Apr 20, 2022 · 22m · green-blueprint

How bitcoin is keeping zombie power plants alive

Brian Kahn · 10m spoken Stephen Lacey · 8m spoken Plant Tour Guide · 10s spoken News Anchor · 8s spoken Local Resident · 7s spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Host Stephen Lacey and climate journalist Brian Kahn investigate how energy-intensive Bitcoin mining is resurrecting defunct fossil fuel plants across the United States. They explore the local ecological fallout, the mechanics of Proof of Work, and the regulatory challenges threatening climate goals.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →

The hosts as informed peer 2.4 Guest teaching 4.6 Guest disagreement 0.0 The hosts pushing back 0.1
05100:0010:0020:000:57–3:53 · The hosts as informed peer 0/10 Reassessing the Environmental Toll of Bitcoin Segment 1 is an introductory solo monologue by host Stephen Lacey framing the episode's themes and citing historical data center efficiency statistics. Per instructions for monologue segments, host and guest interaction scores are set to 0.3:57–7:05 · The hosts as informed peer 3/10 Reviving Seneca Lake Shuttered Power Plant Lacey guides the narrative by asking Kahn about his reporting on the Greenidge power plant. Kahn explains the backstory of the retired coal plant converting to gas and crypto mining.7:15–9:31 · The hosts as informed peer 2/10 The Energy Intensive Mechanics of Bitcoin Mining Lacey prompts Kahn to break down why Bitcoin mining consumes so much computing power. Kahn explains the competitive race among mining rigs solving mathematical algorithms.9:33–11:46 · The hosts as informed peer 3/10 Upstate New York as an Industrial Crypto Hub Lacey asks what differentiates crypto energy demand from standard internet and cloud data centers. Kahn explains the distinction between centralized corporate sustainability goals and decentralized profit-maximizing crypto miners.11:46–15:21 · The hosts as informed peer 2/10 Zombie Plants Local Impacts and Community Opposition Kahn educates Lacey on behind-the-meter economics, revealing that Greenidge makes roughly eight times more revenue from mining than from grid power. He also details local community pushback in the Finger Lakes.15:32–17:49 · The hosts as informed peer 3/10 Explaining Proof of Work Versus Proof of Stake Lacey challenges Kahn to provide a plain-language explanation of proof of work versus proof of stake. Kahn delivers a capture-the-flag analogy that Lacey applauds.17:49–21:32 · The hosts as informed peer 4/10 Policy Hurdles and the Threat to Climate Goals Lacey demonstrates domain knowledge regarding coal retirements and state climate targets, probing Kahn on whether zombie plants create a template to evade decarbonization goals.0:57–3:53 · Guest teaching 0/10 Reassessing the Environmental Toll of Bitcoin Segment 1 is an introductory solo monologue by host Stephen Lacey framing the episode's themes and citing historical data center efficiency statistics. Per instructions for monologue segments, host and guest interaction scores are set to 0.3:57–7:05 · Guest teaching 5/10 Reviving Seneca Lake Shuttered Power Plant Lacey guides the narrative by asking Kahn about his reporting on the Greenidge power plant. Kahn explains the backstory of the retired coal plant converting to gas and crypto mining.7:15–9:31 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Energy Intensive Mechanics of Bitcoin Mining Lacey prompts Kahn to break down why Bitcoin mining consumes so much computing power. Kahn explains the competitive race among mining rigs solving mathematical algorithms.9:33–11:46 · Guest teaching 5/10 Upstate New York as an Industrial Crypto Hub Lacey asks what differentiates crypto energy demand from standard internet and cloud data centers. Kahn explains the distinction between centralized corporate sustainability goals and decentralized profit-maximizing crypto miners.11:46–15:21 · Guest teaching 6/10 Zombie Plants Local Impacts and Community Opposition Kahn educates Lacey on behind-the-meter economics, revealing that Greenidge makes roughly eight times more revenue from mining than from grid power. He also details local community pushback in the Finger Lakes.15:32–17:49 · Guest teaching 6/10 Explaining Proof of Work Versus Proof of Stake Lacey challenges Kahn to provide a plain-language explanation of proof of work versus proof of stake. Kahn delivers a capture-the-flag analogy that Lacey applauds.17:49–21:32 · Guest teaching 5/10 Policy Hurdles and the Threat to Climate Goals Lacey demonstrates domain knowledge regarding coal retirements and state climate targets, probing Kahn on whether zombie plants create a template to evade decarbonization goals.0:57–3:53 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Reassessing the Environmental Toll of Bitcoin Segment 1 is an introductory solo monologue by host Stephen Lacey framing the episode's themes and citing historical data center efficiency statistics. Per instructions for monologue segments, host and guest interaction scores are set to 0.3:57–7:05 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Reviving Seneca Lake Shuttered Power Plant Lacey guides the narrative by asking Kahn about his reporting on the Greenidge power plant. Kahn explains the backstory of the retired coal plant converting to gas and crypto mining.7:15–9:31 · Guest disagreement 0/10 The Energy Intensive Mechanics of Bitcoin Mining Lacey prompts Kahn to break down why Bitcoin mining consumes so much computing power. Kahn explains the competitive race among mining rigs solving mathematical algorithms.9:33–11:46 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Upstate New York as an Industrial Crypto Hub Lacey asks what differentiates crypto energy demand from standard internet and cloud data centers. Kahn explains the distinction between centralized corporate sustainability goals and decentralized profit-maximizing crypto miners.11:46–15:21 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Zombie Plants Local Impacts and Community Opposition Kahn educates Lacey on behind-the-meter economics, revealing that Greenidge makes roughly eight times more revenue from mining than from grid power. He also details local community pushback in the Finger Lakes.15:32–17:49 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Explaining Proof of Work Versus Proof of Stake Lacey challenges Kahn to provide a plain-language explanation of proof of work versus proof of stake. Kahn delivers a capture-the-flag analogy that Lacey applauds.17:49–21:32 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Policy Hurdles and the Threat to Climate Goals Lacey demonstrates domain knowledge regarding coal retirements and state climate targets, probing Kahn on whether zombie plants create a template to evade decarbonization goals.0:57–3:53 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Reassessing the Environmental Toll of Bitcoin Segment 1 is an introductory solo monologue by host Stephen Lacey framing the episode's themes and citing historical data center efficiency statistics. Per instructions for monologue segments, host and guest interaction scores are set to 0.3:57–7:05 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Reviving Seneca Lake Shuttered Power Plant Lacey guides the narrative by asking Kahn about his reporting on the Greenidge power plant. Kahn explains the backstory of the retired coal plant converting to gas and crypto mining.7:15–9:31 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 The Energy Intensive Mechanics of Bitcoin Mining Lacey prompts Kahn to break down why Bitcoin mining consumes so much computing power. Kahn explains the competitive race among mining rigs solving mathematical algorithms.9:33–11:46 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Upstate New York as an Industrial Crypto Hub Lacey asks what differentiates crypto energy demand from standard internet and cloud data centers. Kahn explains the distinction between centralized corporate sustainability goals and decentralized profit-maximizing crypto miners.11:46–15:21 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Zombie Plants Local Impacts and Community Opposition Kahn educates Lacey on behind-the-meter economics, revealing that Greenidge makes roughly eight times more revenue from mining than from grid power. He also details local community pushback in the Finger Lakes.15:32–17:49 · The hosts pushing back 0/10 Explaining Proof of Work Versus Proof of Stake Lacey challenges Kahn to provide a plain-language explanation of proof of work versus proof of stake. Kahn delivers a capture-the-flag analogy that Lacey applauds.17:49–21:32 · The hosts pushing back 1/10 Policy Hurdles and the Threat to Climate Goals Lacey demonstrates domain knowledge regarding coal retirements and state climate targets, probing Kahn on whether zombie plants create a template to evade decarbonization goals.

speaking balance: gold is the hosts, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%0:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the hosts 0% · guest 100%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 21:28 Playful banter on divesting CryptoKitties

The interview is uniformly collegial, with this lighthearted exchange being the closest instance of comedic disagreement when Kahn tells Lacey he must let go of his CryptoKitties.

Hardest push from the hosts ▶ 17:49 Host questions why miners refuse proof of stake

Lacey presses Kahn directly on why miners would not immediately adopt proof of stake if it offers a 99 percent energy reduction.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 16:26 Capture the flag analogy for consensus mechanisms

Kahn clearly explains the technical difference between proof of work and proof of stake using an intuitive capture-the-flag metaphor.

The host holds their own ▶ 19:56 Host articulates grid dynamics and coal plant economics

Lacey demonstrates deep understanding of power sector economics by summarizing how crypto mining threatens to reverse a decade of coal retirements.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe hosts as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe hosts pushing backWhy
Reassessing the Environmental Toll of Bitcoin 0000 Segment 1 is an introductory solo monologue by host Stephen Lacey framing the episode's themes and citing historical data center efficiency statistics. Per instructions for monologue segments, host and guest interaction scores are set to 0.
Reviving Seneca Lake Shuttered Power Plant 3500 Lacey guides the narrative by asking Kahn about his reporting on the Greenidge power plant. Kahn explains the backstory of the retired coal plant converting to gas and crypto mining.
The Energy Intensive Mechanics of Bitcoin Mining 2500 Lacey prompts Kahn to break down why Bitcoin mining consumes so much computing power. Kahn explains the competitive race among mining rigs solving mathematical algorithms.
Upstate New York as an Industrial Crypto Hub 3500 Lacey asks what differentiates crypto energy demand from standard internet and cloud data centers. Kahn explains the distinction between centralized corporate sustainability goals and decentralized profit-maximizing crypto miners.
Zombie Plants Local Impacts and Community Opposition 2600 Kahn educates Lacey on behind-the-meter economics, revealing that Greenidge makes roughly eight times more revenue from mining than from grid power. He also details local community pushback in the Finger Lakes.
Explaining Proof of Work Versus Proof of Stake 3600 Lacey challenges Kahn to provide a plain-language explanation of proof of work versus proof of stake. Kahn delivers a capture-the-flag analogy that Lacey applauds.
Policy Hurdles and the Threat to Climate Goals 4501 Lacey demonstrates domain knowledge regarding coal retirements and state climate targets, probing Kahn on whether zombie plants create a template to evade decarbonization goals.

Statements from this episode (9)

Assertion Supported
Lacey: Bitcoin mining consumes 0.5% of world's electricity with double-digit annual growth
“Bitcoin mining today uses a half percent of the world's electricity, and every year, as more shipping containers and warehouses full of high-powered computers are deployed to unlock more Bitcoin, energy use grows by double digits.”
Stephen Lacey Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 1:18
Assertion Supported
Lacey: Data centers use 1% of global electricity despite 15x traffic growth
“They use one percent of electricity globally, and that number has basically stayed the same, even as internet traffic grew fifteenfold since 2010.”
Stephen Lacey Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 2:11
Assertion Supported
Lacey: Mining one Bitcoin uses 8 to 13 years of household power
“One mined Bitcoin could use anywhere from eight to 13 years worth of household electricity.”
Stephen Lacey Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 3:16
Assertion Supported
Lacey: A single Bitcoin transaction can power a US home for six weeks
“And if you want to trade that Bitcoin or use it to buy something, no matter how small, that single transaction could use enough energy to power an American home for six weeks.”
Stephen Lacey Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 3:22
Assertion Supported
Lacey: Struggling US Fossil Fuel Plants Get Lifeline From Bitcoin Miners
“What Brian saw in Lake Seneca is unfolding across the U.S. Coal and gas power plants that are under pressure in Ohio, Montana, Pennsylvania, and even elsewhere in New York are now getting an economic lifeline thanks to partnerships with Bitcoin miners.”
Stephen Lacey Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 6:11
Insight
Kahn: Decentralized mining incentivizes cheap fossil fuels over Big Tech net-zero goals
“When it comes to these big tech companies, like Google, for example, like they want to get to net zero. They want to get to a hundred percent renewables. That is like a centralized decision that Google is making for crypto and for cryptocurrency mining in part…”
Brian Kahn Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 9:51
Assertion Partly supported
Kahn: Greenidge earns 8x more mining Bitcoin than supplying grid power
“And the majority of the money they're making is not when they're putting power onto the grid, when they're, where they're making the most money is what's going on behind the grid. And you know, their revenue disclosures It was, you know, essentially almost a, …”
Brian Kahn Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 12:59
Assertion Supported
Kahn: Proof of stake consensus reduces crypto energy consumption by 99%
“I mean, it's literally a 99% reduction. That's the, or those are the best estimates.”
Brian Kahn Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 17:45
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Kahn: Greenidge provides a blueprint for private equity to resurrect fossil plants
“It's absolutely possible that those plants could come back just like Greenwich did. And that, I think, is the biggest concern here is that if you are a Bitcoin mining company, if you are a private equity firm, if you're a venture capitalist, You can be looking…”
Brian Kahn Apr 20, 2022 ▶ 20:25
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.