why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Craib: Numerai has paid contributors over $30 million, surpassing Kaggle payouts
“Numeri has created the highest paying data science tournament on the internet.
We pay out more than Kaggle does, and we've paid out over thirty million dollars since we started.”
Assertion Supported
Craib: Numerai pioneered cryptocurrency staking back in 2017
“And that mechanism is something we pioneered back in 2017, long before most people had heard about staking.”
Assertion Supported
Craib: Numerai's native cryptocurrency is more liquid than some stocks
“In fact, our cryptocurrency is more liquid than some stocks, and so people will earn some of it, maybe they'll earn 10,000 dollars by staking on Numurai, and then they'll go to Coinbase and sell it into dollars, or they'll keep staking it on their model.”
Assertion Partly supported
Craib: Numerai user base doubled in 2018 despite token crashing 90%
“Well, there was a time in 2018 when NMR, our cryptocurrency, was down maybe, yeah, more than 80%, maybe 90%. And in that year, our user base doubled.”
Assertion Partly supported
Craib: Numerai scaled to 2,000 data features and 5,500 active modelers
“There are now almost 2000. Three years ago, it was 40. We only had 40 features, and now it's 2000, and over that same period, the number of data scientists submitting models has grown from a hundred to five and a half thousand.”