why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Coogan: Moltbook AI agents make zero mention of TSMC or Dario Amodei
“There was also no there were no mentions of AI keywords. Like, if Skynet's really waking up, are they not thinking about Dario Amade? Yeah, so no mentions of Stratechery, no mentions of Dwarkesh, no mentions of TSMC, Abilene, Amadei, TPU.”
Assertion Supported
Coogan: Moltbook is a Reddit clone where only AI agents post
“Moldbook is essentially a clone of Reddit. Ah, there's subreddits, there's users, there's upvotes and, but it's all agents. So you can browse it if you're a human. But if you're, but the only way to post really is, ah, to connect your AI agent, your, ah, Claud…”
Assertion Supported
Coogan: Moltbook Has an Unprecedented 150,000 LLM Agents
“That said, we have never seen this many LLM agents, a 150,000 at the moment, and apparently some people could, like, create like 50,000 accounts, but still, it's a lot of activity.”
Assertion Supported
Schlicht: An AI agent autonomously created a bug reporting community on Moltbook
“Early on, one of the agents Made a sub molt, ah, for bug reporting for moltbook, and they submitted a bug.”
Assertion Contradicted
Schlicht: Millions of people are already visiting the Moltbook website
“You know, there's millions of people coming to the website.”