The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

clear all ✕

why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Mitra: OnDeck increased applicant scoring coverage from 60% to over 95%
“When we started, we could only score about 60% of our applicants. Now we can score more than 95%.”
Abhra Mitra May 28, 2014 ▶ 11:03 Noah Breslow & Abhra Mitra, onDeck // Data Driven #27 // May 2014 (Hosted by FirstMark Capital)
Disclosure
Mitra: OnDeck uses two to three human reviewers per loan application
“The second is loan applications. So there it, you know, it's typically two to three people so in the, in, in the case of, for example, industry prediction we would predict an industry, but we're not gonna automatically classify a loan applicant right off the b…”
Abhra Mitra May 28, 2014 ▶ 20:48 Noah Breslow & Abhra Mitra, onDeck // Data Driven #27 // May 2014 (Hosted by FirstMark Capital)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 400 conversations transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.