The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Dr. Jonas Kuno no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q of money, I'm going to really impact cancer and heart disease, but really it's in a preventative way as opposed to, ok, You know, we found a new chemotherapy, which is, which is less toxic, therefore more effective. Everybody wants that. We want, you know, even if we don't have this cancer, we want that for everyone. But I think, don't we really want to avoid it to begin with?

A Absolutely. So the best way to treat a disease is to avoid having it in the first place. And we know enough now that there are strategies where we can prevent many diseases if we You know, it requires some work on the part of the patient, you know, because you need to sort of make certain changes and you know, this need to be knowledgeable in what you put in your body, how you exercise, um, certain supplements, all these things can play a huge role. Um, the unfortunate thing is there is no money. So the, the pharmaceutical industry is not interested in this model and interestingly, even the medical, medical education. So we are heavily influenced by the pharma industry, of course, and the model has been so far you present with some illness and then we figure out what it is and then we, Give you a strategy on how to treat it. Right. And that of course, you know, uh, is the most lucrative in terms of, uh, the pharmaceuticals we need and the surgical interventions and all that, you know, but that's of course not in your interest. Your interest would be, Hey, how can I, even if I have, especially when I have family history, take steps to prevent getting the disease in the first place. And I think that's, and that's also why I'm, what I'm very interested in, but you're absolutely right. There's, there's hurdles. There are, um, treatments that are sort of fighting to recognize, I men…

AI assessment note: “Absolutely. So the best way to treat a disease is to avoid having it”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, about 40 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.