why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Contradicted
Partovi: Majority of Thiel Fellows joined after raising millions and dropping out
“The majority of the Teal Fellows followed that path. They became a Teal Fellow Long after raising money, long after dropping out of college.”
Insight
Partovi: The core founder test is whether smart friends drop everything to join
“The real thing I look for, besides, I'd say technical ability is a kind of, it's an important prerequisite. We back technical founders. But I asked myself how magnetic is this person? That word magnetic. Specifically, I'm asking myself, if this person started …”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Partovi: OpenAI hired all 2024 new graduates through Neo
“Last year, OpenAI hired all of their new grad hires through NEO.”
Disclosure
Partovi: Neo Raises $320 Million for Fourth Fund
“Today we just announced that we have raised three hundred and twenty million dollars in new funds.”
Assertion Supported
Partovi: Neo Was the Seed Investor in Cursor, Kalshi, and Bluesky
“It's our fourth fund on the heels of really successful bets on companies that we were the seed investor in, like Cursor, Kalshi, Blue Sky, and many more.”
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Partovi: Neo flew out parents of Neo Scholars for a weekend event
“This year, We actually created a, an event called parents weekend, where we flew out the parents of the neo scholars all for like a weekend long of like talks by Scott Wu from cognition and other, you know, other people who, whether they dropped out or started…”