The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

clear all ✕

why aren't all 1 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Prediction Not checkable as stated
Tim Hwang predicts AI models will enable automated 'high-frequency litigation'
“In the future we might have something like, ah, high frequency litigation, and that's, I don't think that's too far from the truth in terms of being able to understand and, ah, predict these types of outcomes based off of, ah, past datasets.”
Tim Hwang Jan 16, 2014 ▶ 17:51 Tim Hwang, FiscalNote // Data Driven NYC 21 // Dec 2013 (Hosted by FirstMark Capital)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 400 conversations transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.