The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Thompson: Stratechery avoids interviewing VCs because they talk their book
“That's why I generally, as a rule, don't have VCs on to do the introductory interviews. Because it's kind of hard to get, like, a real take, because that, that, that is, you know, such a motivation.”
Stratechery could maximize its value with advertising and a venture fund
“If you really wanted to maximize the value of strategic rate, it would just be ads and a venture fund for sure.”
Coogan: Moltbook AI agents make zero mention of TSMC or Dario Amodei
“There was also no there were no mentions of AI keywords. Like, if Skynet's really waking up, are they not thinking about Dario Amade? Yeah, so no mentions of Stratechery, no mentions of Dwarkesh, no mentions of TSMC, Abilene, Amadei, TPU.”