Jun 26, 2017 · 1h 17m · capital-allocators
Andrew Golden – Beyond the Long Term (Capital Allocators, EP.13)
0:00 / 0:00
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Andy Golden, longtime president of the Princeton University Investment Company (PRINCO), discussing his career evolution, governance design, manager selection philosophy, and long-term portfolio construction.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 19% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Ted as informed peer 5.4 Guest teaching 3.6 Guest disagreement 1.4 Ted pushing back 1.5
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 49:00 Reframing contractual alignment of interests
Andy firmly rejects conventional LP rhetoric about contractual alignment of interest, arguing instead that investors must evaluate managers' intrinsic appetite for performance versus wealth accumulation.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 45:30 Pushing on hedge fund asset bloatTed directly challenges Andy on whether massive asset expansion undermines hedge fund returns and asks at what point a manager simply becomes too large to generate alpha.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 25:00 Theory over data paradoxAndy educates the listener and host on why rigid empirical data can be misleading in long-term investing, explaining that if empirical data contradicts a sound foundational theory, the data is often the flawed element.
Ted holds their own ▶ 37:40 Probing heuristic frameworks vs portfolio theoryTed demonstrates his institutional expertise by dissecting whether top-down policy portfolios remain relevant in an increasingly bottom-up manager selection environment.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career Trajectory: From Photography to Endowment Management | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Ted establishes rapport by prompting Andy about his unusual background transitioning from commercial photography and philosophy to the Yale Investments Office under David Swensen and Dean Takahashi. Andy explains his career progression candidly with humor. | |
| Early PRINCO History and Developing a Discretionary Governance Model | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Ted demonstrates solid institutional knowledge regarding endowment governance models, highlighting how rare full staff discretion was in the 1990s. Andy details PRINCO's evolution from trustee-driven security selection to an empowered staff model. | |
| External Manager Philosophy and Core Institutional Advantages | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Ted probes why PRINCO relies exclusively on external managers rather than building internal teams. Andy outlines the structural compensation discounts, agency problems, and cultural advantages of mission-driven external manager selection. | |
| Beyond the Long Term and Balancing Theory with Data | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | Ted invites Andy to unpack what he means by potential long horizon. Andy offers an intellectual reframe on Beyond the Long Term (BLT) and prioritising theoretical frameworks over noisy empirical data. | |
| Sponsor: Ridgeline Investment Management Technology | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | The segment includes a mid-roll sponsor break for Ridgeline followed by Ted asking how PRINCO differentiates between theory and data during manager drawdowns. Andy explains qualitative re-underwriting. | |
| Real Return Objectives and Policy Portfolio Construction | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted questions PRINCO's ambitious 10% nominal return target against university spending rates. Andy explains the policy portfolio construction and how PRINCO managed an inadvertent overweight to private equity after the 2008 financial crisis. | |
| "One Team, One Dream" Framework and Concentrated Equities | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Ted presses Andy on equity implementation, asking whether PRINCO hedges or ports exposures when allocations deviate. Andy details their concentrated biotech exposure and explains why a top-down heuristic framework remains necessary for board governance. | |
| Absolute Return Strategy and Scaling Manager Capacity | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Ted notes the high concentration in PRINCO's independent return portfolio (25% across only 15 relationships) and challenges Andy on whether asset growth degrades hedge fund returns. Andy explains how scale can occasionally serve as an advantage. | |
| Private Equity Fee Structures and Alignment of Appetites | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Ted highlights the rising fee scrutiny in alternative assets, contrasting hedge funds with private equity. Andy reframes alignment of interest into alignment of appetites, distinguishing between founders driven by investment excellence versus asset accumulation. | |
| Team Structure, "Grow-Your-Own" Talent, and Bull-Bear Sessions | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Ted explores how PRINCO recruits and structures talent. Andy outlines PRINCO's grow-your-own junior talent strategy and their all-hands bull-bear investment committee debate process. | |
| Debias Decision-Making: Devil's Advocates and Post-GFC Lessons | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Ted asks when the devil's advocate process originated. Andy candidly explains how post-GFC reflection revealed that subtle internal political dynamics had degraded prior decision-making. | |
| Data Utilization, Bayesian Judgment, and Investment as Art and Science | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Ted inquires about the impact of big data and quant methods on endowment management. Andy argues that data cannot substitute for Bayesian qualitative assessment and warns against torturing quantitative data to justify gut feelings. | |
| Market Environment, Valuation Disconnects, and Portfolio Hedging | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Ted and Andy discuss market valuations, suppressed volatility, and low rates. Andy explains PRINCO's rare top-down currency hedge on RMB exposures to mitigate outsized China risks. | |
| Concluding Questions: Life Philosophy, Influences, and Reflections | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Ted transitions to standard closing questions covering life lessons, favorite books (The Selfish Gene), guilty pleasures, and advice to one's younger self. Andy responds with characteristic wit and self-deprecation. |
Statements from this episode (29)
Golden: Swensen helped secure a Princeton offer triple my Yale pay
“Dave Swenson, I asked for his help, and he got me an offer to come to Princeton for triple my compensation. I got my own offer to go to Duke, my alma mater, undergrad, for double, so I took the Duke job”
Golden: A single volunteer directed Princeton's portfolio for decades
“And for decades, there had basically been a single volunteer who made security level decisions.”
Golden: I originally proposed a Yale-style committee governance model
“It was really unusual, and in fact, was not what I originally proposed. I said to Ed, I don't want to reinvent things when there's a good model. You know, here's a kind of Yale-like model where the major decisions, manager hires, fund re-ups, would still flow …”
Golden: Knowledgeable investment boards enable allocators to take contrarian pain
“It means that you got to be contrarian, and it means that you got to be able to do some uncomfortable things. And people who understand what you're doing will allow you greater units of discomfort, and they will also allow you to optimize that discomfort spend…”
Golden: True time horizon is enduring discomfort without changing course
“But the real horizon is not what you claim your horizon is. The real horizon is this thing that you maybe don't even discover until after the fact. It's how long Can you go with a large amount of discomfort without changing your path inappropriately?”
Golden: In investing, theory can outweigh conflicting empirical data
“Being able to have an appreciation of theory over data in the right bounds is key. You know, there are times when you want to say, if the data don't support the theory, the data are wrong, right?”
Golden: Consistent high returns make investor commentary sound smarter
“You know, so another advantage is if you put up good numbers for long enough, all of a sudden everything you say sounds a whole lot smarter than it used to.”
Golden: Performance attribution studies are rarely worth the paper they're written on
“You know, attribution studies tend not to be worth the paper they're written on, and I believe or not can go on long about that.”
Golden: Managers develop bad agency habits when things go well, not badly
“People tend to develop bad habits when things are going well, in terms of separating interests with clients, not when things are going badly”
Golden: PRINCO avoids black-box and discretionary market-feel trading strategies
“It's one of the reasons why there's a bunch of strategies that we don't invest in, even though others have made a ton of money. But we know that when the bad times come, we would not be able to do anything to give us confidence to continue... You know, any bla…”
Golden: PRINCO targets 25% private equity, 25% hedge funds, 19% real assets
“If we just kind of go around the pie chart, it's 10% dedicated to domestic equity, long-only managers, six percent to other developed markets, long-ish only managers, 10% to emerging market public equity managers, 25% in the category we call independent return…”
Golden: Since 2009, there has been an active cost to portfolio diversification
“It's still, you know, since 2009, the frustration has still been that not just zero return to diversification, there's been a cost to diversification, but there's also been a cost to hard work.”
Golden: PRINCO allocates 4% of the endowment to a single equity manager
“Within domestic equity, we've got 40% of that 10%. Your listeners can do the math. It's about four points with just one manager, right?”
Golden: PRINCO's top equity manager focuses on fallen angel biotech stocks
“These guys you know, who many of our closest friends invest with them do biotech stocks, fallen angel biotech stocks. So you're not just concentrating, you're concentrating on, you know, a sector that can be quite volatile, that is pretty distinctive.”
Golden: Most institutions suffer from over-diversification rather than concentration
“I think most institutions are much more prone to over-diversification or its cousin de-worsification, as Pierre Lynch would say than they are the opposite issue.”
Golden: PRINCO wouldn't invest in hedge funds for median returns
“If we were condemned to produce the median return of the hedge fund space, there's I don't think we'd have any allocation.”
Golden: PRINCO concentrates independent returns across roughly 15 manager relationships
“Our opinion of the asset class is quite different, if you want to call it an asset class, opinion of, you know, the, that collection of managers is quite different from the opinion of our 15 or so relationships that we have there.”
Golden: LPs should optimize private equity fees, not just minimize them
“On the specific point about fees, we believe it's important to optimize fees, not minimize fees. And we want to make sure that the firms actually have, you know, revenues to the principles that are enough to make them silly rich without having to find some oth…”
Golden: Base management fees should not create major wealth for fund managers
“Base level fees really should not be the source of major wealth.”
Golden: PRINCO relies almost entirely on hiring undergraduates directly from college
“But where we think the future of PRINCO is, is mostly, if not entirely, on our grow our own. And so we're hiring one to three or maybe more kids out of college, primarily Princeton, where we have some unfair recruiting advantages.”
Golden: Lateral investment hires often fail to adapt beyond fixed recipes
“And what we're really looking for are first principle thinkers as opposed to learn a recipe and just use that recipe, which is one of the reasons why it's often difficult to bring the lateral higher in because they've got a certain way of doing it, and it's ha…”
Golden: PRINCO mandates blind pre- and post-meeting voting on all investments
“By the way, everyone walks in the room, the first thing they do is they get a ballot, and they have to say what their vote is going into the meeting, and then at the end of the meeting, they write down what their vote is, and then that piece of paper is set as…”
Golden: Rotating devil's advocate processes sound better than they actually work
“Process of that rotating assigned devil's advocate sounds a whole lot better than it actually is. We still haven't cracked the code as to how they're really implemented”
Golden: Over half of PRINCO's worst investment decisions involved political friction
“I only got to about number seven or eight when I realized that more than half of them shared this characteristic of there was some kind of political element”
Golden: Quantitative manager selection fails because return engines do not stay stable
“You can't get enough data to base a decision without, you know, running afoul of a key premise, which is that the engine that produced that is stable, right? And that nothing's changed.”
Golden: Manager selection matters more than timing or specific strategy
“We believe that who matters a whole lot more than
When you invest, and may even matter more than what they actually do.”
Golden: PRINCO holds heavy China exposure but hedges RMB currency risk
“We've got, if you were to dig deep enough, you would say, oh, I bet you they've got a lot of investment in China.
Yeah, we do.
And so maybe we want to take that RMB exposure down a little bit, because that's something you could imagine having, you know, a real…”
Golden: Early career advice should be to follow your like, not passion
“There's a cliche about following your passion. I feel that it's true, except for I want to modify that and say, follow your like. The problem with telling someone follow your passion is it presupposes that they know what passion is, and, you know, it's almost …”