The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Lemkin: Unemployed tech workers rejected jobs under $200k requiring direct individual work
“Enough that I had like a micro connection that had been out of work for six months and I gave them jobs. All of them in the end basically said, I want to make 200 K or more only to do meetings or manage teams. None of them were willing to do any work themselve…”
Shah offers to write a $5M seed check for decentralized LinkedIn
“I will write the five million dollar check for you to go do it as far as a seed round or up to five million if you want to let other people in.”
Shah predicts LinkedIn's utility will asymptotically diminish over time
“Over time, the asymptotic move for LinkedIn is, Like diminishing utility, right? It's like, it's just going to become painful, and then there's a cap on where you can go with it.”
Puri predicts Twitter and LinkedIn will be decentralized in 1-10 years
“This is what the next Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebooks are going to look like in either one or 10 years.”
Wilkinson: AI agent replaced assistant for pre-meeting research briefs
“Like I have a, I have an agent that preps me for every meeting. So, 30 minutes before every meeting, I get a text and it says, hey, you're meeting Sean and Sam. You were emailing them about this topic. You're going to invest in their company. And here's two bi…”