Engineers cannot achieve true senior-level mastery in four years at one company
Will Larson · A masterclass in engineering leadership from Carta, Stripe, and Uber | Will Larson (CTO at Carta) · Nov 16, 2023 · at 1:10:52
Carta CTO Will Larson discusses engineering career progression and the apprenticeship model required to master engineering fundamentals.
0:00 / 0:10exact quote · 10.0s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“They can't develop everything you need to be an effective senior engineer in four years working in one company. You need to like see different views on these different problems to really kind of develop mastery.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Will Larson
Tech companies dodged engineering resource allocation for a decade through overhiring
“One challenge of the last decade, right, is that resource allocation was largely dodged by many companies because they just Decided to spend more and hire more folks. And so oftentimes the real constraint was, like, hiring velocity on a given team and your abi…”
Believing engineering managers shouldn't get into technical details is an anti-pattern
“I think one of the lessons in management over the last decade has been that You know, managers are people leaders in that it is micromanagement that it is bad to get into the details. I think this is like an anti pattern because it creates disengaged and like …”
Larson: Engineering executives must educate peers instead of shielding teams
“The most valuable thing as an executive you can do is educate like the other execs on how engineering works, not kind of protecting engineering from visibility from anyone else.”
CTOs and chief architects lack context for centralized technical decisions
“Chief architects and CTOs are pretty inefficient in terms of Actually getting enough context in their heads to make a good decision on any given, given point.”
Larson: Architecture review committees rarely make the best technical decisions
“And then committees, like in almost every architecture group turns into a committee where they have to balance their different perspectives, or they're just like slow and kind of inelegant. It's rarely true that a committee gets the best decision.”