why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Amodei: Anthropic studies prove AI usage can de-skill human coders
“You know, we did some studies around code and showed that, you know, depending on how you use the model, you know, we can see, De-skilling in terms of writing code, right? There are different ways to use the model, and some of them don't cause de-skilling, and…”
Assertion Supported
Amodei: California AI bill advocated by Anthropic exempts sub-$500M revenue companies
“The regulation we've advocated for example, SB in California exempted everyone who makes under five hundred million dollars a year in, in in, in, in revenue, right? SB, SB was a transparency law, which you know basically requires companies to you know, to show…”
Assertion Supported
Amodei: Anthropic's Long-Term Benefit Trust appoints majority of board
“We have an unusual governance structure, something called the long-term benefit
Trust.
you know, it's a body that, that kind of ultimately appoints, you know, the majority of the board members for Anthropic and is, you know, made up of financially disinterest…”
Assertion Supported
Amodei: Interpretability research has identified concept neurons and rhyming circuits in LLMs
“We've been able to find, you know, neurons that correspond to very specific concepts, neural circuits that correspond to, you know, keep track of how to do rhymes in poetry, and so we're starting to understand what these models Do, right?”