The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Touting $25K angel checks in consensus hot companies shows zero value proposition
“The thing that kills me dead, and this is a work one, is when I meet with folks, and they tell me about what a good investor they're in, because they're in companies A, B, and C, and the number of times that I hear, literally in the course of a week, the same …”
Partner time and engagement are the true scarce resources in seed investing
“One thing that we heard constantly from entrepreneurs in those days is it turns out that the Capital's not the scarce resource. It's the time and the engagement. And so surmounting that engagement hurdle, I think, is one thing that's really challenging, and I …”
Allocators must test managers' competitive advantages and their own evaluation abilities
“You're always testing a joint hypothesis. Is this manager an outstanding manager with a sustainable competitive advantage is hypothesis one. The second is, am I sufficiently aware and educated that I can ascertain that?”