Jul 17, 2017 · 1h 7m · capital-allocators
Adam Blitz – Inside Hedge Fund Allocation (Capital Allocators, EP.17)
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
Ted Seides interviews Adam Blitz, CEO and CIO of Evanston Capital Management, exploring Evanston's bottom-up manager selection process, qualitative due diligence framework, low-leverage portfolio construction, and the evolving role of hedge funds in institutional portfolios.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 22.8% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Adam delivers his most decisive warning of the interview, calling the trend of selling equity volatility a dangerous trap packaged as alternative yield.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 14:56 Ted challenging bottom-up selection with Markowitz asset allocationTed directly pushes back against Adam's purely bottom-up manager framework by citing Markowitz academic findings that top-down allocation drives the bulk of variance.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 9:45 Adam on the real reason hedge funds shifted to risk mitigationAdam candidly dismantles industry PR, explaining that disappointing returns forced underperforming funds to reposition themselves as risk mitigators when cash would do the same.
Ted holds their own ▶ 16:48 Ted dissecting the mathematics of long-short equity alpha vs. betaTed displays his allocator background by precisely articulating the arithmetic of long-short spread, beta drag, and net market exposure.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Blitz's Background: From Math to AQR and Evanston | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Ted prompts Adam to trace his journey from his early affinity for sports math to Goldman Sachs, AQR with Cliff Asnes, and founding Evanston. The exchange is warm, biographical, and highly collaborative. | |
| The Evolution of Hedge Funds: 2002 to Present | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Ted probes whether hedge funds' recent performance struggles drove the shift from return enhancement to risk mitigation. Adam candidly agrees, noting the average hedge fund fails to justify fees and shifts its narrative toward downside protection. | |
| Identifying Managerial Edge Across Strategy Disciplines | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ted asks how Adam filters thousands of funds down to roughly thirty holdings. Adam educates on sector dispersion in long-short equity, scale differences in distressed debt, and the need for structural edge in macro. | |
| Bottom-Up Manager Selection vs. Top-Down Asset Allocation | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Ted invokes Markowitz mean-variance optimization and probes whether bottom-up manager selection conflicts with top-down risk limits. Adam explains Evanston's qualitative risk framework and defends their contrarian heavy allocation to long-short equity. | |
| Evanston's Strategic Allocations and Low Leverage Philosophy | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted asks Adam to contrast Evanston's strategy breakdown with consensus industry allocations. Adam explains why they avoid highly leveraged quantitative strategies due to liquidity risk and margin vulnerability. | |
| Data Analytics vs. Soft Qualitative Factors in Due Diligence | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Ted asks whether data science and AI are reshaping fundamental due diligence. Adam explains why qualitative soft factors like competitive hunger remain superior to quantitative screens in manager evaluation. | |
| Manager Sourcing Channels and First Meeting Evaluation Criteria | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted explores manager sourcing channels and initial interview dynamics. Adam breaks down prime broker flow, network referrals from eccentric peers, and probing trade implementation over standard stock pitches. | |
| Operational Diligence, Background Checks, and Red Flags | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Ted asks what happens offline during background checking and operational due diligence. Adam details looking for missing references, forensic track record verification, and trusting instincts around perceived sleaze factors. | |
| Sponsor: Ridgeline Investment Management Platform | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | Following the Ridgeline platform sponsor read, Ted asks how a nine-person investment committee makes high-conviction decisions without succumbing to consensus groupthink. Adam outlines their unanimous-entry rule and the discipline of revisiting contentious ideas. | |
| Ongoing Manager Monitoring, Asset Growth, and Cultural Health | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Ted asks how Evanston monitors portfolio managers on an ongoing basis. Adam highlights tracking asset growth style drift, post-success internal culture friction, and informal touchpoints over rigid metric checks. | |
| Investment Lessons, Bank Spinouts, and Sizing Discipline | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted asks where Evanston has made mistakes. Adam reflects on backing investment bank spinouts who lacked true business-building grit, distinguishing macro skill from luck, and the emotional challenge of selling struggling managers. | |
| Market Opportunities: Equity Dispersion and Mispriced Volatility | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | Ted asks where Adam sees market opportunities and how allocators can trade volatility. Adam details why passive ETF flows create stock-picking dispersion and warns against the crowded retail trend of shorting VIX volatility. | |
| Systemic Risks: Market Liquidity and Factor Crowding | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted asks about systemic risks on Adam's radar. Adam outlines acute liquidity mismatches in credit markets, high-yield ETF fragility, and crowded factor models reliant on cheap leverage. | |
| The Future Outlook and Next Performance Node for Hedge Funds | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Ted asks Adam to scenario-plan the next performance node for the hedge fund industry. Adam outlines a two-thirds probability of market stumble leading to hedge fund outperformance, followed by closing reflection questions. |