Tim Hwang
1 appearance on the record.
computed by AI from the episodes · how this works → · full disclaimer →
0 supported 1 partly supported 0 contradicted 4 not checkable as stated how the 5 claims stand · each chip opens the sources
1 prediction · 4 assertions · every statement was checked. The prediction and assertions are the 5 claims: statements the public record can support or contradict. 1 is resolved, and 4 name no date, number or outcome precise enough to check. Everything else (opinions, insights, what ifs, disclosures) can never be settled by the record, so it carries no assessment.
The record, in short
What the tape says about how Tim argues and how the claims held up. Everything they said, and everything said about them, is in the tabs below.
How they sound: speaking style how? →
268 words/min while actually speaking · 61.9 um and uh per 1k words
No argument clarity score for Tim Hwang: no usable question→answer exchanges on raw tape (a fair score needs 8+). We do not score a sample that small. Roundtable and news formats yield far fewer direct exchanges than interviews.
Measured by listening to the audio itself: 2,700 words across 1 episode of raw-level tape, transcribed verbatim with every um and uh kept, each one attributed only where the alignment onto our timed stream is unambiguous. These are measurements of speaking style. We do not rank them: across this corpus, fluency and argument quality are nearly uncorrelated (ρ≈0.2), and smooth talking does not signal clear thinking. How it's measured →
Everything Tim Hwang said on the MAD Podcast that made the record, most notable first. Filter by type, assessment or year in the ledger →
Appearances (1)
| Episode | Date | Speaking time |
|---|---|---|
| Tim Hwang, FiscalNote // Data Driven NYC 21 // Dec 2013 (Hosted by FirstMark Capital) | Jan 16, 2014 | 12m |