Disclosure certainty 4/5 debate potential 1/5

Mitra: OnDeck uses two to three human reviewers per loan application

Abhra Mitra · Noah Breslow & Abhra Mitra, onDeck // Data Driven #27 // May 2014 (Hosted by FirstMark Capital) · May 28, 2014 · at 20:48

Abhra Mitra is OnDeck's Lead Data Scientist. He is answering an audience question about the level of manual processing and human intervention involved in OnDeck's lending pipeline.

0:00 / 0:19exact quote · 19.2s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“The second is loan applications. So there it, you know, it's typically two to three people so in the, in, in the case of, for example, industry prediction we would predict an industry, but we're not gonna automatically classify a loan applicant right off the bat. So we actually show it to a human, and then in some cases we're wrong, they override that.”

quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →

More from Abhra Mitra

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Mitra: OnDeck increased applicant scoring coverage from 60% to over 95%
“When we started, we could only score about 60% of our applicants. Now we can score more than 95%.”
Abhra Mitra May 28, 2014 ▶ 11:03 Noah Breslow & Abhra Mitra, onDeck // Data Driven #27 // May 2014 (Hosted by FirstMark Capital)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 400 conversations transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.