The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

clear all ✕

why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

What-if
Beauchamp: 8 Rivers needs $100M to reach FID on two major projects
“With that hundred million, we would achieve FID on both Cormorant and one of our AFCC projects that we've announced with ENTEC or Pacific Corp. So with that, we would achieve FID and break ground on both of those projects.”
Damien Beauchamp Sep 10, 2025 ▶ 31:10 The sunk cost dilemma
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Beauchamp: 8 Rivers panicked when SK offtake contract timelines shifted
“There wasn't a firm off-take contract in place, but that moment was one of kind of panic and a feeling of desperation and devastation because of the amount of time, energy, and money that had been put into that particular project because we were trying to do i…”
Damien Beauchamp Sep 10, 2025 ▶ 15:41 The sunk cost dilemma
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Beauchamp: 8 Rivers has secured 18% offtake for Project Cormorant
“You know, the project is structured to produce 900,000 tons of ammonia, and we've, we found offtake for about 18% of that 900,000, and we're working on, on getting the rest of that ammonia offtake secured.”
Damien Beauchamp Sep 10, 2025 ▶ 12:31 The sunk cost dilemma
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.