The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Dehghani: Centralized data architecture creates systems fragile to macro-level change
“Centralization of the data, centralization of the organization, functional division between the data and non-data, those are the things that have led to kind of a system that is fragile to scale and change at the macro level, not at the bits and bytes level, r…”
Dehghani: Enterprise data lake migration should start with data consumer needs
“I think you start going backward from your consumers of the data data lakes. So look at who's accessing it, why they're accessing it, what data do they need? Work backward and go back to the source.”
Dehghani: True data immutability requires both event and processing timestamps
“The data can be only immutable if we build two time timestamps into every single kind of representation of the data, and those two timestamps are when something actually happened, and when we process that information, our understanding of that data.”