why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Kuruvilla: Philip Morris rates higher in ESG databases than lung cancer drugmakers
“So we have often marveled that Philip Morris, which is a widely known provisioner of cigarettes and tobacco, rates more highly on many of these databases than on companies that are actually trying to treat lung cancer.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Russo: Philip Morris CEO expects $1 billion in savings from big data
“Even Philip Morris, when I met with the CEO in Switzerland in September, suggested that they'd have a billion dollar savings potential over the next several years. And when I asked him what it sourced from, he said, big data.”
Opinion
Russo: Juul's rise has increased business risk for Philip Morris
“I now know that with Juul's ascendancy, there is more risk to the business than there was when it was at a 120, and the product that they tried to launch was delayed, has consequences.”
Assertion Partly supported
Philip Morris's IQOS captured 25% of Japan's market in 18 months
“And as a result of those spending years, they developed a product that once launched, 18 months ago, has captured nearly 25% of markets in Japan, the first market it launched to. They've converted two million cigarette smokers to users of one of their new prod…”
Assertion Partly supported
Philip Morris invested $500 million annually into reduced-risk product research
“Philip Morris, four years ago, decided that they were going to take about half a billion dollars a year from their income statement. And deploy it into efforts to research and develop a reduced risk product set so that they could come to their consumers.”