34:04–42:24 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Fundraising Timelines and Management Stake Risks Miles delivers a masterclass on multi-stage fund scaling, proving mathematically that a $7B vehicle requires $800B in exit market cap to return 4x net. Harry counters that macro outcome sizes are expanding.42:24–45:42 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Index Ventures and Fund Size Discipline Miles praises Index Ventures for maintaining fund size discipline post-2021. Harry pushes on whether $1B-$2B funds represent an awkward middle ground.45:42–48:52 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Math of Venture Returns: Figma and Wiz Outcomes Miles illustrates return dilution by showing how owning 10% of a $20B Figma outcome generates only 0.2x net return for a $7B fund. The conversation addresses fee stacking incentives.48:52–52:07 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Active Management Debates and the Persistence of High Fees Harry challenges the idea of active management, arguing LPs prefer passive managers over GPs who push bad operational choices. Miles argues mega growth funds charging 2&20 are essentially passive public equity managers.52:07–54:40 · Guest disagreement 1/10 LP Decision Making: Performance-Driven Discipline vs. Brand Loyalty Miles criticizes LPs who allocate based on brand names to avoid career risk rather than targeting superior risk-adjusted returns.54:40–57:08 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Acceptance of High GP Fees and Market Dynamics Miles examines fund deployment cycles and praises Mark Suster for selling portfolio positions in 2021 to secure real DPI for LPs.57:08–59:53 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Liquidity Drought and SaaS Valuation Realities Miles contextualizes the current liquidity drought, pointing out that 2022-2024 saw fewer public IPO dollars than post-dot-com crash 2002-2004. He contrasts slow SaaS growth with public Microsoft.59:53–1:05:33 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Direct Portfolio Monitoring and Underwriting Extreme Outcomes Miles shares an incredible story about a 13-year-old fund holding Circle at a 30% discount before its valuation exploded. He analyzes the risks of secondary portfolio sales like Yale's.1:05:33–1:08:21 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Liquidity Hurdles and the Vital Call for IPOs Miles urges venture capitalists to take companies public, explaining how private capital was unnaturally cheaper than public capital for years but public markets now reward quality tech.1:08:21–1:11:02 · Guest disagreement 1/10 CMU's Agnostic Approach to Thematic and Sector-Focused Funds Miles explains CMU's sector-agnostic approach and discusses structural USD/RMB fund misalignment in China caused by US sanctions.1:11:02–1:14:05 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Big Tech M&A: Cash-Rich Buyers and Regulatory Friction Miles breaks down Big Tech's immense cash reserves and explains why regulatory friction forces them into acqui-hires and licensing deals rather than traditional M&A.1:14:05–1:18:27 · Guest disagreement 3/10 OpenAI's High Burn Rate and the Inevitable AI Bubble Miles presents a strong bear thesis on OpenAI, pointing out its $5B-$10B annual burn rate and stating it could go to zero if an AI bubble pops and capital markets freeze.1:18:27–1:20:35 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Cyclical Risks of NVIDIA's Peak Valuation Miles highlights NVIDIA's underlying hardware cyclicality, citing investor Chris Hohn to warn of a potential 70% drawdown during a cyclical demand dip.1:20:35–1:22:47 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Constructive Criticism and the Overranking of 'Founder Friendliness' Miles draws on his college football background to argue that hard coaching beats superficial 'founder friendliness', emphasizing that constructive criticism drives trajectory changes.1:22:47–1:30:19 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Quick-Fire Round: Industry Truths, Red Flags, and GP Behaviors In a rapid-fire session, Miles exposes common GP fundraising lies, discusses GP commit importance, and tells a funny story about playing late-night ping pong with Lee Jacobs to win an allocation.0:38–4:29 · Harry pushing back 0/10 The Interview Begins and Overcoming Cancer Harry begins with an empathetic conversation regarding Miles surviving lymphoma at age 26. The dynamic is collaborative and personal, with no pushback or conflict.4:29–8:28 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Carnegie Mellon's Endowment and Portfolio Construction Miles breaks down CMU's $4B endowment architecture, detailing the 85/15 equity/fixed income split and 50% private allocation. Harry asks clean structural questions.8:28–11:51 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Venture Return Reality and LP Decile Access Miles bluntly states LPs are not compensated for venture risk, backing his claim with historical IRR and DPI benchmark data. Harry raises a mild counterpoint about lagging historical data.11:51–15:49 · Harry pushing back 6/10 The Fallacy of Seed Funds and Selection Harry forcefully challenges the math of $50M-$100M seed funds, calculating average round sizes and check requirements. Miles responds by defending non-consensus deal pricing.15:49–20:22 · Harry pushing back 2/10 The Pillars of Venture and Portfolio Management Miles walks through the five pillars of venture and explains why LPs prefer cash distributions over stock. Harry probes GP markup accuracy and hubris.20:22–27:13 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Proprietary Sourcing, Picking, and GP Diligence Miles discusses deal sourcing and the necessity of conducting 20 reference calls, including off-reference checks. Harry offers relevant industry anecdotes regarding fund humility.27:13–30:20 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Partnership Dynamics and the US Marriage Analogy Miles analyzes why VC partnerships break down due to incentives and work ethic discrepancies, comparing GP commitments to 25-year marriages.30:20–34:04 · Harry pushing back 2/10 LP Churn, Fund Concentration, and Taxes Miles breaks down the mathematical headwinds for US endowments, explaining how a 5% annual draw plus 3% higher-ed inflation forces an 8% return target.34:04–42:24 · Harry pushing back 5/10 Fundraising Timelines and Management Stake Risks Miles delivers a masterclass on multi-stage fund scaling, proving mathematically that a $7B vehicle requires $800B in exit market cap to return 4x net. Harry counters that macro outcome sizes are expanding.42:24–45:42 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Index Ventures and Fund Size Discipline Miles praises Index Ventures for maintaining fund size discipline post-2021. Harry pushes on whether $1B-$2B funds represent an awkward middle ground.45:42–48:52 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Math of Venture Returns: Figma and Wiz Outcomes Miles illustrates return dilution by showing how owning 10% of a $20B Figma outcome generates only 0.2x net return for a $7B fund. The conversation addresses fee stacking incentives.48:52–52:07 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Active Management Debates and the Persistence of High Fees Harry challenges the idea of active management, arguing LPs prefer passive managers over GPs who push bad operational choices. Miles argues mega growth funds charging 2&20 are essentially passive public equity managers.52:07–54:40 · Harry pushing back 2/10 LP Decision Making: Performance-Driven Discipline vs. Brand Loyalty Miles criticizes LPs who allocate based on brand names to avoid career risk rather than targeting superior risk-adjusted returns.54:40–57:08 · Harry pushing back 2/10 The Acceptance of High GP Fees and Market Dynamics Miles examines fund deployment cycles and praises Mark Suster for selling portfolio positions in 2021 to secure real DPI for LPs.57:08–59:53 · Harry pushing back 2/10 The Liquidity Drought and SaaS Valuation Realities Miles contextualizes the current liquidity drought, pointing out that 2022-2024 saw fewer public IPO dollars than post-dot-com crash 2002-2004. He contrasts slow SaaS growth with public Microsoft.59:53–1:05:33 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Direct Portfolio Monitoring and Underwriting Extreme Outcomes Miles shares an incredible story about a 13-year-old fund holding Circle at a 30% discount before its valuation exploded. He analyzes the risks of secondary portfolio sales like Yale's.1:05:33–1:08:21 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Liquidity Hurdles and the Vital Call for IPOs Miles urges venture capitalists to take companies public, explaining how private capital was unnaturally cheaper than public capital for years but public markets now reward quality tech.1:08:21–1:11:02 · Harry pushing back 2/10 CMU's Agnostic Approach to Thematic and Sector-Focused Funds Miles explains CMU's sector-agnostic approach and discusses structural USD/RMB fund misalignment in China caused by US sanctions.1:11:02–1:14:05 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Big Tech M&A: Cash-Rich Buyers and Regulatory Friction Miles breaks down Big Tech's immense cash reserves and explains why regulatory friction forces them into acqui-hires and licensing deals rather than traditional M&A.1:14:05–1:18:27 · Harry pushing back 3/10 OpenAI's High Burn Rate and the Inevitable AI Bubble Miles presents a strong bear thesis on OpenAI, pointing out its $5B-$10B annual burn rate and stating it could go to zero if an AI bubble pops and capital markets freeze.1:18:27–1:20:35 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Cyclical Risks of NVIDIA's Peak Valuation Miles highlights NVIDIA's underlying hardware cyclicality, citing investor Chris Hohn to warn of a potential 70% drawdown during a cyclical demand dip.1:20:35–1:22:47 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Constructive Criticism and the Overranking of 'Founder Friendliness' Miles draws on his college football background to argue that hard coaching beats superficial 'founder friendliness', emphasizing that constructive criticism drives trajectory changes.1:22:47–1:30:19 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Quick-Fire Round: Industry Truths, Red Flags, and GP Behaviors In a rapid-fire session, Miles exposes common GP fundraising lies, discusses GP commit importance, and tells a funny story about playing late-night ping pong with Lee Jacobs to win an allocation.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 31.3% · guest 68.7%0:00 · Harry 31.3% · guest 68.7%3:00 · Harry 24.7% · guest 75.3%3:00 · Harry 24.7% · guest 75.3%6:00 · Harry 12.7% · guest 87.3%6:00 · Harry 12.7% · guest 87.3%9:00 · Harry 18% · guest 82%9:00 · Harry 18% · guest 82%12:00 · Harry 43% · guest 57%12:00 · Harry 43% · guest 57%15:00 · Harry 28.7% · guest 71.3%15:00 · Harry 28.7% · guest 71.3%18:00 · Harry 36.1% · guest 63.9%18:00 · Harry 36.1% · guest 63.9%21:00 · Harry 45.5% · guest 54.5%21:00 · Harry 45.5% · guest 54.5%24:00 · Harry 11.7% · guest 88.3%24:00 · Harry 11.7% · guest 88.3%27:00 · Harry 20.5% · guest 79.5%27:00 · Harry 20.5% · guest 79.5%30:00 · Harry 28.8% · guest 71.2%30:00 · Harry 28.8% · guest 71.2%33:00 · Harry 26.7% · guest 73.3%33:00 · Harry 26.7% · guest 73.3%36:00 · Harry 1.4% · guest 98.6%36:00 · Harry 1.4% · guest 98.6%39:00 · Harry 33.6% · guest 66.4%39:00 · Harry 33.6% · guest 66.4%42:00 · Harry 26.8% · guest 73.2%42:00 · Harry 26.8% · guest 73.2%45:00 · Harry 26% · guest 74%45:00 · Harry 26% · guest 74%48:00 · Harry 23.3% · guest 76.7%48:00 · Harry 23.3% · guest 76.7%51:00 · Harry 31.5% · guest 68.5%51:00 · Harry 31.5% · guest 68.5%54:00 · Harry 27.1% · guest 72.9%54:00 · Harry 27.1% · guest 72.9%57:00 · Harry 19.4% · guest 80.6%57:00 · Harry 19.4% · guest 80.6%1:00:00 · Harry 13.9% · guest 86.1%1:00:00 · Harry 13.9% · guest 86.1%1:03:00 · Harry 25.1% · guest 74.9%1:03:00 · Harry 25.1% · guest 74.9%1:06:00 · Harry 19.7% · guest 80.3%1:06:00 · Harry 19.7% · guest 80.3%1:09:00 · Harry 28.8% · guest 71.2%1:09:00 · Harry 28.8% · guest 71.2%1:12:00 · Harry 18.1% · guest 81.9%1:12:00 · Harry 18.1% · guest 81.9%1:15:00 · Harry 17.9% · guest 82.1%1:15:00 · Harry 17.9% · guest 82.1%1:18:00 · Harry 11.3% · guest 88.7%1:18:00 · Harry 11.3% · guest 88.7%1:21:00 · Harry 18.9% · guest 81.1%1:21:00 · Harry 18.9% · guest 81.1%1:24:00 · Harry 10.6% · guest 89.4%1:24:00 · Harry 10.6% · guest 89.4%1:27:00 · Harry 21.8% · guest 78.2%1:27:00 · Harry 21.8% · guest 78.2%1:30:00 · Harry 45.4% · guest 54.6%1:30:00 · Harry 45.4% · guest 54.6%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 1:14:11 Miles argues OpenAI could go to zero

Miles forcefully rejects the assumption that OpenAI and Anthropic are guaranteed winners, warning that burning $5B-$10B annually without self-funding creates fatal risk if capital markets freeze.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 11:56 Harry attacks $50M-$100M seed fund math

Harry aggressively interrupts and challenges the viability of mid-sized seed funds, running through check size and ownership math to argue they leave managers with subscale positions.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 36:43 Miles breaks down the $800B exit requirement math

Miles delivers a detailed dollar-weighted math breakdown proving that a $7B multi-stage fund requires $800B in exit market cap to deliver a 4x net return to LPs.

Harry holds his own ▶ 11:56 Harry demonstrates seed check size mechanics

Harry showcases deep industry domain knowledge by demonstrating how average seed round dynamics destroy the portfolio economics of $50M-$100M funds.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
The Interview Begins and Overcoming Cancer 2300 Harry begins with an empathetic conversation regarding Miles surviving lymphoma at age 26. The dynamic is collaborative and personal, with no pushback or conflict.
Carnegie Mellon's Endowment and Portfolio Construction 3500 Miles breaks down CMU's $4B endowment architecture, detailing the 85/15 equity/fixed income split and 50% private allocation. Harry asks clean structural questions.
Venture Return Reality and LP Decile Access 4623 Miles bluntly states LPs are not compensated for venture risk, backing his claim with historical IRR and DPI benchmark data. Harry raises a mild counterpoint about lagging historical data.
The Fallacy of Seed Funds and Selection 7536 Harry forcefully challenges the math of $50M-$100M seed funds, calculating average round sizes and check requirements. Miles responds by defending non-consensus deal pricing.
The Pillars of Venture and Portfolio Management 5612 Miles walks through the five pillars of venture and explains why LPs prefer cash distributions over stock. Harry probes GP markup accuracy and hubris.
Proprietary Sourcing, Picking, and GP Diligence 5512 Miles discusses deal sourcing and the necessity of conducting 20 reference calls, including off-reference checks. Harry offers relevant industry anecdotes regarding fund humility.
Partnership Dynamics and the US Marriage Analogy 4521 Miles analyzes why VC partnerships break down due to incentives and work ethic discrepancies, comparing GP commitments to 25-year marriages.
LP Churn, Fund Concentration, and Taxes 5612 Miles breaks down the mathematical headwinds for US endowments, explaining how a 5% annual draw plus 3% higher-ed inflation forces an 8% return target.
Fundraising Timelines and Management Stake Risks 6835 Miles delivers a masterclass on multi-stage fund scaling, proving mathematically that a $7B vehicle requires $800B in exit market cap to return 4x net. Harry counters that macro outcome sizes are expanding.
Index Ventures and Fund Size Discipline 5623 Miles praises Index Ventures for maintaining fund size discipline post-2021. Harry pushes on whether $1B-$2B funds represent an awkward middle ground.
The Math of Venture Returns: Figma and Wiz Outcomes 6723 Miles illustrates return dilution by showing how owning 10% of a $20B Figma outcome generates only 0.2x net return for a $7B fund. The conversation addresses fee stacking incentives.
Active Management Debates and the Persistence of High Fees 6624 Harry challenges the idea of active management, arguing LPs prefer passive managers over GPs who push bad operational choices. Miles argues mega growth funds charging 2&20 are essentially passive public equity managers.
LP Decision Making: Performance-Driven Discipline vs. Brand Loyalty 4512 Miles criticizes LPs who allocate based on brand names to avoid career risk rather than targeting superior risk-adjusted returns.
The Acceptance of High GP Fees and Market Dynamics 5512 Miles examines fund deployment cycles and praises Mark Suster for selling portfolio positions in 2021 to secure real DPI for LPs.
The Liquidity Drought and SaaS Valuation Realities 6722 Miles contextualizes the current liquidity drought, pointing out that 2022-2024 saw fewer public IPO dollars than post-dot-com crash 2002-2004. He contrasts slow SaaS growth with public Microsoft.
Direct Portfolio Monitoring and Underwriting Extreme Outcomes 5812 Miles shares an incredible story about a 13-year-old fund holding Circle at a 30% discount before its valuation exploded. He analyzes the risks of secondary portfolio sales like Yale's.
Liquidity Hurdles and the Vital Call for IPOs 5622 Miles urges venture capitalists to take companies public, explaining how private capital was unnaturally cheaper than public capital for years but public markets now reward quality tech.
CMU's Agnostic Approach to Thematic and Sector-Focused Funds 5612 Miles explains CMU's sector-agnostic approach and discusses structural USD/RMB fund misalignment in China caused by US sanctions.
Big Tech M&A: Cash-Rich Buyers and Regulatory Friction 5712 Miles breaks down Big Tech's immense cash reserves and explains why regulatory friction forces them into acqui-hires and licensing deals rather than traditional M&A.
OpenAI's High Burn Rate and the Inevitable AI Bubble 6733 Miles presents a strong bear thesis on OpenAI, pointing out its $5B-$10B annual burn rate and stating it could go to zero if an AI bubble pops and capital markets freeze.
The Cyclical Risks of NVIDIA's Peak Valuation 5733 Miles highlights NVIDIA's underlying hardware cyclicality, citing investor Chris Hohn to warn of a potential 70% drawdown during a cyclical demand dip.
Constructive Criticism and the Overranking of 'Founder Friendliness' 5611 Miles draws on his college football background to argue that hard coaching beats superficial 'founder friendliness', emphasizing that constructive criticism drives trajectory changes.
Quick-Fire Round: Industry Truths, Red Flags, and GP Behaviors 6623 In a rapid-fire session, Miles exposes common GP fundraising lies, discusses GP commit importance, and tells a funny story about playing late-night ping pong with Lee Jacobs to win an allocation.

Statements from this episode (76)

Assertion Partly supported
Only Top-Decile VC Managers Consistently Beat Public Markets
“Because at that point, top decile, you are achieving returns above the PME consistently. But below that, even top quartile, you're not.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 0:19
Assertion Supported
Carnegie Mellon Allocates 85% of Its $4B Endowment to Equity
“We manage four billion on behalf of the university. And so starting at the highest level, we think of equity and fixed income as kind of the two parts of the endowment. 85% of the endowment is equity. 15% is fixed income. That is our allocation. And we manage …”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 4:46
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
CMU's Private Investments Were Self-Funding for Three Years
“From a liquidity perspective, we've been fortunate compared to most endowments where that private equity book has been self-funding the past three years, so our distributions Have paid for our capital calls over the past three years. Now, the sub asset classes…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 6:00
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Venture Capital Represents Nearly 25% of Carnegie Mellon's Total Endowment
“For us, venture globally is a little less than 25%, the total endowment, so almost half of that private equity book.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 6:49
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
CMU Is 5 to 10 Percentage Points Overweight Venture Versus Peers
“I'd say we're overweight venture, but I call it anywhere from five to 10 points versus most other endowments of our size. We're underweight hedge funds and real assets, which would be real estate and natural resources”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 6:58
Assertion Supported
Mature Venture Funds Yield a Median 8% Net IRR
“The median IRR is about eight percent net for that asset class, and the top quartile is a bit higher, 15%, but the MOIC is about two and a half x, right?”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 9:06
Assertion Supported
Top-Quartile VC Funds From 1998-2015 Yield 1.8x DPI
“Top quartile DPI from 1998 15 year vintage funds per vintage year up until 2015 is 1.8 X top quartile.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 9:27
Opinion
$50M to $100M Seed Funds Are the Worst Market Position
“I find it really funny how all LPs love 50 to a hundred million dollar seed funds, and when you actually run the maths now on average seed fund, seed round sizes, that's the worst place to be.”
Harry Stebbings Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 11:56
Insight
Multi-Stage VC Is 70% Access, Early-Stage Is 70% Picking
“I would say if you are a multi-stage firm that is, you know, deploying large checks at scale. 70% access. 30% picking. If you are a small and nimble early stage fund that is trying to break into the mold, I'm gonna say it's, you know, 80%, 70% picking. I'll fl…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 14:36
Disclosure
CMU Endowment Commits at Least $10M to $80M-$1B Funds
“For us and our commitment size, which at the low end, call it ten million bucks anything from at the low end, we'll do an eighty million dollar fund at the high end, you know, anywhere from 400 to a billion, right?”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 15:15
Opinion
Union Square Ventures Is the Best at Active Portfolio Selling
“Union Square broadly, and we're not an investor there, we wish we were, but I think they've perennially been the best at selling, and they've got a very strict protocol that they run through, you know, from years eight to 12 on those funds, and with those foun…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 16:24
Disclosure
CMU Endowment Prefers Cash Distributions Over Stock to Avoid Pricing Lags
“We like them to distribute cash versus stock. Reason being, if they distribute stock to us, there is sometimes a time lag between when we sell that and when others sell that, and so there could be a one to two percent pricing discrepancy on that versus them di…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 16:53
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Accel and Sequoia Hold Portfolio Books at 20% to 30% Discounts
“Usually the multi-stage firms think your perennial, like Excels, Or Sequoia. They're taking very aggressive discounts on, on basically all of their securities. Even if it's a great company that is maybe achieving even a higher price on the secondary market, th…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 18:10
Disclosure
CMU Independently Underwrites Top 10 NAVs for Manager Diligence
“20, 21 caused us to create new muscles in regards to underwriting as a group as well. And so for any re-up or any new manager, we diligence, we'll look at the top 10 company navs. Within that general partnership, we'll underwrite those companies ourselves. And…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 18:30
Insight
Premier VC Firms Rely on Brand Over Systematic Sourcing
“I think there is no systematic sourcing strategy. It's the partners and the brands are so strong and they're so networked in the, you know, S tier founder community that they're just in, they're just gonna be a first call for a lot of these firms.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 20:51
Disclosure
CMU Endowment Conducts 20 Reference Calls for New VC Funds
“I mean, we're, the way we think about referencing, you know, when we do a new fund, we're looking for at least 20 references calls, right?”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 25:40
Disclosure
CMU Focuses GP Diligence on Interpersonal and Partnership Risk
“Perspective on strategy, not so much. We are very much trying to find interpersonal risk and partnership risk. Those are, two things that we are really digging.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 26:27
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Recent VC Partnership Turnover Exceeds Previous Eight Years Combined
“The amount of change you've seen at partnerships over the past two years is the most I've seen combined in my, you know, eight year histories in LP.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 27:35
Disclosure
Carnegie Mellon Rarely Invests in VC Spinout Funds
“Yeah, we historically have not done many, if any, spinouts.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 28:40
Disclosure
Carnegie Mellon's Endowment Backed Kevin Hartz's A-Star
“Kevin Hart's at A-Stars is, is, is a new partner of ours, and he was at Founders Funds for a few years.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 28:51
Insight
Early-Stage Venture Funds Require 15 to 18 Years to Liquidate Fully
“If you're in an early-stage venture fund, it's gonna take at least 15 years for that fund to be wrapped up, probably 18. Right. To be fully done. All positions liquidated.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 29:42
Disclosure
Carnegie Mellon Targets 25-Year, Three-Fund Commitments With New VCs
“And when we back a new manager, we want to back them for at least three funds. So call it, you know, 25 years of an illiquid relationship.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 29:55
Insight
Ideal LP Concentration for VC Funds Is Under 10%
“Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, best case scenario, you don't have anyone more than 10%, but if you're raising a fifty million dollar fund or a hundred million dollar fund and you can, you know, secure a 10, 20, thirty million dollar check and they're long term alig…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 31:41
Assertion Supported
Only Five US Endowments Face the 8% Tax Rate
“In, in particular, certain endowments where they're going to start getting taxed at the eight percent range. That's five endowments.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 32:29
Assertion Supported
US Endowments Need an 8% Return to Maintain Purchasing Power
“The way an endowment works, you got a five percent draw every year, and then inflation is called three percent for higher education here in the U.S. So just to maintain the corpus, the purchasing power of that endowment, you need the eight percent return, righ…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 33:21
Assertion Supported
Lack of Distributions Is the Main Headwind for VC Re-Ups
“It'll still be the idiosyncratic headwinds of there's just no capital coming back from venture, right? That's the headwind to the asset class for LPs re-upping today.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 33:56
Opinion
Selling Management Company Stakes Is a Massive LP Red Flag
“It's a, it is a massive red flag for us, and I would say most institutional LPs.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 34:43
Disclosure
CMU Endowment Targets a 4x Net Return on Venture Fund Investments
“And so for us, when we do a venture fund, our target is a forex net. That's our goal.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 38:15
Insight
$7B Multi-Stage VC Funds Require $800B in Exit Cap for 4x Net
“You're close to, you know, eight hundred billion of market cap needed to return a Forex net for those multi-stage funds. Now, for reference, twenty-twenty-one, the best exit year of all time, there was 850 billion-ish of market cap exit value from that year. O…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 38:34
Assertion Supported
Only 11 Venture-Backed IPOs Have Surpassed $50B in Market Cap
“There's been 11 fifty billion dollar IPOs ever. Venture backed. 11. Ok? The two largest venture backed IPOs ever, Or Facebook in 2012 and Alibaba in 2014.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 39:53
Prediction Open · timeframe Aug 2035
$100B Venture IPOs Will Remain Rare Generational Outcomes Through 2035
“So, so my guess is that a hundred billion dollar IPO over the next 10 years is still going to be a generational outcome. And so the question I throw back is, you know, do you think there's going to be 10, 20 A hundred billion dollar plus IPOs. I do not think s…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 40:17
Assertion Partly supported
Index Ventures Is the Largest Shareholder in Figma, Dream Games, and Wiz
“Largest shareholder in Figma, largest shareholder in Dream Games, largest shareholder in Wiz you know, second largest shareholder in Scale.ai, Revolut.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 42:45
Opinion
Index Ventures Has the Most Performance-Driven Culture Seen by CMU
“And they don't, they are the most performant driven culture that we see.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 43:18
Prediction Not checkable as stated
$1B to $2B VC Funds Like Index Will Continue to Thrive
“I absolutely think they will continue to survive and thrive at that range.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 44:10
Prediction Open · timeframe Aug 2028
Figma Will Likely Price Between $20B and $25B
“It's probably going to, we'll see where it prices, call it 20 to twenty five billion.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 46:02
Insight
Owning 10% of a $20B Company Returns 0.2x for a $7B Fund
“If you're a GC, their last fundraiser, seven billion, say you own 10% of a Figma, which is a generational company, two billion, you know, they're going to take 20% of that. I mean, you've returned what? Point zero point two X. You need 15 Figma's.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 46:06
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Wiz's $30B Outcome Returned Only One-Third of Insight's Fund
“Wiz, which was obviously a, you know, 30, thirty one billion dollar outcome, you know, the GDP of the country. And it returned a third of Insight's fund.”
Harry Stebbings Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 46:27
Opinion
Mega-Scale Venture Funds Are the Highest-Margin Businesses Ever Created
“These business models, these GPs are creating are some of the best high margin businesses Ever created, right?”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 47:18
Opinion
Venture Capital Fee Structures Must Change for Large Funds
“You know, we really try to understand has the magic bond been broken between GPs and LPs, which, you know, leads us to, you know, like we think the fee structures need to change to accommodate for that.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 47:51
Opinion
Large Venture Funds Charge 2-and-20 Fees for Passive Investing
“You are essentially acting as a long only public equity investor, right? You're not, you know, actively, you know, managing the company. They've got their own HR team. They're doing all their own hiring. You know, they've got a 20 person product team. They've …”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 48:20
Insight
Active Early-Stage VC Management Drives Bad Decisions
“I work with many, and when they actively manage, they do not get the right decisions. They push managers to do things they shouldn't do. They push them to go enterprise before they should, push them to do more products, push them to scale faster, take more cas…”
Harry Stebbings Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 48:59
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Managing $15B in VC AUM Guarantees Billionaire Status
“If you had fifteen billion in AUM, which, you know, God bless, I hope you do someday you're gonna become a billionaire off that fund. Off those funds, right? And that's the difference, right? Is, is you need that capital as a true early-stage venture capital f…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 49:31
Prediction Not checkable as stated
VC Fee Structures Will Never Change Due to LP Lack of Leverage
“So we're never gonna get this fee structure change.”
Harry Stebbings Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 49:59
Disclosure
CMU Endowment Is Willing to Pay 2.5% Fees and 30% Carry
“If you're raising you know, that early stage fund, the core five hundred million dollar Series A fund, charge us your, you know, two and a half and 20, and if you're good enough, two and a half and 30. We're okay with that, right?”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 51:35
Opinion
Growth VC Funds Should Charge 1% Management Fees and 10% Carry
“But those growth funds that are really for scaled businesses that are mature assets, like, you should be charging long-only public equity fees, which are one in 10, and if you really love your LPs, it'd be zero in 10, but, or budget-based, right? Based on the …”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 51:47
Disclosure
Carnegie Mellon Never Re-Ups in VC Funds Out of Loyalty
“Us, no. I mean, we are in an extreme performance-driven culture.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 52:25
Opinion
Some LPs Choose to Ignore Huge GP Management Fees
“I think certain LPs choose to just not even think about it, frankly.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 54:51
Opinion
LPs Shouldn't Blame GPs for Raising Massive Funds
“I'll never blame you for doing that, and I'll never blame a GP for, I'll never bash a GP saying, oh, how dare you, right? It's the market, like, and you're, you've obviously done something well enough that's allowing you to raise that capital. It's our choice …”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 55:13
Assertion Supported
Mark Suster Aggressively Sold Portfolio Stakes During the 2021 Market Peak
“Mark Suster, I give him all the credit in the world. He's been in the game for a long time and upfront. He saw 20, 21 as an insane period. And he strip sailed like majority of his portfolios and his funds. For a very good price. DPI in the pocket. Like I, all …”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 56:48
Prediction Held up
US and European VC Fundraising Will Hit Multi-Year Lows
“We'll see what, you know, Q three and Q four look like, but in the U S this is going to be the lowest year since 17 in Europe. Same. So it goes back a bit further, maybe to 20 16.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 57:18
Assertion Supported
2002-2004 Raised More IPO Dollars Than 2022-2024
“2002 to 2004. You had more dollars raised in the public markets from IPOs than you did from 2022 to 20 24. And with an asset class, 10 times the size.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 57:50
Insight
IPO Markets Are Never Closed, It Is Purely About Price
“And I am not a believer ever that the IPO markets are closed. It's purely a function of price, right?”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 58:39
Opinion
Private Equity Will Not Save the Venture Market
“I think PE is not coming to save us, like everyone thinks it will.”
Harry Stebbings Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 59:31
Disclosure
Carnegie Mellon Requests Detailed Financial Metrics for Top 10 Fund Assets
“We ask for trending revenue, trending gross profit, and trending free cash flow for the top 10 nabs of every, every fund of we underwrite.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 59:57
Assertion Not checkable as stated
CMU's 2012 VC Fund Will Add 3x Return in Year 13
“This is a 13 year fund that is essentially going to do an extra three turns on the fund in its 13th year.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:02:46
Insight
Selling Venture Secondaries Risks Forfeiting Late-Stage Fat-Tail Returns
“And so that is, that's the risk Of selling secondaries as a long-term venture investor is that you're going to have these crazy right-tail outcomes in the fund that could come to fruition at years eight, nine, 10, 1112, 13, that you're traditionally, even if I…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:03:21
Disclosure
CMU's Venture Book Is Self-Funding for the First Time Since 2021
“We are thankful to say that we're now self-funding in our venture book this year, which is give us a round of applause. I mean, it's the first time since 2021.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:05:57
Insight
Top Companies Delayed IPOs Because Private Capital Was Cheaper Than Public
“For the longest period of time, private market capital was cheaper than public market capital, which is the most mind boggling statement as like a fundamental investor ever. Like it's hard to fathom that, right? But that was the case. And so that is why the be…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:06:40
Opinion
Public Markets Are Ready for IPOs and VCs Should Take Companies Public
“The public markets are now pricing risk very differently than they have over the three, the last three years. You look at circle, you look at, you know, Nebius, you look at core weave, you look at Palantir, you look at cloud flare. Like these are all businesse…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:07:04
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Venture Needs Multiple Years of Strong Liquidity to Fully Recover
“It's been such a dearth of liquidity over the past three years that, like, one year is not gonna solve the industry's problem, right? So we're gonna need, like, multiple years of really good liquidity to get back to a normal state”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:08:03
Disclosure
CMU Endowment Invested in Only One Sector Fund in 3.5 Years
“You know, we've done one new sector focus fund over the past three and a half years.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:08:55
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Carnegie Mellon Backed a China Fund Returning Over 20x Net
“We had a fund out of China that produced over a 20 X net return to LPs.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:09:10
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Top Chinese Founders Are Shifting Fundraising to US, Singapore, and London
“And frankly, you know, a lot of the best, you know, Chinese founders have chosen to raise elsewhere, whether in the US or Singapore or London it's a tough place.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:10:53
Prediction Held up
Wiz Deal Approval Will Trigger a Big Tech Acquisition Spree
“I think if Wiz gets approved, I think Every other large Mac seven company is going to see a green light in regards to making big, splashy acquisitions again, which is a good thing.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:11:43
Assertion Partly supported
Big Four Tech Giants Generate $600B in Annual Operating Cash Flow
“You look at Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta combined, I mean, they're doing six hundred billion of operating cash flow, just cash coming off the company every single year”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:11:57
Assertion Partly supported
Wiz Acquisition Features the Largest M&A Breakup Fee Ever
“You look at the Wiz deal, There's a 10% breakup fee there. Largest breakup fee ever for an M&A transaction.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:12:53
Assertion Supported
OpenAI Is Burning $5B to $10B Per Year
“They're burning Five to ten billion dollars a year, right?”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:14:36
Prediction Open · timeframe Aug 2030
An AI Bubble Popping in Equity Markets Is Inevitable
“This would be the ultimate anomaly if a bubble did not pop in AI, right? You look at past historic, incredible technological moments, right? You think of the railroad, you think of cars, you think of electricity, you think of steamboats, you think of the inter…”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:14:46
Assertion Supported
Hyperscalers Will Invest $1T in CapEx From 2024 to 2027
“When you look at the hyperscalers, just take them, for example, you look at, you know, 20, 24 to 20, 27 estimates, it's a trillion dollars of capex they're putting into the ground.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:17:51
Assertion Partly supported
NVIDIA's Financials Show Negative Revenue Growth Every Three Years
“NVIDIA is a cyclical business at the end of the day. You look at their historical financials over the past 20 years, essentially like every three years, they've had extreme negative year over year revenue growth. Now it rebounds, right? But this is a hardware …”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:19:07
Opinion
The Venture Capital Industry Overrates Founder Friendliness
“I think we way overrank founder friendliness.”
Harry Stebbings Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:22:16
Disclosure
Carnegie Mellon Endowment Does Not Screen VC Managers for Founder Friendliness
“Yeah, I mean, we do not, when we're sourcing and we're doing reference work, that is not something we try to dig out. Like we want the most founder friendly GPs. That's not something we source for.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:22:20
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Half of VC Firms Falsely Claim They Will Never Raise Over $400M
“I would say Miles, this is the perfect fund size for us. We want to be a union square. We want to be a benchmark. 300 to four hundred million, this is the perfect size. We're never going to raise a bigger fund. I hear that. I kid you not. At least every other …”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:23:24
Insight
GP Commitment Is a Top Forward Indicator of VC Performance
“Frankly, like we have two quantitative data points outside of fund size and pass returns that are the best forward looking indicator for future returns of our funds. And one of them is is GP commitment.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:24:19
Opinion
Kevin Hartz and A-Stars Are the Most Underrated Emerging Managers
“If I say his name, he'll probably raise a bigger fund, but I'll say, I think Kevin Hart's in A-Stars. I think they've done fabulously well as a partner.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:24:41
Assertion Supported
A VC Manager Marked OpenSea at $13B in 2023
“The bad one, I mean, this one forever stands out, was we underwrote a manager in in twenty-twenty-three that was holding OpenSea at thirteen billion, which, like, I, that one was like.”
Miles Dieffenbach Aug 4, 2025 ▶ 1:29:56

Shorts cut from this episode

▶ Why Index Are The Best At Selecting In VC · 20VC with Harry (@42:22) ▶ Big Tech’s Green Light to Buy? · 20VC with Harry Stebbings (@1:11:45) ▶ The $140BN Problem · 20VC with Harry Stebbings (@36:50) ▶ “Take Your Companies Public” · 20VC with Harry Stebbings (@0:00)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.