The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

David Bailey no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 5 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.85

Q Location, uh, you find a similar building, and, and by that, Especially around where we live. One of the things you're doing is you're looking at what year it was built, right?

A Yeah. When, when I look at similar building, we have things here called like tuck under parking and we have, we have, you know, all sorts of different variables. So it usually does go back to about approximately year built, but then you, even within year built, you have flat roof versus pitch roof. Pitch roof obviously lasts a lot longer. So you look at all these, you take the buildings apart and then I pull the analysis Of my other buildings, and then that's when I can really spot where a building is operating inefficiently. And for instance, this one building, the plumbing expenses were historically running 20, 30,000 a year, which is ridiculous. Why would you spend 25,000 a year for plumbing repairs when the cost to re-pipe is a 123,000?

AI assessment note: “So it usually does go back to about approximately year built”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, about 40 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.