The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Matt Ocko no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
1redirected or not addressed
Redirected raw tape D 2 · C 4 · P 4 · Cm 4 3.40

Q Do you, do you find, um, and you guys, uh, Roger and Matt should feel free to, to answer, but, um, do you guys feel that there is, uh, there are certain industries which are more advanced in terms of their interest in big data solutions over others?

A I, I'm, I'm gonna chime in and say, um, you know, I, I, I think, I think being, Nailed it. If you run a Fortune 2000 business anywhere in the G seven, G eight, ah, or even in a An emerging second, you know, first and a half world economy like, ah, Brazil or, ah, or coastal China. Um, you have to have near real time KPI, ah, to, to stay alive. Ah, and I, I think people, People have this odd view of the enterprise, um, as Brontosaurus-like, um, you know, maybe because we've all read too many Dilbert cartoons, um, but, but that's not the case. Um, these are by and large, um, very well run companies that often do more difficult stuff, uh, in, in aggregate than a lot of our startups in, in deference to, uh, to the global 2000. And, uh, They are sophisticated consumers of data. What they are not is Speedy to the point of foolhardiness. So we all fetishize, or we'd like to fetishize, the Stalinist posters at Facebook, you know, ship fast and break things, or break things and then ship fixes later, or, ah, what the hell, just break stuff. Um, and you can't do that if, you know, the wrong pipe spits out the wrong stuff and everybody in 18 surrounding villages dies. Or if the wrong pipe spits out the wrong stuff and your product, you know, kills two million children under six because your medicine was toxic. So, the enterprise has this weight of regulation and obligation surrounding it. …

AI assessment note: “If you run a Fortune 2000 business anywhere in the G seven... sophisticated consumers of data”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 400 conversations transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.