why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Amodei: Advanced AI systems will eventually develop consciousness and moral significance
“I do think when our AI system, when our AI systems get advanced enough, I suspect they'll have something that, you know, resembles what we would call consciousness or moral significance. I do think it'll happen at some point.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Amodei: AI will automate coding first, then end-to-end software engineering
“I think coding is going away first, or coding is being, you know, done by the AI models first, and then the broader task of software engineering will take longer, but I think that is, you know, that doing that end to end, I think that is going to happen as wel…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Amodei: Static training data is becoming less central than dynamic RL data
“Static data is becoming less important and what we might call like dynamic data that the model creates itself is, you know, for reinforcement learning is becoming more important. So, you know, I don't think data is, is, is quite the most central thing anymore,…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Amodei: AI will drive a biotech renaissance curing many diseases
“I, I'm positive on, like, I think biotech is about to have a renaissance. Like, ultimately we'll be driven by AI. You know, I'm not going to name a particular company, but like you know, nor will I say whether I think it's better to bet on the big pharma compa…”