The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Jon Hyman no published score: only 1 usable exchange on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
1on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 4 · C 5 · P 5 · Cm 4 4.55

Q Thank you very much. So using Kafka and Elastic, that's awesome if you have a really strong tech team. Did you guys think about this, I guess, in terms of alternatives to, you know, for something that would be simpler, and why did you choose those?

A Well, so one thing I'll say is that what's been challenging for us from kind of the get-go Uh, when we add new technologies is having to do it at a large scale. So if we're gonna, when we first put our Kafka cluster in, I mentioned we started this in 2016 with Currents, um, that was actually the first, uh, use of Kafka for us. Um, we'd already been around for five years doing a lot of other stuff. So we said, okay, as soon as we turn this on, we're gonna be sending, like, hundreds of billions of events through it. It needs to kind of scale. Um, so the, we went into it pretty cautiously because we said, like, we can't go Halfway. We're going to have to turn it on full throttle. Um, but we are looking at things of how can we get quick wins, um, through managed services. So that's actually why we started the Elastic Hash service. This diagnostic project, uh, actually started off, um, as a series of hack days to see how far we could kind of get this going, um, with like minimal kind of work. And we were able to put it into Amazon, um, and then we ran out of disk space, um, and then we overwhelmed it. Uh, and then we ran out of Elasticsearch nodes and had to increase our, our limit of more instances, and it was just like a whole thing. But we are evaluating ways in which we can use other services to just get us off the ground faster, um, and then manage it only kind of when we need …

AI assessment note: “we are looking at things of how can we get quick wins, um, through managed services.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 400 conversations transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.