The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Held: Content quantity matters more than quality when growing an audience
“I think that was like the really big breakthroughs for me. It's not quality, it's quantity. It's about always having content there for them to consume and building that habit. And then over time you focus on quality”
Held: Crypto wealth advisory must use subscriptions, not AUM fees
“It's a services company and you can't take BIPs on AUM. That's like an old way to do it. You'd have to figure out some sort of new model that's maybe more subscription or something like that.”
Held: Missing a day of tweeting loses algorithmic relevancy on Twitter
“Consistency, I think is the number one thing that people forget. I have not missed tweeting a day in three years. If you do, you lose your spot in the relevancy engine with Twitter.”
Held: Content serves as modern MVP before building products
“It's very low effort to find your MVP versus before you had to go buy a warehouse and start producing things. You just produce content. And if that content resonates and people click and want to figure out what products you'd recommend for them, Then you can g…”