The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Harley Finkelstein no published score: no usable exchanges on raw tape, and a fair score needs 8+ record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
1exchanges match
0on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered produced feed D 5 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.60

Q But one thing I'm just really interested in is the law school experience. Like, as you look back Do you think that it was worth your time going to law school? Do you feel like you leverage any of the ways of thinking you were taught in law school in the work you do today? Do you think it was a waste of time? What are your thoughts on that?

A I'll start with the law school part, and then I'll talk a bit about why I think right now we're sort of in this golden age of entrepreneurship. Law school taught me, at least, how to find solutions to problems. It didn't, didn't give me solutions, but it taught me how to go deep on something. One of the things that you have to do, um, at least in your first year of law school, what they call L-one, is you're given like 3000 pages to read, and you have to pull out the one legal maxim, or the, what they call the ratio desidenti, which is a legal term, excuse me, a Latin term, which is like, what is the thing? What is the lesson that this particular piece of case law teaches you? And that ability to sift through tons and tons of content, but pull out the most important piece that can be applied to other Anecdotes, or stories, or situations. That was really important. I wasn't a great writer. I went to a really great high school, public high school in the United States, called Spanish River. At the time, it was one of the best high schools in America. I didn't learn how to write very well at that school. When I went to college, went to McGill, I didn't learn how to write very well either. I mean, I was okay as a writer, but I was not nearly as well written as I needed to be. Law school taught me how to write. Law school taught me how to write concisely, how to say the thing, and sa…

AI assessment note: “Law school taught me, at least, how to find solutions to problems.”

page 1
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.